Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
Moderator: Team
Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
Ok, I have this Milodon 3-gear brand new. Came with some horse trading. I’m seriously thinking of using it. Why? 1,000#+/- spring pressure on Super Stock engine, I have a 55mm cam core by LSM that has the keyway in the wrong position. Basically, have to retard the cam 8° to be 1.5° advanced.
A MAJOR pain in the you-know-what to degree and not something you really want to change once you arrive at an ICL.
The Milodon has what looks like an easy method of changing the ICL once you establish a straight up ICL.
The old “increase in camshaft harmonics = loss in HP”. According to Milodon, this is absolutely not true. Of course they are the salesmen.
The 4-gear assemblies apparently are the culprit for HP loss.
I have searched the internet hi and low and I can not find substantive evidence (real dyno numbers or before / after track times) that support this.
So I’m somewhat thinking that the “facts” (or wives tale) just keep repeating themselves across the internet.
Or am I wrong? I’d like to hear from somebody that can support this HP loss. Timing belt is not an available option with AMC. Thanks.
A MAJOR pain in the you-know-what to degree and not something you really want to change once you arrive at an ICL.
The Milodon has what looks like an easy method of changing the ICL once you establish a straight up ICL.
The old “increase in camshaft harmonics = loss in HP”. According to Milodon, this is absolutely not true. Of course they are the salesmen.
The 4-gear assemblies apparently are the culprit for HP loss.
I have searched the internet hi and low and I can not find substantive evidence (real dyno numbers or before / after track times) that support this.
So I’m somewhat thinking that the “facts” (or wives tale) just keep repeating themselves across the internet.
Or am I wrong? I’d like to hear from somebody that can support this HP loss. Timing belt is not an available option with AMC. Thanks.
NHRA SS/G
1970 AMC AMX - 390 4-speed
Advanced Clutches - Red Line Racing Cams
1970 AMC AMX - 390 4-speed
Advanced Clutches - Red Line Racing Cams
-
- Pro
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 6:28 pm
- Location: Tallahassee Florida USofA
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
Offset key on the cam AND crank for the 8?
Sorry, no help on chain vs gear drive loss.
Sorry, no help on chain vs gear drive loss.
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
So far I believe this is a good cam, other than the key issue. So I want to keep using it.
NHRA SS/G
1970 AMC AMX - 390 4-speed
Advanced Clutches - Red Line Racing Cams
1970 AMC AMX - 390 4-speed
Advanced Clutches - Red Line Racing Cams
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
viewtopic.php?t=65719&start=15
Well it ca\n't be a power killer, there's a gazillion factory gear drives been made over the last century and a half.
Well it ca\n't be a power killer, there's a gazillion factory gear drives been made over the last century and a half.
Ignorance leads to confidence more often than knowledge does.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Nah, I'm not leaving myself out of the ignorant brigade....at times.
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
Tom68 - Can’t believe I didn’t find that. Thanks!
NHRA SS/G
1970 AMC AMX - 390 4-speed
Advanced Clutches - Red Line Racing Cams
1970 AMC AMX - 390 4-speed
Advanced Clutches - Red Line Racing Cams
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
Your mind is set on running it, so run it and see if the "wives tales" or wrong!Jeff Lee wrote: ↑Wed May 10, 2023 11:18 pm Ok, I have this Milodon 3-gear brand new. Came with some horse trading. I’m seriously thinking of using it. Why? 1,000#+/- spring pressure on Super Stock engine, I have a 55mm cam core by LSM that has the keyway in the wrong position. Basically, have to retard the cam 8° to be 1.5° advanced.
A MAJOR pain in the you-know-what to degree and not something you really want to change once you arrive at an ICL.
The Milodon has what looks like an easy method of changing the ICL once you establish a straight up ICL.
The old “increase in camshaft harmonics = loss in HP”. According to Milodon, this is absolutely not true. Of course they are the salesmen.
The 4-gear assemblies apparently are the culprit for HP loss.
I have searched the internet hi and low and I can not find substantive evidence (real dyno numbers or before / after track times) that support this.
So I’m somewhat thinking that the “facts” (or wives tale) just keep repeating themselves across the internet.
Or am I wrong? I’d like to hear from somebody that can support this HP loss. Timing belt is not an available option with AMC. Thanks.
But you will only know if it looses power if your willing to test one vs the other, no one could convince you of that even if they posted dyno numbers.
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1947
- Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:25 pm
- Location:
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
I always thought the big HP advantage of gear drive over chain was the chain stretch and cam retard at high rpm's. Not apples to apples because of the rpms run, but scores of diesel engines have gear drives, they do it for the accuracy of cam and injection pump events. I don't know how to scientifically prove it, but it seems a roller chain would just also have to have less friction loss compared to a straight cut gear. As mentioned only true way would be to switch on a dyno and see. But could it be more than say 5HP loss with the gear drive?
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
Some engines because of design gears are the only option, some tests have shown loose belts will only retard the cam at higher rpm increasing top end power.rebelrouser wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 8:06 am I always thought the big HP advantage of gear drive over chain was the chain stretch and cam retard at high rpm's. Not apples to apples because of the rpms run, but scores of diesel engines have gear drives, they do it for the accuracy of cam and injection pump events. I don't know how to scientifically prove it, but it seems a roller chain would just also have to have less friction loss compared to a straight cut gear. As mentioned only true way would be to switch on a dyno and see. But could it be more than say 5HP loss with the gear drive?
The biggest loss in power I have seen reported was 7 hp but I don't remember what system or engine combo.
Here are several articles talking about them, my personal experience with a Pete Jackson type was big fluctuations in timing and breaking the front main web out of my block on a 7000 rpm SBC.
https://www.bing.com/search?form=MOZSBR ... power+loss
Last edited by GARY C on Fri May 12, 2023 9:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 6390
- Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
- Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
- Contact:
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
We tested the Milodon three gear drive in the early 90's against a chain drive, (a belt drive was not legal in Trans-Am racing).
There was no apparent loss of power on those roller cammed, 310 cid Chevrolet small block engines; the rules had a rev limit of 8,200 RPM.
There was no apparent loss of power on those roller cammed, 310 cid Chevrolet small block engines; the rules had a rev limit of 8,200 RPM.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
Specialty engine building at its finest.
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
So you have used a junk gear drive and now condemn them all? Bad policy. Mostly belt drives are used for convenience. They are easier to degree (the gear drive isn’t hard, just different and you can’t line it up “dot to dot” to start” and it is easier to move cam timing on the dyno or even at the track.GARY C wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 8:47 amSome engines because of design gears are the only option, some tests have shown loose belts will only retard the cam at higher rpm increasing top end power.rebelrouser wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 8:06 am I always thought the big HP advantage of gear drive over chain was the chain stretch and cam retard at high rpm's. Not apples to apples because of the rpms run, but scores of diesel engines have gear drives, they do it for the accuracy of cam and injection pump events. I don't know how to scientifically prove it, but it seems a roller chain would just also have to have less friction loss compared to a straight cut gear. As mentioned only true way would be to switch on a dyno and see. But could it be more than say 5HP loss with the gear drive?
The biggest loss in power I have seen reported was 7 hp but I don't remember what system or engine combo.
Here are several articles talking about them, my personal experience with a Pete Jackson type was big fluctuations in timing and breaking the front main web out of my block on a 7000 rpm SBC.
https://www.bing.com/search?form=MOZSBR ... power+loss
Cup cars, Pro Stock, probably Comp Eliminator and maybe some Super Stock guys (I’d have to look to see if belt drives are legal is SS because I don’t remember) are about the only ones I can think of who would do that.
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
Where did I condemn them all? I simply stated my experience with the one style I have used and would not recommend to anyone.ClassAct wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 10:32 amSo you have used a junk gear drive and now condemn them all? Bad policy. Mostly belt drives are used for convenience. They are easier to degree (the gear drive isn’t hard, just different and you can’t line it up “dot to dot” to start” and it is easier to move cam timing on the dyno or even at the track.GARY C wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 8:47 amSome engines because of design gears are the only option, some tests have shown loose belts will only retard the cam at higher rpm increasing top end power.rebelrouser wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 8:06 am I always thought the big HP advantage of gear drive over chain was the chain stretch and cam retard at high rpm's. Not apples to apples because of the rpms run, but scores of diesel engines have gear drives, they do it for the accuracy of cam and injection pump events. I don't know how to scientifically prove it, but it seems a roller chain would just also have to have less friction loss compared to a straight cut gear. As mentioned only true way would be to switch on a dyno and see. But could it be more than say 5HP loss with the gear drive?
The biggest loss in power I have seen reported was 7 hp but I don't remember what system or engine combo.
Here are several articles talking about them, my personal experience with a Pete Jackson type was big fluctuations in timing and breaking the front main web out of my block on a 7000 rpm SBC.
https://www.bing.com/search?form=MOZSBR ... power+loss
Cup cars, Pro Stock, probably Comp Eliminator and maybe some Super Stock guys (I’d have to look to see if belt drives are legal is SS because I don’t remember) are about the only ones I can think of who would do that.
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
In the early 80’s the multi position crank sprockets for AMC we’re in the wrong place… not enough advance.
I used Dumont broach and made my own.
I put the cam where I wanted it without crank key marked it and scribed the position broached it and presto exactly where I wanted it.
Any competent machinist / mechanic can do it.
All that is needed is an arbor press.
I used Dumont broach and made my own.
I put the cam where I wanted it without crank key marked it and scribed the position broached it and presto exactly where I wanted it.
Any competent machinist / mechanic can do it.
All that is needed is an arbor press.
-
- HotPass
- Posts: 3472
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:42 pm
- Location:
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
Cup guys had issues with the NextGen and packaging the steering rack, which resulted in overheating belts / breaking.ClassAct wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 10:32 amSo you have used a junk gear drive and now condemn them all? Bad policy. Mostly belt drives are used for convenience. They are easier to degree (the gear drive isn’t hard, just different and you can’t line it up “dot to dot” to start” and it is easier to move cam timing on the dyno or even at the track.GARY C wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 8:47 amSome engines because of design gears are the only option, some tests have shown loose belts will only retard the cam at higher rpm increasing top end power.rebelrouser wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 8:06 am I always thought the big HP advantage of gear drive over chain was the chain stretch and cam retard at high rpm's. Not apples to apples because of the rpms run, but scores of diesel engines have gear drives, they do it for the accuracy of cam and injection pump events. I don't know how to scientifically prove it, but it seems a roller chain would just also have to have less friction loss compared to a straight cut gear. As mentioned only true way would be to switch on a dyno and see. But could it be more than say 5HP loss with the gear drive?
The biggest loss in power I have seen reported was 7 hp but I don't remember what system or engine combo.
Here are several articles talking about them, my personal experience with a Pete Jackson type was big fluctuations in timing and breaking the front main web out of my block on a 7000 rpm SBC.
https://www.bing.com/search?form=MOZSBR ... power+loss
Cup cars, Pro Stock, probably Comp Eliminator and maybe some Super Stock guys (I’d have to look to see if belt drives are legal is SS because I don’t remember) are about the only ones I can think of who would do that.
-Bob
-
- Guru
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
- Location: NC
Re: Prove it to me....Camshaft Gear Drive is a HP Killer
That was mainly due to belt size and material.hoffman900 wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 12:23 pmCup guys had issues with the NextGen and packaging the steering rack, which resulted in overheating belts / breaking.ClassAct wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 10:32 amSo you have used a junk gear drive and now condemn them all? Bad policy. Mostly belt drives are used for convenience. They are easier to degree (the gear drive isn’t hard, just different and you can’t line it up “dot to dot” to start” and it is easier to move cam timing on the dyno or even at the track.GARY C wrote: ↑Fri May 12, 2023 8:47 am
Some engines because of design gears are the only option, some tests have shown loose belts will only retard the cam at higher rpm increasing top end power.
The biggest loss in power I have seen reported was 7 hp but I don't remember what system or engine combo.
Here are several articles talking about them, my personal experience with a Pete Jackson type was big fluctuations in timing and breaking the front main web out of my block on a 7000 rpm SBC.
https://www.bing.com/search?form=MOZSBR ... power+loss
Cup cars, Pro Stock, probably Comp Eliminator and maybe some Super Stock guys (I’d have to look to see if belt drives are legal is SS because I don’t remember) are about the only ones I can think of who would do that.