SpeedTalk Store - Opinion Columns

tbi chevy cams

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

tbi chevy cams

Postby bhodges83 » Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:50 pm

Would like to get some real answers on the question of what is the largest cam i can run in a stock 93 chevrolet pickup with a 5.7 TBI without causing bad driveabilty problems.I have heard that a 268 is the largest one.I also have a friend that put a 270 in a 92 chevy and it run fair with a vaccum canister.All of the cam companies i have called give the same answers "we recommend our tbi cams" which are not very much different than stock.
bhodges83
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 6:33 pm

Postby ou812 » Tue Sep 25, 2007 11:52 pm

TBI is very sensitive to camshafts...if you want more power, change the heads. Those truck heads are very restrictive.
I would say the biggest cam I've used is the xe262 computer cam from Comp. But I change the heads, so this helps power alot. I also use a 6" rod to lighten the piston, and KB pistons.
Then do some chamber porting and minor short turn work to the heads and I run 1.6 x 1.5 rockers. Seems to work really well with the bigger throttle body and a spacer.
You can really feel the power of all these mods, and the more you do the better they run. If you only do one or two things, it's not very noticeable.

Brian
ou812
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 864
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: SoCal

Postby needforspeed66gt » Wed Sep 26, 2007 1:38 am

We do a lot of performance 383 TBI motors, they pass smog and the drivability is great. We do a scat 3.75" stroke/Manley 6.0" rod/Wiseco forged piston/World Sportsman II(EO Number for smog), put the big block injectors in the TBI unit and tune the computer - and I forget the exact cam specs. They are very well running packages, make about 250hp at the tires with the TBI manifold being the bottleneck - if you do a carb conversion its an instant 40hp increase.

The Holley TBI manifold will pick you up some over the factory, but not much.

I can look up the cam we use tomorrow.
Nate
Engine Machinist
User avatar
needforspeed66gt
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1834
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 5:18 pm
Location: North Bay, California

Postby alexwelsh » Wed Sep 26, 2007 6:53 am

Pick a cam with a duration of no more than 220 @ .050 with a lobe center as far apart as you can (114 works well). This will give you a good vacuum signal so the MAP sensor won't go nuts. Better heads (like Vortecs) are a good idea. There are few options for intake manifolds, but your motor will be mild enough that a manifold change won't give you phenominal results anyway. There are changes you can do on the TBI unit that will give good results (injector spacers, BBC injectors, profiled inlet vanes). Free up the exhaust, but don't go too big on the tube diameter. Believe it or not, a single 3" works better than two 2.5s with a TBI.
alexwelsh
Member
Member
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 10:12 am

Postby gmc406 » Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:57 pm

I have a 91 GMC with 406 small block. I'm using a larger Comp cam with 1.6 rockers. As long as you have somebody to re-tune your chip, you can run whatever you want. I run 13.1's at 2500 feet. The truck runs well on the street and is good on fuel too.
Last edited by gmc406 on Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
gmc406
Member
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Sask Canada

Postby jmarkaudio » Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:35 pm

If you are talking about using the stock computer and chip, you don't want to deviate too much. It will compensate for small changes, not large ones. This is why the cam company cams are not much different than the factory cam.
Mark Whitener
http://racingfuelsystems.myfunforum.org
____

Good work isn't cheap and cheap work can't be good.
User avatar
jmarkaudio
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 3599
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:26 am
Location: Florida

Postby F1Fever » Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:26 am

Is what really throws them out of tune is the map sensor reading all over the place and very low on vacuum correct? Couldn't a guy unhook the map sensor then the cpu will only run from the TPS, RPM and temp, correct?
User avatar
F1Fever
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1656
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:17 am
Location: Okla

Postby gmc406 » Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:31 am

F1Fever wrote:Is what really throws them out of tune is the map sensor reading all over the place and very low on vacuum correct? Couldn't a guy unhook the map sensor then the cpu will only run from the TPS, RPM and temp, correct?

The map sensor is what tells the CPU when the engine is under load, like when you put it in gear. By installing a larger cam, the vacuum drops, and the CPU will drop in more fuel. Getting your chip reprogrammed will counter-act this.
gmc406
Member
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Sask Canada

Postby F1Fever » Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:33 am

On a stock vehicle if the Map sensor is unplugged it has little effect on the driveability. :?:
User avatar
F1Fever
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1656
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:17 am
Location: Okla

tbi chevy cams

Postby ZIGGY » Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:55 am

Needfor...

If porting the stock tbi manifold was a viable option, I assume you would have said so (?). Same for adapting a carb manifold to the tbi ?
ZIGGY
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:15 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

Postby F1Fever » Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:59 am

I find this interesting as a couple weeks ago I played with the idea of a duntov 30-30 cam, highrise single plane and TBI, or possibly a lowrise 2x4 with dual TBI's. Then I came to my senses and got a vortec :wink:
User avatar
F1Fever
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1656
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:17 am
Location: Okla

Postby machine shop tom » Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:57 am

Anything more than 204-210 @.050 and tighter than 107 centerlines (at that duration) will be dicey with the stock TBI set up, which also doesn't like the added flow of Vor-Tec heads, either with or without a cam change.

tom
Pray for a secular future.

MSNBC's catch phrase is "Lean Forward". Shouldn't it be "Bend Over"?

Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
machine shop tom
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 2816
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:16 pm
Location: N L Michigan

Postby 482OLDS » Mon Nov 19, 2007 8:26 pm

I used a Lunati 207/213 .437/.454 on a 112 lsa in a stock .030 over 400 smallblock to replace the 350 in my 92 Chevy 1/2 ton.

Also went with stock Vortecs and a GMPP intake with Edelbrock shortys and 2 1/4 duals with no cats.

It wouldn't run right even after turning up the fuel pressure. I put stock 454 TBI injectors in it and it's almost perfect...

Great low end for towing was what I wanted and it works.

Im sure there would be a lot more up top with a good intake and carb though
:?
482OLDS
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Bolingbrook Illinois

Postby 1989TransAm » Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:16 pm

I don't know what your ultimate goals are but if you get a customized tune for the computer it opens up alot of opportunities. In fact I would just buget some money for a custom dyno tune as part of the upgrade.

That way you can maximize the gas milage, horsepower and drivability. Adding a cam, headers and an improved intake system will need a tune to get the most out of it.
1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 3454
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Postby ThomasL » Mon Nov 19, 2007 10:08 pm

I used a Crane HMV260 retarded 5 degrees to give the same event timing as their computor controlled cam. 3" single Exh, chip, K+N, valve bowl work. Works really well with the EGR unhooked, but has a real lean spot at idle if the EGR is operational. It needs a reprogram to fix that but I have an 03 6 liter now so I won't be doing anything more to it. Really happy with the power though.
User avatar
ThomasL
Member
Member
 
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 4:49 pm

Next

Return to Engine Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: cr480r, Cubic_Cleveland, goldmember63, jim_ss409, machinedave, mmwilson and 33 guests