Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

This is an Admin / Moderator NO GO ZONE. You're on your own.

Moderator: Team

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by 1989TransAm » Mon Jul 09, 2018 11:21 pm

Good news. We do not need a judicial activist on the Supreme Court. We do not want someone who legislates from the bench. We want some one who is a Constitutionalist. President Trump keeping his campaign promises. :D :mrgreen: =D>

"President Donald Trump has picked Brett M. Kavanaugh, a federal appeals court judge with extensive legal credentials and a lengthy political record, to succeed Justice Anthony M. Kennedy on the Supreme Court.
Kavanaugh, 53, is an ideological conservative who is expected to push the court to the right on a number of issues including business regulation and national security.
But he is also considered a safer pick than some of the more partisan choices on the president’s shortlist."

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/07/05/trump-p ... court.html

exhaustgases
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4062
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:03 pm

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by exhaustgases » Tue Jul 10, 2018 2:23 am

The demon c rats hate him they are afraid he could ruin their unborn baby killings.

enigma57
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1344
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 11:59 pm
Location: Galt's Gulch

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by enigma57 » Tue Jul 10, 2018 5:36 am

Regarding President Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court......

The selective outrage of the left is scripted. They had their rebuttals and talking points and incitements to violence ready long before President Trump even chose his nominee for the Supreme Court. Their response would have been much the same no matter who he nominated. That's the way it is with the left.

Predictably, they are now wringing their hands (scare tactics to energize their base) at the very thought their ability to fund the wholesale murder of thousands upon thousands of unborn children each year with your and my tax dollars might be in jeopardy. When in actuality were Roe VS Wade at some point overturned, matters regarding abortion would simply be turned back to each state to decide, as it was in years priour.

And that the Socialist framework of Obamacare might unravel. As if the Supreme Court issues decisions at its discretion rather than acting only on legal matters brought before it by litigants having legal standing in those matters. So disingenuous.

I was reflecting this evening on what a total disaster it would be had Hillary Clinton been elected and what our nation would be facing in the decades ahead had she been nominating Supreme Court Justices.

We all have much to be grateful for,

Harry

mk e
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Elverson, PA

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by mk e » Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:00 am

Shocking that he pick a judge who's written options that a sitting president can not be charged with a crime ;)
Mark
Mechanical Engineer

engineczar
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1391
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 10:47 am
Location: Dubois, Wy.

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by engineczar » Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:56 am

mk e wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:00 am
Shocking that he pick a judge who's written options that a sitting president can not be charged with a crime ;)
Shocking that your entire response is right in line with the DNC. :wink:

engineczar
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1391
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2004 10:47 am
Location: Dubois, Wy.

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by engineczar » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:01 am

enigma57 wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 5:36 am
Regarding President Trump's nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court......

The selective outrage of the left is scripted. They had their rebuttals and talking points and incitements to violence ready long before President Trump even chose his nominee for the Supreme Court. Their response would have been much the same no matter who he nominated. That's the way it is with the left.

Predictably, they are now wringing their hands (scare tactics to energize their base) at the very thought their ability to fund the wholesale murder of thousands upon thousands of unborn children each year with your and my tax dollars might be in jeopardy. When in actuality were Roe VS Wade at some point overturned, matters regarding abortion would simply be turned back to each state to decide, as it was in years priour.

And that the Socialist framework of Obamacare might unravel. As if the Supreme Court issues decisions at its discretion rather than acting only on legal matters brought before it by litigants having legal standing in those matters. So disingenuous.

I was reflecting this evening on what a total disaster it would be had Hillary Clinton been elected and what our nation would be facing in the decades ahead had she been nominating Supreme Court Justices.

We all have much to be grateful for,

Harry
I found this one somewhat funny. Someone forgot to add the name before they released the statement.
20180710_075856.jpg

RevTheory
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:45 am

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by RevTheory » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:38 am

mk e wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:00 am
Shocking that he pick a judge who's written options that a sitting president can not be charged with a crime ;)
Out of 300 opinions, that's the one you chose to focus on? Did he even write it or did some left-wing, Trump-hating, hack site say that he wrote it. You keep hoping that Donald Trump is found guilty of a crime but you were wrong a year and a half ago and you're still wrong.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4010
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by j-c-c » Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:50 am

RevTheory wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:38 am
mk e wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:00 am
Shocking that he pick a judge who's written options that a sitting president can not be charged with a crime ;)
Out of 300 opinions, that's the one you chose to focus on? Did he even write it or did some left-wing, Trump-hating, hack site say that he wrote it. You keep hoping that Donald Trump is found guilty of a crime but you were wrong a year and a half ago and you're still wrong.
So you are suggesting DT would have nominated anyone that had the opposite legal opinion?

I think not.

Its a "get out of jail" nomination, DT has ALWAYS made his choices of what suits his interests first and foremost, his adeptness is in hiding it enough to distract his rabid single issue followers.

mk e
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Elverson, PA

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by mk e » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:06 am

RevTheory wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:38 am

Out of 300 opinions, that's the one you chose to focus on?
It's the only one that concerns me and it wasn't a case before him, it was an article he wrote.

Its discussed here with a link to the original article:
https://www.google.com/amp/www.newsweek ... 21%3famp=1
Mark
Mechanical Engineer

RevTheory
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:45 am

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by RevTheory » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:23 am

j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:50 am
RevTheory wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:38 am
mk e wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 7:00 am
Shocking that he pick a judge who's written options that a sitting president can not be charged with a crime ;)
Out of 300 opinions, that's the one you chose to focus on? Did he even write it or did some left-wing, Trump-hating, hack site say that he wrote it. You keep hoping that Donald Trump is found guilty of a crime but you were wrong a year and a half ago and you're still wrong.
So you are suggesting DT would have nominated anyone that had the opposite legal opinion?

I think not.

Its a "get out of jail" nomination, DT has ALWAYS made his choices of what suits his interests first and foremost, his adeptness is in hiding it enough to distract his rabid single issue followers.
So Donald Trump picked a judge that would get him off the hook (like there aren't eight others :roll: ) for a crime you swear happened but no evidence exists knowing full-well what a battle the confirmation would be. Yeah, ok.

And you wonder why people have been saying for months now that you have zero credibility.

mk e
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Elverson, PA

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by mk e » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:39 am

j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:50 am

...DT has ALWAYS made his choices of what suits his interests first and foremost, ...
That is certainly true. I have no doubt that 1 article is the sole reason he was picked. He wasn't on the original list but was suggested by WH councel.....hmmmmmmm
Mark
Mechanical Engineer

User avatar
Ken0069
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4497
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:25 am
Location: Historic Appomattox County, Va
Contact:

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by Ken0069 » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:42 am

Image
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)


Big Boyz Toyz!

Global Warming Is a FRAUD!

RevTheory
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4982
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:45 am

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by RevTheory » Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:54 am

mk e wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:39 am
j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:50 am

...DT has ALWAYS made his choices of what suits his interests first and foremost, ...
That is certainly true. I have no doubt that 1 article is the sole reason he was picked. He wasn't on the original list but was suggested by WH councel.....hmmmmmmm
Ummm, you're wrong again. Even if Kavanaugh was added to his existing list, it was done eight months ago; long before Kennedy announced his retirement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Tr ... candidates

You keep looking for crimes to pin on Trump but they simply don't exist.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4010
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by j-c-c » Tue Jul 10, 2018 10:03 am

RevTheory wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:23 am
j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:50 am
RevTheory wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:38 am


Out of 300 opinions, that's the one you chose to focus on? Did he even write it or did some left-wing, Trump-hating, hack site say that he wrote it. You keep hoping that Donald Trump is found guilty of a crime but you were wrong a year and a half ago and you're still wrong.
So you are suggesting DT would have nominated anyone that had the opposite legal opinion?

I think not.

Its a "get out of jail" nomination, DT has ALWAYS made his choices of what suits his interests first and foremost, his adeptness is in hiding it enough to distract his rabid single issue followers.
So Donald Trump picked a judge that would get him off the hook (like there aren't eight others :roll: ) for a crime you swear happened but no evidence exists knowing full-well what a battle the confirmation would be. Yeah, ok.

And you wonder why people have been saying for months now that you have zero credibility.
1. We have yet to hear why so many supporters are so defensive of a guy with "no evidence"?
2. There is no substantial written known evidence the other 8 would r4le the same for a POTUS above the law thinking
3. Nobody is swearing, yet.
4. It is best one presents evidence of their credibility before questioning others credibility.
5. Get your watch fixed or a netter calendar before trying to attach a time reference to your false unsupported claims, if facts matter to you. [-X .

mk e
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5138
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:19 pm
Location: Elverson, PA

Re: Trump nominates Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court

Post by mk e » Tue Jul 10, 2018 10:07 am

RevTheory wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:54 am
mk e wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 9:39 am
j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jul 10, 2018 8:50 am

...DT has ALWAYS made his choices of what suits his interests first and foremost, ...
That is certainly true. I have no doubt that 1 article is the sole reason he was picked. He wasn't on the original list but was suggested by WH councel.....hmmmmmmm
Ummm, you're wrong again. Even if Kavanaugh was added to his existing list, it was done eight months ago; long before Kennedy announced his retirement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Tr ... candidates
Your link say he was added:
Names marked with a triple asterisk (***) were added to the revised short list of November 17, 2017.

Well after it became clear there was an open legal question about charging a sitting president. That doesn't mean Kavanaugh is a bad candidate, but give his writing on the question of charging a president the choice makes it look as though Rump is tried to stack the deck.
Mark
Mechanical Engineer

Post Reply