The truth on bowl sizing
Moderator: Team
-
- New Member
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2024 10:41 am
- Location: Texas
The truth on bowl sizing
Ive been confused here recently over the topic of bowl sizing of a cylinder head, and as i wait for my flowbench to get here and discover for myself, i figured i would pick yalls brain. I have been told both ways of this argument, first that you need to add a bunch of volume to the bowl in order to slow the airspeed down to get better atomization and a better discharge from the short size and valve opening. I have also been told that you need to minimize bowl volume to keep average velocity up approching the throat. So what are yalls tips andtruths about bowl sizing.Feel that both could be true in the end, but overall i feel like you need to retain a taper from the opening if the runner to the throat, what do yall think.
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
Is the same for every head?
Channel About My diy Projects & Reviews https://www.youtube.com/c/BOOTdiy
I know as much as I can learn and try to keep an open mind to anything!
If I didn't overthink stuff I wouldn't be on speedtalk!
I know as much as I can learn and try to keep an open mind to anything!
If I didn't overthink stuff I wouldn't be on speedtalk!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 2283
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:22 am
- Location: brisbane AUSTRALIA
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
It's a balancing act to try and turn air/ fuel some say make bowl 100 - 105% of valve diameter, some guys blow the bowl out big and install bigger valve to sell flow bench numbers.
There is no correct answer or one size fits all.
You have to test for your application, the only advice I can offer is when you get your bench is don't chase CFM, if the correct size,shape is done the CFM should be there.
There is no correct answer or one size fits all.
You have to test for your application, the only advice I can offer is when you get your bench is don't chase CFM, if the correct size,shape is done the CFM should be there.
steve c
"Pretty don't make power"
"Pretty don't make power"
-
- Guru
- Posts: 2694
- Joined: Fri Jan 09, 2009 8:51 pm
- Location: Australia
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
Depends entirely on the port shape.
A low port with a big turn angle needs a bigger bowl, a raised runner with less turn angle doesn't need as much bowl.
A low port with a big turn angle needs a bigger bowl, a raised runner with less turn angle doesn't need as much bowl.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4609
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
I hope your flow bench purchase comes with a Pito tube?
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:25 pm
- Location:
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
Lots smarter guys on here than me, but just what heads I have done and flowed, and then built and run on a dyno, the air speed over the short turn is more important than bowl sizing. If you can use a piece of thread on a welding rod and you can stick that thread flat on a short turn and keep the speed down to 400 fps or a little less is seems like they run good. I have seen a couple CNC heads that would back up at higher lifts and most of the time a little time blending the cutter marks and gently shaping the short turn while keeping an eye on the air speed does the trick.Dylan Wilson wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:58 pm Ive been confused here recently over the topic of bowl sizing of a cylinder head, and as i wait for my flowbench to get here and discover for myself, i figured i would pick yalls brain. I have been told both ways of this argument, first that you need to add a bunch of volume to the bowl in order to slow the airspeed down to get better atomization and a better discharge from the short size and valve opening. I have also been told that you need to minimize bowl volume to keep average velocity up approching the throat. So what are yalls tips andtruths about bowl sizing.Feel that both could be true in the end, but overall i feel like you need to retain a taper from the opening if the runner to the throat, what do yall think.
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
Well explained in Eric's latest video.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4609
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
Sorry make that pitot tube?
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
Here are the results of an engine builder that did not favor big bowls, there are some images of port molds some where in there as well.Dylan Wilson wrote: ↑Thu Feb 15, 2024 1:58 pm Ive been confused here recently over the topic of bowl sizing of a cylinder head, and as i wait for my flowbench to get here and discover for myself, i figured i would pick yalls brain. I have been told both ways of this argument, first that you need to add a bunch of volume to the bowl in order to slow the airspeed down to get better atomization and a better discharge from the short size and valve opening. I have also been told that you need to minimize bowl volume to keep average velocity up approching the throat. So what are yalls tips andtruths about bowl sizing.Feel that both could be true in the end, but overall i feel like you need to retain a taper from the opening if the runner to the throat, what do yall think.
viewtopic.php?t=51911
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
One follow up to this is what % of valve are we defining as Big vs Small?
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
-
- Vendor
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2012 1:28 pm
- Location: KS
- Contact:
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
I like big bowls...
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
You forgot to add "And I can not lie"
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:32 pm
- Location:
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
I haven’t seen much benefit in increasing bowl volume. I’m curious about those who have. Does it help the short turn?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1482
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:32 pm
- Location:
Re: The truth on bowl sizing
Good question. If the flow is good at .600 but goes backwards at .650 lift on the flow bench will it do the same thing on a running engine if the velocity is lower in real world? I think I'd rather have 20cfm more at .400 when the piston is pulling hard than a 20cfm gain at full lift. Just guesses here...
Pro question poster.