F/T cam with tool steel lifter

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Superstock1976
New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2023 9:55 am
Location: 56209

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by Superstock1976 »

CamKing wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 2:00 pm Bolt pattern is the same
I just tried it and there different pattern is smaller.
User avatar
Tom68
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 2584
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 3:43 am
Location: VIC OZ

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by Tom68 »

Factory roller bolt pattern is on a smaller base circle.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
turbo camino
Expert
Expert
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun Aug 10, 2008 11:51 am
Location:

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by turbo camino »

The OE stepped nose bolt pattern is smaller than the older or retrofit roller pattern.
DON'T PANIC
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10718
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by CamKing »

Superstock1976 wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 2:08 pm
CamKing wrote: Sat Jan 20, 2024 2:00 pm Bolt pattern is the same
I just tried it and there different pattern is smaller.
OK, then those were made for an OEM Hydraulic roller block, with the stepped front journal.
I didn't see that in the description.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
Tuner
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3256
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 5:26 am
Location:

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by Tuner »

CamKing wrote: Sun Dec 17, 2023 1:17 pm It looks to me, that the cam was too far forward in the block, or the cam had too much taper.
Look at the wear patters on the lobes. To me, it looks like the contact area is moving off the side of the lobe.
Is the radius on the lifter face incorrect for the angle of the cam lobe?
sjre
Member
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:38 am
Location:

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by sjre »

I recently saw I think it was Billy Godbold who said it happens from fracturing under the surface hardness then it separates and flakes .
tuffxf
Pro
Pro
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 7:34 am
Location: Central Qld Australia

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by tuffxf »

Gday,
My two cents, you should have been fine, make sure the cam lobe is sitting in the right spot as Mike has said, lose the tool steel lifter and use a good edm old school lifter and don't nitride it what ever you do.
You have nothing binding at full lift?
What oil?
Cheers
BCjohnny
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 6:07 pm
Location: Black Country, England

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by BCjohnny »

sjre wrote:I recently saw I think it was Billy Godbold who said it happens from fracturing under the surface hardness then it separates and flakes .
Increasingly the ability to not understand the material limitations of what the designer is dealing with seem to come to the fore .......

Creme Brule
Stingr69
New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2023 1:17 pm
Location: AR

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by Stingr69 »

I recently lost a cam just the same way. Had it apart at 1k miles for a different reason and found mine a little less damaged that the OP's cam. Howards solid FT cam and Howards EDM lifters. They were completely uninterested in seeing the damage when I called them about it. Blamed the break in oil. I suspected maybe too much over the nose spring pressure. Who knows? Lifters were not damaged so I had Powell Machine resurface them so maybe reuse them some day. Quite a few lobes showed damage.
20230510_103654.jpg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Arthur
Member
Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 6:21 pm
Location:
Contact:

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by Arthur »

Break in oil on flat tappets is the greatest marketing deception since ZDDP
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10718
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by CamKing »

Arthur wrote: Thu Jan 25, 2024 6:27 pm Break in oil on flat tappets is the greatest marketing deception since ZDDP
Do you want to elaborate, or just make ridiculously false statements, with nothing to back it up?
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10718
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by CamKing »

Stingr69 wrote: Thu Jan 25, 2024 5:37 pm Blamed the break in oil. I suspected maybe too much over the nose spring pressure.
In most cases, the issue is too much spring pressure over the nose.
We recommend the spring pressure at max lift to be between 240-280#.
When running these break-in pressures, and PennGrade1 30w break-in oil, we see a 99+% success rate.
Some people get away with running more pressure, or regular oil, but they're taking a big risk.
Almost every break-in failure I've seen, was because the spring pressure was too high, or they went with the same synthetic oil they normally run.
The last one we lost, the engine builder told me he didn't believe in lowering the spring pressure for break-in. I wonder if he believes in it now.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
Stingr69
New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Aug 28, 2023 1:17 pm
Location: AR

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by Stingr69 »

Cam was broken in on single spring. Over the nose was around 350# final (per the numbers) with both springs installed. Put a hydraulic FT in for now, but NO JOY. Going back to solid FT when I get some free time.
Steve Salesky
Member
Member
Posts: 75
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 8:26 pm
Location: Von Ormy, TX.

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by Steve Salesky »

CamKing wrote: Fri Jan 26, 2024 10:58 am
Stingr69 wrote: Thu Jan 25, 2024 5:37 pm Blamed the break in oil. I suspected maybe too much over the nose spring pressure.
In most cases, the issue is too much spring pressure over the nose.
We recommend the spring pressure at max lift to be between 240-280#.
When running these break-in pressures, and PennGrade1 30w break-in oil, we see a 99+% success rate.
Some people get away with running more pressure, or regular oil, but they're taking a big risk.
Almost every break-in failure I've seen, was because the spring pressure was too high, or they went with the same synthetic oil they normally run.
The last one we lost, the engine builder told me he didn't believe in lowering the spring pressure for break-in. I wonder if he believes in it now.
AM curious would you recommend a lower spring pressure range for break in using a 1.73 rocker ratio vs a 1.5 ratio?
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10718
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: F/T cam with tool steel lifter

Post by CamKing »

Steve Salesky wrote: Mon Jan 29, 2024 7:40 pm
AM curious would you recommend a lower spring pressure range for break in using a 1.73 rocker ratio vs a 1.5 ratio?
Yes, you would want to be closer to the 240#, than the 280#
Shoot for 230#-260#
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
Post Reply