What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Tech questions that don't fit above forums

Moderator: Team

What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby Christian_K » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:24 pm

I just found this via google... :shock: :?
http://mototuneusa.com/homework.htm
http://mototuneusa.com/think_fast.htm

Is that total BS or what do you think about it?

Thanks and best Regards, Christian
Christian_K
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby SWR » Wed Mar 21, 2012 4:57 pm

A lot of people say it's not done correctly and that it can be done in a better fashion, which is true.. but yes, a lot of ports these days are too big. So Epoxy has become yet another tool for more power.
-Bjørn

"Impossible? Nah...just needs more development time"
User avatar
SWR
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 2589
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Norway

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby roadrunner » Thu Mar 22, 2012 11:53 pm

Christian_K wrote:I just found this via google... :shock: :?
http://mototuneusa.com/homework.htm
http://mototuneusa.com/think_fast.htm

Is that total BS or what do you think about it?

Thanks and best Regards, Christian

Great link Christian!
The moral majority is neither!
roadrunner
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:32 am
Location: melbourne Australia

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby Christian_K » Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:47 pm

Thanks, but isn't what he describes the total opposite of what is generally taught?
And might it even be the case only for very high RPMs, as he describes it primarily for Bike engines that rev past 10.000RPM?

-Christian-
Christian_K
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 5
Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 8:00 pm
Location: Germany

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby roadrunner » Mon Mar 26, 2012 3:43 am

Christian_K wrote:Thanks, but isn't what he describes the total opposite of what is generally taught?
And might it even be the case only for very high RPMs, as he describes it primarily for Bike engines that rev past 10.000RPM?

-Christian-

I would think that it depends on the individual engine, from what I understand intake velocity is very important for good cylinder filling!
The moral majority is neither!
roadrunner
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 202
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 12:32 am
Location: melbourne Australia

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby loudandproud » Wed Apr 18, 2012 3:55 pm

I know numerous R1 owners that have had this professionally done and the results were noticable. On the dyno it wasnt dramatic but they noticed alot more midrange.

I never rode one before and after so I cant vouch for it.
"Buying parts I dont need, with money that I dont have, to impress people that I dont know".
User avatar
loudandproud
Member
Member
 
Posts: 199
Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 8:35 pm
Location: Mechanicsburg, PA

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby crazyman » Thu Apr 19, 2012 9:58 pm

An old briggs and stratton and a new briggs and stratton 5hp both have like an inch port, where a 5hp honda has a 1/2" port. I'm of the school of thought that velocity is key, which is why IMO 305 heads on a mildly cammed 350 run so well.

The honda revs quicker than a briggs too. All stock push mower engines. The faster an engine free revs, the faster it will accelerate under load, IMHO....
crazyman
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 794
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 3:53 am
Location: Yorkville, Illinois (60 miles SW of Chicago)

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby jed » Fri Apr 20, 2012 8:38 pm

If I rember right There is no mention of horse power.
The comentary is on how much better the bike felt and pulled comming out of turns and it was easier to ride due to throtle response ECT.
IF the ports were to big to begin with, making them smaller and increasing the velocity would produce exactially what he says.
Erland can probably speed to this, he does a lot of cycle heads.
jed
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 225
Joined: Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:18 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby SWR » Sat Apr 21, 2012 4:56 am

jed wrote:If I rember right There is no mention of horse power.
The comentary is on how much better the bike felt and pulled comming out of turns and it was easier to ride due to throtle response ECT.
IF the ports were to big to begin with, making them smaller and increasing the velocity would produce exactially what he says.
Erland can probably speed to this, he does a lot of cycle heads.

There's a dyno sheet... and they do gain hp.
-Bjørn

"Impossible? Nah...just needs more development time"
User avatar
SWR
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 2589
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 5:39 pm
Location: Norway

Re: What do you think about reducing Port diameters?

Postby sc2dave » Sun Apr 22, 2012 12:34 pm

a different idea here,but,has anyone done this to their m/c carbs or knew someone who did? I can't find anyone who has!! http://www.thumperfaq.com/downloads/JamesNOW!.pdf .more free horsepower!!
sc2dave
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 428
Joined: Tue May 24, 2005 9:45 pm
Location: Los Angeles, in The People's republic of Kalifornia


Return to Other Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests