How important is intake valve lift w/street blown motor?

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

How important is intake valve lift w/street blown motor?

Postby DeltaT » Thu Nov 05, 2009 8:58 pm

I picked a Comp solid roller lobe that, with the 1.7 ratio on the intake rocker, will yield me a net .630" lift. Duration is gross 242@.050.

With the AFR 235cc heads, should I bother pushing the lift higher with a lobe change? I could go to a Hi-torque .406" lobe that would get me up into the net .672" lift range. With boost, does the intake side lift matter that much? I hate to leave so much of the intake flow capability these heads have on the table.

Thanks,

Jim
Half Assed = Half Fast
DeltaT
Member
Member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:14 pm
Location: NorCal

Postby Ron C. » Fri Nov 06, 2009 11:48 am

Jim, for your blown street application I would stick with the lower lift. This will help spring life which will be more important than a possible performance increase, if any.

Blessings..........Ron .
Creekside Racing Ministry
John 14:6
Ron Clevenger
CSU Gas Dominator ProCharger nonintercooled
Top Eliminator West www.topeliminatorwest.net
Steve Morris www.neweraracecraft.com
6.52@219mph (still tunning)
Ron C.
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: Visalia, Calif

Postby DeltaT » Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:57 pm

Thanks, Ron. Even with this lift, do you think I'll have to change springs every few years? And if the springs were out of the equation, is adding lift without extra duration worth anything in terms of power?

Jim
Half Assed = Half Fast
DeltaT
Member
Member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:14 pm
Location: NorCal

Postby bigjoe1 » Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:28 pm

It depends on what you consider a street setup- You are going to leave about 200 HP on the table with that little cam


JOE SHERMAN RACING ENGINES
bigjoe1
Show Guest
Show Guest
 
Posts: 3354
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:16 pm
Location: santa ana calif-92703

Postby raynorshine » Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:13 am

lets tell the whole story...won't you have to rev it up to see the potential..
raynorshine
Member
Member
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: BC, Canada

Postby PWMAX » Sat Nov 07, 2009 6:43 am

I can give you an idea. 2 557 8-71 bbc marine engines, I built, they make 1100hp a piece with about 7 lbs boost, ran them for a few seasons, solid roller cams. He was sick of valve train maintenace, so I switched them over to hyd. rollers. Old cams were fairly snorty, 265 at .050, .748 gross lift. Switched to 248 at .050 .647 lift hyd. cams. Engines were down about 100hp at high rpm, but up to about 5500 or so, the averages were better with the hyd. cams, the idle quality was better. It is propped to turn about 6000, so, that extra power up top was never even seen. Boost is king. Want more power, change pulleys. That would be the best bang for your buck by FAR. The engines above make 1500hp with a simple pully change and race gas.

Frank
PWMAX
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 318
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 7:54 pm
Location: st.paul,mn

Postby Ron C. » Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:57 am

DeltaT wrote:Thanks, Ron. Even with this lift, do you think I'll have to change springs every few years? And if the springs were out of the equation, is adding lift without extra duration worth anything in terms of power?

Jim


You've left a bunch of info about your project out of the equation. So I'm assuming .........well, I'm not sure what to assume.

More lift to a point will net a little more power, but more duration will get you there more. So it really depends on what your after in this blown street project. What do you want out of it???

Blessings..............Ron.
Creekside Racing Ministry
John 14:6
Ron Clevenger
CSU Gas Dominator ProCharger nonintercooled
Top Eliminator West www.topeliminatorwest.net
Steve Morris www.neweraracecraft.com
6.52@219mph (still tunning)
Ron C.
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 12:54 pm
Location: Visalia, Calif

Postby CamKing » Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:51 am

Supercharged engines respond to more lift, but not as much as an N/A engine does.

Going from .630" lift to .672" lift would increase the top-end power a little bit, and your springs would live 1/2 as long. Just because a head flows to .800", that doesn't mean it wants .800" lift.
If you want to take advantage of that size head, you need to increase the duration and turn it more RPM. If the engine isn't built to turn more RPM, then leave the cam alone.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs
Denver, NC
www.jonescams.com
(704)489-2449
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 3845
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC

Postby DeltaT » Mon Nov 09, 2009 2:13 pm

What do you want out of it???


Image

If you're interested, here's an engine compartment shot:

http://home.mindspring.com/~jim_fisk/si ... de_med.jpg

In rough order:

- I need to have a reasonable idle. This is a sleeper and, other than some exhaust rumble, it can't sound like it is cammed to the moon. If a cop car is sitting next to me, I don't want them perking up their ears. The 3" duals with H-pipe are fully wrapped in ceramic batting and header wrap which really tones down the exhaust note.

- I would like decent cruising mileage. I've got it up to about 20mpg with the current 3.73 gears. I am going to take a hit when I convert to E85, but will retain the ability to run pump gas or a mix.

- 7000rpm is my target redline and the motor is built to handle it and not worry if I go over a bit.

- I am all right with a valvespring change every few years. I put about 3K miles/year on the car.

This car will see mostly street, some autocross (I have a 4L80E automatic with paddle shifting), some road race. It will probably get a gear change in 2010 from 3.73 to 3.08 or 3.23. Goals are ~800rwhp, 10.xx @ >140 in the quarter, 175mph or better in the standing mile.

Thanks for the all inputs. This is a great forum; I learn stuff all the time here.

Jim
Half Assed = Half Fast
DeltaT
Member
Member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:14 pm
Location: NorCal

Postby DeltaT » Wed Nov 11, 2009 7:20 pm

Any more inputs with this new info?

Thanks,

Jim
Half Assed = Half Fast
DeltaT
Member
Member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:14 pm
Location: NorCal

Postby raynorshine » Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:13 pm

street blown :?:

what does that mean exactly.... :?: this looks more like a turbo project.. :idea:
raynorshine
Member
Member
 
Posts: 133
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:59 pm
Location: BC, Canada

Postby DeltaT » Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:02 pm

It's got a medium-sized centrifugal supercharger on it, with a large intercooler before the motor.

Jim
Half Assed = Half Fast
DeltaT
Member
Member
 
Posts: 117
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2008 2:14 pm
Location: NorCal

Postby F1Fever » Wed Nov 11, 2009 11:52 pm

I think the general consensus is to go with the lower lift, btw, with that car you'd take my money :wink:
The monday evening I raced an s10 all cammed up and 2-4's sticking out of the hood and the malodorous smell of lead fuel. When I asked him if he wanted to race he said "yea, I'll spot you a few lengths", I said no need and proceeded to get him by a couple.. all on 87 octane :twisted:
the best websites at the best prices, send me a PM or call (918) 314-0819 .. be sure to mention you're a speedtalk member!
User avatar
F1Fever
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 774
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:16 am
Location: Okla


Return to Engine Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: crumple, Sprinter99 and 12 guests