Zuckerberg Can't Define 'Hate Speech'?

Any topic with a chance of polarization - Not for the easily offended.

Moderator: Team

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6005
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Zuckerberg Can't Define 'Hate Speech'?

Post by David Redszus » Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:31 am

j-c-c wrote:
Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:58 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Thu Apr 12, 2018 3:27 pm
j-c-c wrote:
Thu Apr 12, 2018 2:56 pm


Isn't the main stumbling block the inclusion of the single word "Offends"?

Otherwise I find it hard to object to, except maybe better define 'words without social value", if possible.

I reserve the right to defend anyone's right to feel something I said is offensive, and no more. :mrgreen:
As near as I can tell, there are no Constitutional protections against being "offended".

It is my right to offend you.
Get used to it.
You didn't read my comment very carefully, did you?
And good Luck, its also my right to decide what offends me, that being said, ever seen me offended yet? :lol:
The strange reality, guess who ends up looking the most foolish?
I never read your comments very carefully. :)
They are very often "words without social value". But entertaining nonetheless.

I too am never offended; irritated by ignorance and stupidity, perhaps: but never offended.

What does an offended man look like?

j-c-c
Expert
Expert
Posts: 703
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Zuckerberg Can't Define 'Hate Speech'?

Post by j-c-c » Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:27 am

David Redszus wrote:
Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:31 am
j-c-c wrote:
Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:58 pm
David Redszus wrote:
Thu Apr 12, 2018 3:27 pm

As near as I can tell, there are no Constitutional protections against being "offended".

It is my right to offend you.
Get used to it.
You didn't read my comment very carefully, did you?
And good Luck, its also my right to decide what offends me, that being said, ever seen me offended yet? :lol:
The strange reality, guess who ends up looking the most foolish?
I never read your comments very carefully. :)
They are very often "words without social value". But entertaining nonetheless.


I too am never offended; irritated by ignorance and stupidity, perhaps: but never offended.

What does an offended man look like?
You realize how illogical that ehanced comment appears face value, right?

We have little in in common on this issue I suspect, in that you will not find anywhere where I said I am "never offended".

Making your statement of "Never" implies to me a certain level of arrogance and/ or hubris.

You really should be more "careful" in your reading.

Don't know, or really care what what an offended man looks like.

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6005
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Zuckerberg Can't Define 'Hate Speech'?

Post by David Redszus » Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:14 pm

We have little in in common on this issue I suspect, in that you will not find anywhere where I said I am "never offended".
Very well, I accept that. I can't speak for you, but I am never offended. I simply consider the source.
Making your statement of "Never" implies to me a certain level of arrogance and/ or hubris.
Yes it does and that is a very good thing. There is a thin line between arrogance and supreme confidence; which we often cross over. So what?
You really should be more "careful" in your reading.
Why? What purpose would that serve when so many indicate an inability to read at all.
Don't know, or really care what what an offended man looks like.
Then how do you know such a thing actually exists?
Perhaps an "offended man", like some words, have no social value.

j-c-c
Expert
Expert
Posts: 703
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Zuckerberg Can't Define 'Hate Speech'?

Post by j-c-c » Fri Apr 13, 2018 6:27 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Fri Apr 13, 2018 12:14 pm
Don't know, or really care what what an offended man looks like.
Then how do you know such a thing actually exists?
Perhaps an "offended man", like some words, have no social value.
Your reading has improved i see.
Reg last question, asked and answered for all intents, and your final remark, that is a separate topic, best start your own thread,

I'm taking a knee.

exhaustgases
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1842
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:03 pm

Re: Zuckerberg Can't Define 'Hate Speech'?

Post by exhaustgases » Sat Apr 14, 2018 5:01 pm

suckerbird, is hate speech, seems doesn't like Diamond and Silk.

pdq67
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7207
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: Zuckerberg Can't Define 'Hate Speech'?

Post by pdq67 » Mon Apr 16, 2018 12:30 am

He doesn't want to be held accountable for writing a, "DEFINITION", so this is the shit he pulls!

Somebody might call him, "a mealy-mouthed CSer!!"...

pdq67

Post Reply