I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Open to topics unrelated to Speed-Talk.
No politics. No religion topics.

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
Engguy
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:51 pm
Location:

I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Post by Engguy »

http://r-calfusa.com/news_releases/2011/110901-epa.htm

I'm just wondering where all the intelligent people are?
Isn't it funny that radiation is not bad? But everything else is?
Where in ..... are the oath takers?
Unkl Ian
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3044
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2005 9:23 pm
Location: Just outside Toronto

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Post by Unkl Ian »

The intelligent people are obviously NOT in government.

Between this one, and the Gibson guitar saga, the Lunatics really have taken over the Asylum.
Please help make Speedtalk a Troll free zone.
Engguy
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:51 pm
Location:

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Post by Engguy »

I think they are in the gov, and following exactly what there controllers want them to do. Thats why everything is a farce. People vote for something and it means nothing because if it isn't what they want it is over turned, and you get what everyone voted against, its happened a bunch here. Sports stadiums are just one item.
So why the constant demonizing of complete non issues as far as things that are bad, and the complete quiet on the one thing that is
the most destructive. ie RADIATION ? And where are the ones that take the oath????? Is that just lip service too?
Rizzle
Expert
Expert
Posts: 906
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:34 pm
Location: St. Catharines, Ont

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Post by Rizzle »

http://www.epa.gov/region07/priorities/ ... id_hay.htm

figured I'd look into why EPA said hay was a pollutant. Turns out they didn't.
machine shop tom
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2404
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:16 pm
Location: N L Michigan

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Post by machine shop tom »

Rizzle wrote:http://www.epa.gov/region07/priorities/ ... id_hay.htm

figured I'd look into why EPA said hay was a pollutant. Turns out they didn't.
Hey (hay)!


Don't let facts cloud somebody's paranoia!!

tom
Pray for a secular future.

We used to speak to tell things , now they tell things to speak.

Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
enigma57
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:59 pm
Location: Galt's Gulch

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Post by enigma57 »

Methinks this feedlot owner's troubles stem mainly from his failure to grease the 'right' palms and to make campaign contributions to the 'right' party.

After all...... Its the 'Chicago way' and that is how the current 'administration' in Washington operates when it picks winners and losers.

They seem to think of tax revenues and the US Treasury as a large slush fund to buy votes and to pay back political campaign contributors...... And selective enforcement of laws and regulations as a 'protection racket'.

Just my dos centavos,

Harry
Engguy
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1365
Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 9:51 pm
Location:

Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.

Post by Engguy »

machine shop tom wrote:
Rizzle wrote:http://www.epa.gov/region07/priorities/ ... id_hay.htm

figured I'd look into why EPA said hay was a pollutant. Turns out they didn't.
Hey (hay)!


Don't let facts cloud somebody's paranoia!!

tom
So Radiation is paranoia? Naaa its the nasty mineral oil, they created a cute name for that is the bad thing right? Talk about paranoia.
Post Reply