Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby razor66 » Fri Mar 23, 2012 8:19 pm

540 RAT wrote:
razor66 wrote:Any thoughts on why there would be so much difference in the results from your testing between these two oils that look to be the same brand other than the viscosity weight rating?

1. 5W30 Pennzoil Ultra, API SM = 115,612 psi
I have not been able to find this oil with the latest API SN certification. The bottle says, “No leading synthetic oil provides better wear protection”. For once, a product’s hype turns out to be true.
zinc = 806 ppm
phos = 812 ppm
moly = 66 ppm

31. 5W20 Pennzoil Ultra, API SM = 86,034 psi
I have not been able to find this oil with the latest API SN certification.
zinc = TBD
phos = TBD
moly = TBD


Yeah, that was one of the surprises during the testing. Not all like brand oils fell into line like you might expect. But repeat testing at different times showed the same results over and over again. So, the numbers are what they are. Only the oil company in question or a very expensive forensic lab test could reveal for sure why they are different.

Though in some of my conversations with the Royal Purple Engineers, they told me that the technology is not in place to absolutely guarantee that oil from different batches will be "exactly" the same. And that normal lab tests may show differences even for oil that would otherwise seem like it should be identical.

Their statement really surprised me, because I thought in this modern 21st Century computer controlled age we live in, that everything "would be" identical. So, perhaps that may account for the differences. And that's all the more reason to do the kind of testing I did. That way you don't have to just "assume" that similar oils will have similar capabilities. I plan on testing the oil I use, maybe once a year to see if it is still similar to what it was before.

And speaking of repeat testing at different times showing the same results over and over again. I was so shocked that the winning 5W30 Pennzoil Ultra, API SM, could be so good, that I tested it probably twice as many times as I tested all the other oils. And every time it tested extremely well. It simply would NOT test bad. It really is good oil, and I will be putting it in my own 800 HP, 540ci BBC.


Yes, I was definitely surprised to see that much difference (~30,000 psi) with just such a small change in the viscosity between the two. I would also think that they would have tighter control from batch to batch, but perhaps not and that may be where the difference lies. Your spot testing should detect this if you start seeing significant changes in the results from the 5W30 you plan to use. I would of course like to have seen the results between these two weights of the same oil closer to one another as some may want or need to run a different weight oil in their engine and depending on this the Penzoil Ultra, API SM might very well not be the better choice. I look forward to seeing some more of your future testing results. Thanks for posting them.
razor66
Member
Member
 
Posts: 162
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2010 7:10 pm
Location: NW Arkansas

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby boxcartommie22 » Sat Mar 24, 2012 10:36 am

sorry all, i think you all are wasting too much time on a bogus test!!,there are many like this that don't mean squat. i use red line and motul and consider them to be the very best thats out there and would never ever use anything by pennzoil!! if one does his /her maintainence on there vehicles then your vehicle will take care of you.
2010 Ford F150 SVT Raptor,Red Line,LAT,K&P,CAI, Stainless Steel Oil Filter. 2007 Mercury Grandmarquis,Dual Exhaust, Red Line,Stainless Steel Filter,LAT
2001 Lincoln Continental 4.6 DOHC, Cat back exhaust,Red Line,LAT
boxcartommie22
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 4:31 pm

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby PWMAX » Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:42 am

This should be a sticky.
PWMAX
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 500
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:55 pm
Location: st.paul,mn

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby Kevin Johnson » Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:45 pm

Was a new test ring used with each new flat test specimem ?
Kevin Johnson
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:41 am

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby Bob Hollinshead » Sun Mar 25, 2012 7:22 am

I think I see where Kevin is going with that question, BTTT
Pro question poster.
Bob Hollinshead
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 662
Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:32 pm

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby Kevin Johnson » Sun Mar 25, 2012 8:47 am

If you do not change the ring then how do you exclude that additives from previous tests do not adhere to it ? That is a big issue, for one.

Second, it is well known that galling, for example, once started, is a continuing destructive process. It would not be a fair test to see if a given lubricant would prevent galling from beginning in the first place between two surfaces if a galling situation already existed on one of them. It is like using new tappets on an already damaged cam.

I do not know that this is the situation but it is an important experimental question.
Kevin Johnson
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 2254
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 5:41 am

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby rally » Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:01 am

RAT 540 rebuttal, answer this important question, people in here have the right to know things if you havent tested them. If i cant gain any horsepower switching to the Ultra 5W-30 PENNZOIL i dont find it good enough to switch. I drag race, and looking for the best horsepower numbers an oil can put up against another oil. I understand that Pennzoil Ultra is good in that test, but is it for an engine driven on the street for months without an oil change. In drag racing form again its about horsepower and what oil will give me the best. Royal Purple from what i been told is the best in this class of oils.
rally
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:08 pm

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby Warp Speed » Sun Mar 25, 2012 12:33 pm

Image
Warp Speed
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 915
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 12:46 pm
Location: NC

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby 540 RAT » Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:14 pm

BrazilianZ28Camaro wrote:
540 RAT wrote:
And speaking of repeat testing at different times showing the same results over and over again. I was so shocked that the winning 5W30 Pennzoil Ultra, API SM, could be so good, that I tested it probably twice as many times as I tested all the other oils. And every time it tested extremely well. It simply would NOT test bad. It really is good oil, and I will be putting it in my own 800 HP, 540ci BBC.


RAT540

Would not each type of oil have its own needed temperature and time to be exposed to the metal (ring in this case) to fully adhere its melecules to the surface and have maximum performance??


No, each oil adhered nicely to the ring and resembled an "O" ring wrapped around the test ring.
Member:
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers)
540 RAT
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:21 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby 540 RAT » Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:20 pm

Kevin Johnson wrote:Was a new test ring used with each new flat test specimem ?


The test specimens are not flat, they are a small solid cylinder shape. And of course a new surface was provided for each test. As for the test "ring", its surface was reprepped with sand paper between each test, so that a fresh surface was used each time.
Member:
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers)
540 RAT
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:21 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby 540 RAT » Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:23 pm

Kevin Johnson wrote:If you do not change the ring then how do you exclude that additives from previous tests do not adhere to it ? That is a big issue, for one.

Second, it is well known that galling, for example, once started, is a continuing destructive process. It would not be a fair test to see if a given lubricant would prevent galling from beginning in the first place between two surfaces if a galling situation already existed on one of them. It is like using new tappets on an already damaged cam.

I do not know that this is the situation but it is an important experimental question.


There was no galling present or carried over. The ring was reprepped each time with sand paper and inspected with a magnifying glass, all the way around, for anything that might not have been seen by the naked eye alone. In addition to that, the ring was cleaned thoroughly with brake cleaner after it was sanded.
Member:
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers)
540 RAT
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:21 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby 540 RAT » Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:25 pm

boxcartommie22 wrote:sorry all, i think you all are wasting too much time on a bogus test!!,there are many like this that don't mean squat. i use red line and motul and consider them to be the very best thats out there and would never ever use anything by pennzoil!! if one does his /her maintainence on there vehicles then your vehicle will take care of you.


Please provide technical data to show us why you like the oils you like, and why you don't like the oils you don't like.
Member:
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers)
540 RAT
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:21 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby 540 RAT » Mon Mar 26, 2012 2:30 pm

rally wrote:RAT 540 rebuttal, answer this important question, people in here have the right to know things if you havent tested them. If i cant gain any horsepower switching to the Ultra 5W-30 PENNZOIL i dont find it good enough to switch. I drag race, and looking for the best horsepower numbers an oil can put up against another oil. I understand that Pennzoil Ultra is good in that test, but is it for an engine driven on the street for months without an oil change. In drag racing form again its about horsepower and what oil will give me the best. Royal Purple from what i been told is the best in this class of oils.


Reread my write-up. I said that the testing compares "load carrying capacity/film strength", which indicates an oils ability to prevent wear. But the testing does NOT indicate anything about HP increases or decreases. Those two things will not always go hand in hand. I clearly stated that.

For max HP, the thinner viscosities of Royal Purple XPR (Extreme Performance Racing) oil, have shown time and time again that they make the most HP.
Member:
SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers)
540 RAT
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 7:21 pm
Location: Southern California

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby rally » Mon Mar 26, 2012 5:33 pm

RAT 540 your test looks great on street driven engines that will go without an oil change for at least 10.000 miles. Sure that Ultra is good, but i want extra horsepower anyway i can get it. Royal Purple racing oil fits my needs. If Pennzoil Ultra could compare in horsepower numbers or better its a no brainer, i buy that product. I see nothing out there that suggest that its a horsepower advantage to use it. Royal Purple is my choice on the strip.
rally
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 529
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:08 pm

Re: Motor Oil Wear Test Results – Caution, VERY long

Postby af2 » Mon Mar 26, 2012 7:37 pm

Kind of funny that I never looked as oil no more than being a crank saver? I guess I am missing something. #-o
GURU is only a name.
Adam
User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 5207
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

PreviousNext

Return to Engine Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cubic_Cleveland, dsteph79, psa and 8 guests