Moderator: Team









JWRE wrote:"The Engineer", I'm not taking sides in this debate one way or another, but it would be cool if you did a track test to compare the Titan and your old intake. Who knows, maybe Tony will pay for the gaskets.



The Engineer wrote:JWRE wrote:"The Engineer", I'm not taking sides in this debate one way or another, but it would be cool if you did a track test to compare the Titan and your old intake. Who knows, maybe Tony will pay for the gaskets.
The reason I bought the Titan in the first place, was so I could have "out-of-the-box" performance! Specifically, not spend hours of work cleaning-up casting, or molding issues. Additionally, the casting off-sets in the plenum and runners (off-sets and shifts, from the two mold halves) would be almost impossible to correct.
So, now I've got a new cast aluminum intake that has been hand-ported and I'm very happy with it.
Warren


1989TransAm wrote:"Yeah, so which one made more power, the AFR or the Victor? What ci engine is it going on & what application? The cleanup looks nice, what did it cost you?"
I was wondering the same thing. He paid to have the Victor cleaned up but nothing with the AFR. I would think it would be a piece of cake to clean up the flash on a plastic intake manifold.

The Engineer wrote:FYI, I ordered a Titan and was very disappointed with the amount of burs and casting off-sets in the runners. This photo is out-of-the-box!






Users browsing this forum: benno318, Google [Bot], Greens Nice, Jarmo, Jer73, numboltz, sneukam, turbomad, upit and 14 guests