acting appointees

This is an Admin / Moderator NO GO ZONE. You're on your own.

Moderator: Team

rebelrouser
Expert
Expert
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:25 pm

acting appointees

Post by rebelrouser » Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:25 pm

40% of confirmable positions are now filled by acting appointees.

“I like acting,” Trump said, presumably because “acting” appointees are more likely to be loyal to him personally rather than to the Congress or Constitution? Why does Trump not even bother to nominate any new cabinet members?

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5713
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: acting appointees

Post by j-c-c » Wed Apr 10, 2019 4:54 pm

rebelrouser wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:25 pm
40% of confirmable positions are now filled by acting appointees.

“I like acting,” Trump said, presumably because “acting” appointees are more likely to be loyal to him personally rather than to the Congress or Constitution? Why does Trump not even bother to nominate any new cabinet members?
Hitler also liked constant chaos during his reign.

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10836
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: acting appointees

Post by 1989TransAm » Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:10 pm

j-c-c wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 4:54 pm
rebelrouser wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:25 pm
40% of confirmable positions are now filled by acting appointees.

“I like acting,” Trump said, presumably because “acting” appointees are more likely to be loyal to him personally rather than to the Congress or Constitution? Why does Trump not even bother to nominate any new cabinet members?
Hitler also liked constant chaos during his reign.
Now we are back to Hitler again. :D Funny how your brain automatically reverts back to Hitler.

exhaustgases
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5396
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:03 pm

Re: acting appointees

Post by exhaustgases » Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:26 pm

jcc has a hero.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5713
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: acting appointees

Post by j-c-c » Wed Apr 10, 2019 7:15 pm

1989TransAm wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 6:10 pm
j-c-c wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 4:54 pm
rebelrouser wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:25 pm
40% of confirmable positions are now filled by acting appointees.

“I like acting,” Trump said, presumably because “acting” appointees are more likely to be loyal to him personally rather than to the Congress or Constitution? Why does Trump not even bother to nominate any new cabinet members?
Hitler also liked constant chaos during his reign.
Now we are back to Hitler again. :D Funny how your brain automatically reverts back to Hitler.
Yea, before DT, that didn't often happen, strange, isn't it?

And facts still remain the same, funny how no ever disputes them, wonder why that is?

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7111
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: acting appointees

Post by David Redszus » Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:39 pm

And facts still remain the same, funny how no ever disputes them, wonder why that is?
Aw, bullshiit. You present no facts, only snarky, juvenile comments.

If Congress would stop stonewalling Presidential appointments, there would be no need to rely on temporary appointments.
But, the Democraps have the right to stall the process and Trump has the legal right to thwart their efforts. Fair enough.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5713
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: acting appointees

Post by j-c-c » Mon Apr 15, 2019 8:54 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:39 pm
And facts still remain the same, funny how no ever disputes them, wonder why that is?
Aw, bullshiit. You present no facts, only snarky, juvenile comments.

If Congress would stop stonewalling Presidential appointments, there would be no need to rely on temporary appointments.
But, the Democraps have the right to stall the process and Trump has the legal right to thwart their efforts. Fair enough.

"And facts still remain the same, funny how no ever disputes them, wonder why that is?"

"Aw, bullshiit. You present no facts, only snarky, juvenile comments."


Something doesn't compute then above, and funny how few seem to be up to make a case against a proclaimed "juvenile".

Accusations of "snark" usually means somebody has found another's soft underbelly of their position and resort to ad hominem.

ad ho·mi·nem
adjective
1.(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10836
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: acting appointees

Post by 1989TransAm » Mon Apr 15, 2019 9:27 pm

Exhibit A. ^^^^^^^^^^^^

rebelrouser
Expert
Expert
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: acting appointees

Post by rebelrouser » Mon Apr 15, 2019 9:44 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 1:39 pm
And facts still remain the same, funny how no ever disputes them, wonder why that is?
Aw, bullshiit. You present no facts, only snarky, juvenile comments.

If Congress would stop stonewalling Presidential appointments, there would be no need to rely on temporary appointments.
But, the Democraps have the right to stall the process and Trump has the legal right to thwart their efforts. Fair enough.
Trump has to appoint someone for the job before anybody can stonewall it. Several hundred jobs He has never bother to appoint anybody for over a year ago. He has not appointed anybody to fill the cabinet positions for those who he fired or quit except the attorney general, and we all no why that was important for him right?

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics ... ity-vacant

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10836
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: acting appointees

Post by 1989TransAm » Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:20 pm

That story is almost two years old. Just unbelievable the crap that you post. #-o

gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4069
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: acting appointees

Post by gmrocket » Mon Apr 15, 2019 11:53 pm

1989TransAm wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:20 pm
That story is almost two years old. Just unbelievable the crap that you post. #-o
I swear all these left wing kooks, rebeldoucher, firedum7.5, justa Cuck Cuck, 86 begal, and the rest of the losers,, are all on trumps payroll!!

Makes total sense,, can't get anymore trump supportive that those fvck sticks proving how crazy the left is

rebelrouser
Expert
Expert
Posts: 609
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2015 2:25 pm

Re: acting appointees

Post by rebelrouser » Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:47 am

1989TransAm wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:20 pm
That story is almost two years old. Just unbelievable the crap that you post. #-o
That is the whole point, after two years rump has still not filled those jobs with people. Nobody said I was mistaken in my post, you just whine that I posted it.

But you right winger can defend Trumps lack of morals, lack of job performance, his disregard for the rule of law, his diminishing mental state, how can you people not see what is right in front of your face. The man is a train wreck.

fdicrasto
Expert
Expert
Posts: 737
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: acting appointees

Post by fdicrasto » Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:10 am

Always good for a laugh. The left describing themselves and then putting Trump's name in front of it. It just keeps getting better.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5713
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: acting appointees

Post by j-c-c » Tue Apr 16, 2019 10:12 am

gmrocket wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 11:53 pm
1989TransAm wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:20 pm
That story is almost two years old. Just unbelievable the crap that you post. #-o
I swear all these left wing kooks, rebeldoucher, firedum7.5, justa Cuck Cuck, 86 begal, and the rest of the losers,, are all on trumps payroll!!

Makes total sense,, can't get anymore trump supportive that those fvck sticks proving how crazy the left is

Still praying for "incurable cancer" for others, because you sure aren't extending any olive branches? [-X

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10836
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: acting appointees

Post by 1989TransAm » Tue Apr 16, 2019 2:25 pm

rebelrouser wrote:
Tue Apr 16, 2019 8:47 am
1989TransAm wrote:
Mon Apr 15, 2019 10:20 pm
That story is almost two years old. Just unbelievable the crap that you post. #-o
That is the whole point, after two years rump has still not filled those jobs with people. Nobody said I was mistaken in my post, you just whine that I posted it.

But you right winger can defend Trumps lack of morals, lack of job performance, his disregard for the rule of law, his diminishing mental state, how can you people not see what is right in front of your face. The man is a train wreck.
So you think all government positions should be filled? Apparently you do not think that the government is too big and bloated and that no cuts should be made.

Post Reply