Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

This is an Admin / Moderator NO GO ZONE. You're on your own.

Moderator: Team

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6465
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by David Redszus » Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:01 pm

We're getting off topic.

Mulvaney is taking the first steps toward a total and complete dismantling of the CFPB; one of the
worst pieces of legislation (besides Obamacare) to ever come out of the DC swamp.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2648
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by j-c-c » Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:00 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:01 pm
We're getting off topic.

Mulvaney is taking the first steps toward a total and complete dismantling of the CFPB; one of the
worst pieces of legislation (besides Obamacare) to ever come out of the DC swamp.
So back up your above claim, as my blind faith filter is clogged today.
If you are trying to be informative for this group, include fairly, both pluses and minuses of the legislation, if you want to just promote your narrative (propaganda), ignore anything that does not support your claim, we will notice your real intent I suspect rather quickly.

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by 1989TransAm » Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:09 pm

j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:59 am
RevTheory wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 9:31 am
Isn't it odd how the left who supposedly champions women, utterly destroyed Sarah and even went after her special-needs child claiming that he was actually Bristol's born out of wedlock and Sarah was just covering for her.

Despicable!
You are really digging deep with a very broad brush there cowboy, sounds really desperate to me.
Not really. The left will always go after those who they disagree with. This includes Blacks and women.

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6465
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by David Redszus » Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:57 pm

j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:00 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:01 pm
We're getting off topic.

Mulvaney is taking the first steps toward a total and complete dismantling of the CFPB; one of the
worst pieces of legislation (besides Obamacare) to ever come out of the DC swamp.
So back up your above claim, as my blind faith filter is clogged today.
If you are trying to be informative for this group, include fairly, both pluses and minuses of the legislation, if you want to just promote your narrative (propaganda), ignore anything that does not support your claim, we will notice your real intent I suspect rather quickly.
Your observation is logical if you choose not to take a position on something you might not understand. I did not present pluses and minuses because there are no pluses. Which aspects of the legislation do you think were positive?

You are setting a precendent in which no position can be expressed without detailed support. That will hurt your propaganda agenda more than anyone else's.

Do you know anything at all about propaganda? It appears not.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2648
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by j-c-c » Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:41 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:57 pm
j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:00 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 1:01 pm
We're getting off topic.

Mulvaney is taking the first steps toward a total and complete dismantling of the CFPB; one of the
worst pieces of legislation (besides Obamacare) to ever come out of the DC swamp.
So back up your above claim, as my blind faith filter is clogged today.
If you are trying to be informative for this group, include fairly, both pluses and minuses of the legislation, if you want to just promote your narrative (propaganda), ignore anything that does not support your claim, we will notice your real intent I suspect rather quickly.
Your observation is logical if you choose not to take a position on something you might not understand. I did not present pluses and minuses because there are no pluses. Which aspects of the legislation do you think were positive?

You are setting a precendent in which no position can be expressed without detailed support. That will hurt your propaganda agenda more than anyone else's.

Do you know anything at all about propaganda? It appears not.
Yes, anyone who states in a discussion there are no "pluses" is a purveyor of "proganadana", or stupid, or very ignorant, or as recently stated, maybe some combination of all three.

Hard to dispute this definition:

prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/Submit
noun
1.
derogatory
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
"he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda"

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6465
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by David Redszus » Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:46 am

j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:41 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:57 pm
j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:00 pm


So back up your above claim, as my blind faith filter is clogged today.
If you are trying to be informative for this group, include fairly, both pluses and minuses of the legislation, if you want to just promote your narrative (propaganda), ignore anything that does not support your claim, we will notice your real intent I suspect rather quickly.
Your observation is logical if you choose not to take a position on something you might not understand. I did not present pluses and minuses because there are no pluses. Which aspects of the legislation do you think were positive?

You are setting a precendent in which no position can be expressed without detailed support. That will hurt your propaganda agenda more than anyone else's.

Do you know anything at all about propaganda? It appears not.
Yes, anyone who states in a discussion there are no "pluses" is a purveyor of "proganadana", or stupid, or very ignorant, or as recently stated, maybe some combination of all three.

Hard to dispute this definition:

prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/Submit
noun
1.
derogatory
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
"he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda"
You actually get your knowledge of propaganda from a dictionary? That is the extent of your experience?
How much more childish can you get?
Stay tuned everyone; we are sure to see much more to come.

RevTheory
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4358
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:45 am

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by RevTheory » Wed Jun 13, 2018 9:07 am

He just described 90% of the media; tv and print =D>

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2648
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by j-c-c » Wed Jun 13, 2018 6:40 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Wed Jun 13, 2018 1:46 am
j-c-c wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 8:41 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Tue Jun 12, 2018 4:57 pm

Your observation is logical if you choose not to take a position on something you might not understand. I did not present pluses and minuses because there are no pluses. Which aspects of the legislation do you think were positive?

You are setting a precendent in which no position can be expressed without detailed support. That will hurt your propaganda agenda more than anyone else's.

Do you know anything at all about propaganda? It appears not.
Yes, anyone who states in a discussion there are no "pluses" is a purveyor of "proganadana", or stupid, or very ignorant, or as recently stated, maybe some combination of all three.

Hard to dispute this definition:

prop·a·gan·da
ˌpräpəˈɡandə/Submit
noun
1.
derogatory
information, especially of a biased or misleading nature, used to promote or publicize a particular political cause or point of view.
"he was charged with distributing enemy propaganda"
You actually get your knowledge of propaganda from a dictionary? That is the extent of your experience?
How much more childish can you get?
Stay tuned everyone; we are sure to see much more to come.
Sorry, I was taking in to consideration the intended audience.
And also sorry you can't even dispute a simple dictionary definition, it would frustrate me also. :lol:

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by 1989TransAm » Wed Jun 13, 2018 7:27 pm

Such superior intellect. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ :D

Such as the definition of a "spy". :D

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6465
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by David Redszus » Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:53 am

Sorry, I was taking in to consideration the intended audience.
And also sorry you can't even dispute a simple dictionary definition, it would frustrate me also. :lol:
You stupid little child. I spent eight years as an Army infantry propaganda officer. I have taught propaganda to hundreds
of operatives and forgotten more about real propaganda than you will ever know.

First rule of the propagandist; know your target audience.
You know nothing except rectal pronouncements. :lol:

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by 1989TransAm » Thu Jun 14, 2018 2:40 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:53 am
Sorry, I was taking in to consideration the intended audience.
And also sorry you can't even dispute a simple dictionary definition, it would frustrate me also. :lol:
You stupid little child. I spent eight years as an Army infantry propaganda officer. I have taught propaganda to hundreds
of operatives and forgotten more about real propaganda than you will ever know.

First rule of the propagandist; know your target audience.
You know nothing except rectal pronouncements. :lol:
Bwahahahahaha. :D =D>

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2648
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by j-c-c » Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:50 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:53 am
Sorry, I was taking in to consideration the intended audience.
And also sorry you can't even dispute a simple dictionary definition, it would frustrate me also. :lol:
You stupid little child. I spent eight years as an Army infantry propaganda officer. I have taught propaganda to hundreds
of operatives and forgotten more about real propaganda than you will ever know.

First rule of the propagandist; know your target audience.
You know nothing except rectal pronouncements. :lol:
Well that's a big piece of the puzzle.
Sorry to hear about your disability, seems rather chronic..

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by 1989TransAm » Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:32 pm

j-c-c wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:50 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:53 am
Sorry, I was taking in to consideration the intended audience.
And also sorry you can't even dispute a simple dictionary definition, it would frustrate me also. :lol:
You stupid little child. I spent eight years as an Army infantry propaganda officer. I have taught propaganda to hundreds
of operatives and forgotten more about real propaganda than you will ever know.

First rule of the propagandist; know your target audience.
You know nothing except rectal pronouncements. :lol:
Well that's a big piece of the puzzle.
Sorry to hear about your disability, seems rather chronic..
I take it you dislike the military?

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2648
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by j-c-c » Thu Jun 14, 2018 9:32 pm

1989TransAm wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:32 pm
j-c-c wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:50 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Thu Jun 14, 2018 12:53 am

You stupid little child. I spent eight years as an Army infantry propaganda officer. I have taught propaganda to hundreds
of operatives and forgotten more about real propaganda than you will ever know.

First rule of the propagandist; know your target audience.
You know nothing except rectal pronouncements. :lol:
Well that's a big piece of the puzzle.
Sorry to hear about your disability, seems rather chronic..
I take it you dislike the military?
Then you take it wrong.
Don't confuse the reputation you have earned we me, and others here by your comments, as to how I feel about millions of other honorable servicemen, past and present.

1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 8319
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Re: Mick Mulvaney Fires Entire CFPB Advisory Board

Post by 1989TransAm » Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:30 pm

Sounded to me like you were denigrating David's military service.

Post Reply