iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

seefour
Pro
Pro
Posts: 239
Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:10 pm
Location: Brenham Texas

iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by seefour »

I have heard that a iron head will produce more power than aluminum all things being equal except the head material.
Is this true? the iron traps the heat and aids better in ignition<???
has anyone tried a thermal coating in combustion chamber to trap the heat with aluminum?
Do it right the first time
TMSJoe
Expert
Expert
Posts: 572
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 8:53 am
Location:

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by TMSJoe »

I have read that many times but have never had the opportunity to prove it.
pitts64
Member
Member
Posts: 129
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 8:00 am
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa.

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by pitts64 »

I always thought aluminum was more for the weight savings then anything else...
Cobra720
Member
Member
Posts: 57
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 6:27 pm
Location:

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by Cobra720 »

Cheaper to make (cnc) easier to repair I would think.
twl
Expert
Expert
Posts: 666
Joined: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:13 am
Location:

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by twl »

Yes.
Yes.
Yes.
Aluminum conducts heat faster and better than iron, so some higher amount of combustion heat is lost into the aluminum casting, vs iron.

The difference may be small, but it is often referenced when setting ignition timing.
Many people, including myself, have used thermal barrier coatings in aluminum heads to good effect. I can't say I recorded any measurable power differences which could directly be isolated to that coating alone, but the aircooled head runs cooler with the coatings.
Schurkey
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1862
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:42 am
Location: The Seasonally Frozen Wastelands

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by Schurkey »

I sort-of remember a magazine test where they took iron and aluminum castings from a certain manufacturer, which were "supposedly" identical in port shape, combustion chamber shape, etc.

They ran them on a dyno. The aluminum heads made more power than the iron heads, which was not the expected outcome.

This was a long time ago; I don't remember which magazine or what heads were selected. I'm sure it was SBC based.
boiler man
New Member
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2015 1:40 pm
Location:

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by boiler man »

from a heat transfer standpoint common aluminum will pass 136 BTU per hour per square foot of surface, iron will pass 46.33 BTU per hour per square foot of surface. Iron will pass .12 BTU per pound, Aluminum .24 BTU per pound. The rate of transfer changes based on the alloys that are used. But aluminum basically passes 3x the heat to the cooling system that iron will. The reason why iron heads are not guaranteed to make more power with all things being equal is because all things are usually not equal.


Dave.
racear2865
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1597
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: tenn

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by racear2865 »

This came up several years back with Smokey Yunick at a PRI seminar (I think). He said "all things being equal that cast iron would make more power. He then came right back and reminded us of the weight savings and repair ability of aluminum. He then said that in order to get more heat retention in aluminum--he poured sodium silicate in the water ports of the aluminum head and then rotated it on a rotisserie for 24 hrs or sumtin to that effect. It also helped to seal any porosity problems. He especially did it after he welded the heads. I have never tried this, so me dont know
reed
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7639
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by PackardV8 »

That cast iron heads make more power is proved by the fact every race engine in the world today, F1, Top Fuel, Pro Stock, NASCAR uses iron heads. Oh, wait, no one races iron heads . . . . .
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
racear2865
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1597
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:58 pm
Location: tenn

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by racear2865 »

PackardV8 wrote:That cast iron heads make more power is proved by the fact every race engine in the world today, F1, Top Fuel, Pro Stock, NASCAR uses iron heads. Oh, wait, no one races iron heads . . . . .


I totally agree. Used to there was quite a large difference in cost of aluminum versus cast. Not any more. So why would you go to cast unless tied by rules
reed
wyrmrider
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:52 pm
Location:

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by wyrmrider »

go to cast iron
or
go to cast aluminum
?
vs billet ?
groberts101
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1980
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 3:08 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by groberts101 »

I use coatings on all my personal stuff and have often seen greater cooling temp reductions with AL vs Cast. Not much overall difference in final temps when the coatings are used on either or.. but slightly greater percentage of change when coatings are used on AL. That alone tells me there must potentially be greater heat transfer occurring between the two materials and coatings are effectively closing the gap differential between the two materials.

I've found coatings will allow more aggressive tunes while also simultaneously improving safety margin/hotspot reduction/burndown time.

Either way you go here... the splitting of fine hair will be required to weigh such small differences. And those hairs get even finer when we're talking moderately powered street stuff rather than full race duty.
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by MadBill »

racear2865 wrote:This came up several years back with Smokey Yunick at a PRI seminar (I think). He said "all things being equal that cast iron would make more power. He then came right back and reminded us of the weight savings and repair ability of aluminum. He then said that in order to get more heat retention in aluminum--he poured sodium silicate in the water ports of the aluminum head and then rotated it on a rotisserie for 24 hrs or sumtin to that effect. It also helped to seal any porosity problems. He especially did it after he welded the heads. I have never tried this, so me dont know
reed
I followed that procedure, which was in one of his books, circa 1978 with my ZL-1 aluminum BBC heads. AIR, it went like this:
1. Clean the water jackets out ultra-well.
2. Bolt sealer plates onto head surface and all water outlets save one, which is fitted with a quick-connect air fitting.
3. Heat the head to 250° F. for at least an hour.
4. Pour a quart of water glass (Sodium Silicate) into the open port, cap it off and apply 100 psi air pressure.
5. Slosh the head around for a few minutes to distribute the liquid, then let sit for 30 min. or so, turning occasionally.
6. Release air pressure, remove plates and allow solution to drain.

I don't know how effective it was, but my then ~ 650 HP 495" all-aluminum BBC never gave a hint of overheating in my stock system '70 -1/2 Z28.
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
User avatar
BOOT
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2906
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 6:23 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by BOOT »

I'm surprised no one has mentioned what I always hear bout alum heads and that's how they will tolerate more compression with the same octane(heat dissipation). I like iron because it's stronger.
Channel About My diy Projects & Reviews https://www.youtube.com/c/BOOTdiy

I know as much as I can learn and try to keep an open mind to anything!

If I didn't overthink stuff I wouldn't be on speedtalk!
140Air
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1542
Joined: Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:55 pm
Location:

Re: iron head vs aluminum head combustion heat

Post by 140Air »

MadBill wrote:
racear2865 wrote:This came up several years back with Smokey Yunick at a PRI seminar (I think). He said "all things being equal that cast iron would make more power. He then came right back and reminded us of the weight savings and repair ability of aluminum. He then said that in order to get more heat retention in aluminum--he poured sodium silicate in the water ports of the aluminum head and then rotated it on a rotisserie for 24 hrs or sumtin to that effect. It also helped to seal any porosity problems. He especially did it after he welded the heads. I have never tried this, so me dont know
reed
I followed that procedure, which was in one of his books, circa 1978 with my ZL-1 aluminum BBC heads. AIR, it went like this:
1. Clean the water jackets out ultra-well.
2. Bolt sealer plates onto head surface and all water outlets save one, which is fitted with a quick-connect air fitting.
3. Heat the head to 250° F. for at least an hour.
4. Pour a quart of water glass (Sodium Silicate) into the open port, cap it off and apply 100 psi air pressure.
5. Slosh the head around for a few minutes to distribute the liquid, then let sit for 30 min. or so, turning occasionally.
6. Release air pressure, remove plates and allow solution to drain.

I don't know how effective it was, but my then ~ 650 HP 495" all-aluminum BBC never gave a hint of overheating in my stock system '70 -1/2 Z28.
Bill, what did you think was the mechanism of the benefit? You had overheating before?
Post Reply