I think I'm in love

This is an Admin / Moderator NO GO ZONE. You're on your own.

Moderator: Team

gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3078
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by gmrocket » Thu Mar 07, 2019 1:02 pm

GRTfast wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 10:33 am
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:21 am
GRTfast wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:10 am


"riot" is not defined in her legislation, which is purposefully done such that any protesters and people funding the protesters are subject to repercussions for simply exercising their rights. I know that is difficult to understand when you are a fascist who isn't aware that they are a fascist.
Nope, she doesn't need to define it. Law enforcement categorize what a riot is. Or you can look up riot in the dictionary, it's not a new word she made up

Oh boy, I'm a fascist?? That's new, never heard a lefty call anyone a fascist before...IM SHOCKED!!
Keep supporting the suppression of constitutional rights and not calling yourself a fascist whilst supporting the most authoritarian/fascist presidential administration we've ever had. I'll keep laughing and shaking my head.
where does it say you a constitutional right to riot?

Trump, the only president who has the balls to protect free speech on college and university campuses....he is the worst fascist in history.

in reality...you and the left are true fascists...these days you terrorize those who dont agree with your thoughts, violence or whatever it takes to shut down wrong think. in the old days you would just put a bullet between their eyes to shut them down

now you call in bomb threats, sucker punch them, start fires, make death threats etc

the left is fascism, and fascism is the left.....today and historically

GRTfast
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1576
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:26 am

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by GRTfast » Thu Mar 07, 2019 1:57 pm

gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 1:02 pm
GRTfast wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 10:33 am
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 9:21 am


Nope, she doesn't need to define it. Law enforcement categorize what a riot is. Or you can look up riot in the dictionary, it's not a new word she made up

Oh boy, I'm a fascist?? That's new, never heard a lefty call anyone a fascist before...IM SHOCKED!!
Keep supporting the suppression of constitutional rights and not calling yourself a fascist whilst supporting the most authoritarian/fascist presidential administration we've ever had. I'll keep laughing and shaking my head.
where does it say you a constitutional right to riot?

Trump, the only president who has the balls to protect free speech on college and university campuses....he is the worst fascist in history.

in reality...you and the left are true fascists...these days you terrorize those who dont agree with your thoughts, violence or whatever it takes to shut down wrong think. in the old days you would just put a bullet between their eyes to shut them down

now you call in bomb threats, sucker punch them, start fires, make death threats etc

the left is fascism, and fascism is the left.....today and historically
Keep telling yourself that.

BTW, when did I say I supported the left? I find it very telling that you pigeon hole anyone who disagrees with you as a leftist. I am pretty much dead center between liberal and conservative, and way towards libertarian on the libertarian/authoritarian axis. Essentially a reasonable person who champions individual freedom to the extent that it isn't harming others. You guys are too funny with your absolutists either/or binary worldviews.

gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3078
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by gmrocket » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm

You agree with the issues the left does..so, and you hate trump. Is there anything he's done you agree with?

And you disagree with what this post is about, holding those accountable who break the law and those who fund them .

And your view on fascism is backwards

GRTfast
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1576
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:26 am

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by GRTfast » Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:38 pm

gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm
You agree with the issues the left does..so, and you hate trump. Is there anything he's done you agree with?
I like how he is being tough on China regarding trade and intellectual property theft. I may not fully agree with his tactics, but the problems need to be addressed and he's addressing them.

Middle class wages have increased a bit, that is good too. I think the tax his tax plan will ultimately fail the middle class as the changes expire, but for the time being it's a good thing.
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm
And you disagree with what this post is about, holding those accountable who break the law and those who fund them.
Nope, you're missing the point, and you're putting words in my mouth. That's dishonest at best. I am all for holding people accountable for breaking the law. This bill goes over the line and gives the government power to go after people who fund PEACEFUL legal protests, and the people peacefully protesting. Let's look at a potential scenario. Person X funds a group to peacefully protest something. During the protest, the police overstep their bounds and start pepper spraying and beating protesters. The protesters fight back, as their constitutional rights are being violated. The police label the event a riot, and now person X is held liable for funding a riot. That is total gestapo bullsh!t.
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm
And your view on fascism is backwards
Nope again.

Definition of fascism
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control

--------------------------
"It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep" -Originally said by Benito Mussolini. Retweeted by Trump a year or two ago.
---------------------------
https://www.theatlantic.com/internation ... rs/554810/

gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3078
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by gmrocket » Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:47 pm

it covers RIOT boosting, nothing more..you thinking they will start going after peaceful protesters is just being paranoid. if that happens then whoever does it will also face the courts.

your thinking we live in a third world country

GRTfast
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1576
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:26 am

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by GRTfast » Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:31 pm

gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:47 pm
it covers RIOT boosting, nothing more..you thinking they will start going after peaceful protesters is just being paranoid. if that happens then whoever does it will also face the courts.

your thinking we live in a third world country
What if the police start the riot? It’s still a riot isn’t it? We have plenty of examples of police insighting violence when protesters aren’t breaking laws. With this new legislation, police can attack protestors, start a riot, then charge the people who funded the protestors, and go after their assetts. This isn’t a giant leap. This already happens.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/static.the ... eline.html

Watch that video. Tell me that you honestly see people rioting. The ONLY people being violent are the police, yet a bunch of protestors were charged with rioting.

This is how rights are erroded, and you apparently love it. Just like a good authoritarian should.

gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3078
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by gmrocket » Fri Mar 08, 2019 12:23 am

GRTfast wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:38 pm
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm
You agree with the issues the left does..so, and you hate trump. Is there anything he's done you agree with?
I like how he is being tough on China regarding trade and intellectual property theft. I may not fully agree with his tactics, but the problems need to be addressed and he's addressing them.

Middle class wages have increased a bit, that is good too. I think the tax his tax plan will ultimately fail the middle class as the changes expire, but for the time being it's a good thing.
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm
And you disagree with what this post is about, holding those accountable who break the law and those who fund them.
Nope, you're missing the point, and you're putting words in my mouth. That's dishonest at best. I am all for holding people accountable for breaking the law. This bill goes over the line and gives the government power to go after people who fund PEACEFUL legal protests, and the people peacefully protesting. Let's look at a potential scenario. Person X funds a group to peacefully protest something. During the protest, the police overstep their bounds and start pepper spraying and beating protesters. The protesters fight back, as their constitutional rights are being violated. The police label the event a riot, and now person X is held liable for funding a riot. That is total gestapo bullsh!t.
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:18 pm
And your view on fascism is backwards
Nope again.

Definition of fascism
1 often capitalized : a political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition
2 : a tendency toward or actual exercise of strong autocratic or dictatorial control

--------------------------
"It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep" -Originally said by Benito Mussolini. Retweeted by Trump a year or two ago.
---------------------------
https://www.theatlantic.com/internation ... rs/554810/
the three muskateers of fascism and socialism...democrats, hitler and mussolini ...all of which had the same views and policies, which continue till today as the dems proudly call themselves socialist

https://www.heartland.org/news-opinion/ ... ng-fascism

or this..watch from 25:45 to about 48:30,a history lesson for you

https://www.thedailycoin.org/2019/03/05 ... uza-video/

gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3078
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by gmrocket » Fri Mar 08, 2019 12:43 am

GRTfast wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:31 pm
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:47 pm
it covers RIOT boosting, nothing more..you thinking they will start going after peaceful protesters is just being paranoid. if that happens then whoever does it will also face the courts.

your thinking we live in a third world country
What if the police start the riot? It’s still a riot isn’t it? We have plenty of examples of police insighting violence when protesters aren’t breaking laws. With this new legislation, police can attack protestors, start a riot, then charge the people who funded the protestors, and go after their assetts. This isn’t a giant leap. This already happens.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/static.the ... eline.html

Watch that video. Tell me that you honestly see people rioting. The ONLY people being violent are the police, yet a bunch of protestors were charged with rioting.

This is how rights are erroded, and you apparently love it. Just like a good authoritarian should.
ive seen the whole stupid dapl protest shinnanigans. i know more about that pipeline than you and your one sided news story because our company owns 30% of it. that scene, the protesters did not stay off the construction site, they crossed over which broke the law...they were not viciously attacked, a few were handcuffed and arrested. then let go, which shouldnt have happened.

GRTfast
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1576
Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2017 8:26 am

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by GRTfast » Fri Mar 08, 2019 7:38 am

gmrocket wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 12:43 am
GRTfast wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:31 pm
gmrocket wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 5:47 pm
it covers RIOT boosting, nothing more..you thinking they will start going after peaceful protesters is just being paranoid. if that happens then whoever does it will also face the courts.

your thinking we live in a third world country
What if the police start the riot? It’s still a riot isn’t it? We have plenty of examples of police insighting violence when protesters aren’t breaking laws. With this new legislation, police can attack protestors, start a riot, then charge the people who funded the protestors, and go after their assetts. This isn’t a giant leap. This already happens.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/static.the ... eline.html

Watch that video. Tell me that you honestly see people rioting. The ONLY people being violent are the police, yet a bunch of protestors were charged with rioting.

This is how rights are erroded, and you apparently love it. Just like a good authoritarian should.
ive seen the whole stupid dapl protest shinnanigans. i know more about that pipeline than you and your one sided news story because our company owns 30% of it. that scene, the protesters did not stay off the construction site, they crossed over which broke the law...they were not viciously attacked, a few were handcuffed and arrested. then let go, which shouldnt have happened.
They were charged with rioting. Did you see any protesters rioting? That is my exact point. You enact legislation that allows people to have their assets seized based on rioting, then you label an event a riot when it clearly isn't. It's a slippery slope, and the bottom of that slope is corporate/government tyranny.

gmrocket
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3078
Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 6:40 pm
Location: Grimsby Ontario

Re: I think I'm in love

Post by gmrocket » Fri Mar 08, 2019 9:45 am

GRTfast wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 7:38 am
gmrocket wrote:
Fri Mar 08, 2019 12:43 am
GRTfast wrote:
Thu Mar 07, 2019 7:31 pm


What if the police start the riot? It’s still a riot isn’t it? We have plenty of examples of police insighting violence when protesters aren’t breaking laws. With this new legislation, police can attack protestors, start a riot, then charge the people who funded the protestors, and go after their assetts. This isn’t a giant leap. This already happens.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/static.the ... eline.html

Watch that video. Tell me that you honestly see people rioting. The ONLY people being violent are the police, yet a bunch of protestors were charged with rioting.

This is how rights are erroded, and you apparently love it. Just like a good authoritarian should.
ive seen the whole stupid dapl protest shinnanigans. i know more about that pipeline than you and your one sided news story because our company owns 30% of it. that scene, the protesters did not stay off the construction site, they crossed over which broke the law...they were not viciously attacked, a few were handcuffed and arrested. then let go, which shouldnt have happened.
They were charged with rioting. Did you see any protesters rioting? That is my exact point. You enact legislation that allows people to have their assets seized based on rioting, then you label an event a riot when it clearly isn't. It's a slippery slope, and the bottom of that slope is corporate/government tyranny.
They refused to back off the construction property and then physically assaulted the police while continually advancing,,then had to be dragged off the property

that was the lamest vid of the whole dapl protest,, why not shiw the ones of them starting fires, destroying machinery,throwing shyt at cops , bringing dogs in, punching the cops on and on

Your pretending there is some moral grey area between peaceful protest and riot

There isn't

Post Reply