SpeedTalk Store - Opinion Columns

I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Open

Moderator: Team

I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Postby Engguy » Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:22 am

http://r-calfusa.com/news_releases/2011/110901-epa.htm

I'm just wondering where all the intelligent people are?
Isn't it funny that radiation is not bad? But everything else is?
Where in ..... are the oath takers?
Engguy
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1630
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:51 pm

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Postby Unkl Ian » Fri Sep 09, 2011 10:03 am

The intelligent people are obviously NOT in government.

Between this one, and the Gibson guitar saga, the Lunatics really have taken over the Asylum.
Just because you never studied the Laws of Physics,
doesn't mean they won't try to kick your ass.
Unkl Ian
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 2849
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:23 pm
Location: Just outside Toronto

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Postby Engguy » Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:24 am

I think they are in the gov, and following exactly what there controllers want them to do. Thats why everything is a farce. People vote for something and it means nothing because if it isn't what they want it is over turned, and you get what everyone voted against, its happened a bunch here. Sports stadiums are just one item.
So why the constant demonizing of complete non issues as far as things that are bad, and the complete quiet on the one thing that is
the most destructive. ie RADIATION ? And where are the ones that take the oath????? Is that just lip service too?
Engguy
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1630
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:51 pm

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Postby Rizzle » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:02 pm

http://www.epa.gov/region07/priorities/ ... id_hay.htm

figured I'd look into why EPA said hay was a pollutant. Turns out they didn't.
Rizzle
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:34 pm
Location: St. Catharines, Ont

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Postby machine shop tom » Sat Sep 24, 2011 6:53 pm

Rizzle wrote:http://www.epa.gov/region07/priorities/agriculture/epa_never_said_hay.htm

figured I'd look into why EPA said hay was a pollutant. Turns out they didn't.


Hey (hay)!


Don't let facts cloud somebody's paranoia!!

tom
Pray for a secular future.

MSNBC's catch phrase is "Lean Forward". Shouldn't it be "Bend Over"?

Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
machine shop tom
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 2793
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:16 pm
Location: N L Michigan

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Postby enigma57 » Sun Sep 25, 2011 5:27 am

Methinks this feedlot owner's troubles stem mainly from his failure to grease the 'right' palms and to make campaign contributions to the 'right' party.

After all...... Its the 'Chicago way' and that is how the current 'administration' in Washington operates when it picks winners and losers.

They seem to think of tax revenues and the US Treasury as a large slush fund to buy votes and to pay back political campaign contributors...... And selective enforcement of laws and regulations as a 'protection racket'.

Just my dos centavos,

Harry
BOHICA! - How's all that 'change' workin' for ya? Image
enigma57
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1571
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 10:59 pm
Location: Galt's Gulch

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Postby Engguy » Sun Sep 25, 2011 3:41 pm

machine shop tom wrote:
Rizzle wrote:http://www.epa.gov/region07/priorities/agriculture/epa_never_said_hay.htm

figured I'd look into why EPA said hay was a pollutant. Turns out they didn't.


Hey (hay)!


Don't let facts cloud somebody's paranoia!!

tom


So Radiation is paranoia? Naaa its the nasty mineral oil, they created a cute name for that is the bad thing right? Talk about paranoia.
Engguy
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1630
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 8:51 pm


Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest