Just be aware that the type of "traction bar" illustrated on that page is not transmitting forces in the same way as yours.
With the one on that page (the old, traditional style), when the axle starts wrapping up, the rubber bumper contacts the spring and stops further movement. The link is not in tension or compression but rather is in bending. Your lower link rod cannot transmit bending but does transmit tensile or compressive loads, as the case may be.
2seater wrote:Lovely work. Not really related, but isn't that directional tire running backwards?
......................
Too bad the car ran the same sixty foot time as before! At least I learned something.(Trunk ballast is king with street radials)
Both. At the time I raced with street radials, the trunk ballast was about 160 lbs, being 100 on the passenger side and 60lbs in the driver side. Weight transfer was the prime goal, it worked like as spected, but we ran at 1/8mile straight of race circuit slight uphill and the grip was terrible.
When I relocated the battery to the trunk the car were five hundredths faster.
'71 Z28 street strip car
Pump gas All motor SBC 427
3308 lbs-29x10.5 Hoosiers
NEW BEST ET
1.38 60' / 4.05 330' / 6.32@111.25mph
I hate to be a drag, but I am a firm believer in the good old fashioned "slapper bars"!
I made mine such that they slapped right in the middle of the bottom of the front spring eyes! I used 1/2" bolts and nuts so that I could close or open the gaps to tune them.
I also mounted coil-over, shock overload springs that I used to tune as well as set my rear ride height!
And I did have a 3/4" diameter rear sway bar.
My rear end was noisy to say the least, but once I had tuned it, my car left like a rabbit out of the chute at the dog track!
I wouldn't be too worried about the strength of your custom bars since they are beefy two force members. Where you'll probably see failure first if the forces get high enough, is the front fastening arrangement. That bolt has a lot of distance to cover between the two mounting points, and is likely to bend long before your caltrac bars do. (This is based off the last pic of the last set of pics).
Rizzle wrote:I wouldn't be too worried about the strength of your custom bars since they are beefy two force members. Where you'll probably see failure first if the forces get high enough, is the front fastening arrangement. That bolt has a lot of distance to cover between the two mounting points, and is likely to bend long before your caltrac bars do. (This is based off the last pic of the last set of pics).
Yep. At the time I assembled the bars I didn't like the distance triangle-to-triangle the M12 10.9 bolt had to cover. Even with the two billet SAE 1020 bushings with about 18mm O.D. and torqued to 50lbs, they aren't "pretty to the eye".
As this bolt tensile strenght is very high, I probably will fabricate new hardened bushings so I can torque them to 80-90 lbs without distortion.
Thanks for reply.
'71 Z28 street strip car
Pump gas All motor SBC 427
3308 lbs-29x10.5 Hoosiers
NEW BEST ET
1.38 60' / 4.05 330' / 6.32@111.25mph
pdq67 wrote:I hate to be a drag, but I am a firm believer in the good old fashioned "slapper bars"!
I made mine such that they slapped right in the middle of the bottom of the front spring eyes! I used 1/2" bolts and nuts so that I could close or open the gaps to tune them.
I also mounted coil-over, shock overload springs that I used to tune as well as set my rear ride height!
And I did have a 3/4" diameter rear sway bar.
My rear end was noisy to say the least, but once I had tuned it, my car left like a rabbit out of the chute at the dog track!
pdq67
I can't disagree with you, specially after seeing some pics of the Grumpy's Toys.
'71 Z28 street strip car
Pump gas All motor SBC 427
3308 lbs-29x10.5 Hoosiers
NEW BEST ET
1.38 60' / 4.05 330' / 6.32@111.25mph