by machine shop tom » Sat Oct 06, 2007 9:43 am
Jimivice certainly brings up a good point. How much effect can a slot, groove, or trench have on a combustion burn that starts at 34 degrees before TDC? Enging speed, dome configuration, chamber shape, groove size, etc., will all have differing effects on burn efficiency. What works well in one combination or set of circumstances may actually be a detriment in another. This is an area where one change at-a-time, back-to-back dyno testing is probably the best way to evaluate any possible benefits to changes like piston or head modifications.
Some of the supposed benefits of Sommender Singh's grooves may actually be attributes of other, unrecognized modifications. That's why I believe the jury is still out on Singh's modifications. The same thing probably applies to piston grooving.
I remember seeing the old Crane Fireball SBC heads with BIG, ROUND exhaust ports. Didn't see them any more after flow benches made their way into regular use. I imagine that many of the old, now NEW modifictions will be finally properly tested in proper manners and conditons.
tom
Pray for a secular future.
Blessed be the teleprompter that tells the president to urinate first, and THEN unzip his trousers.