Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Any topic with a chance of polarization - Not for the easily offended.

Moderator: Team

exhaustgases
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:03 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by exhaustgases » Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:38 pm

woody b wrote:
Fri Mar 02, 2018 10:23 am
The liberals have been literally screaming "ban high capacity magazines" "ban high capacity magazines. Guess what. The parkland nut job didn't have any high capacity magazines. They wouldn't fit in his bag. He had fifteen 10 round magazines.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2018/03/ ... gazines/
Neither would the armor that the teacher saw the shooter wearing. Something stinks.
The left wants to bad guns because it is part of the new world order, and agenda 21 its all that simple. Its not because of dead human beings.
They support mass killing of babys. About a million or so a year. WAKE UP

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by j-c-c » Sat Mar 03, 2018 12:50 am

exhaustgases wrote:
Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:38 pm
They support mass killing of babys.
Got any proof?

exhaustgases
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:03 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by exhaustgases » Sat Mar 03, 2018 2:28 am

j-c-c wrote:
Sat Mar 03, 2018 12:50 am
exhaustgases wrote:
Fri Mar 02, 2018 9:38 pm
They support mass killing of babys.
Got any proof?
Yeah, statistics of abortions, and then they even sold parts from them didn't they? I guess you don't read or listen to the news. That is the demo c rat
political platform supporting abortions.

Have you looked up the teacher that I mentioned? Or the girl walking with that Nicholas guy? Learn something new.

lefty o
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:50 am

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by lefty o » Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:33 am

thats a fact, the most dangerous place for a baby is in the womb. more are killed there than anywhere else. though since the liberal left sanctions that, it is OK!

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6186
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by David Redszus » Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:50 pm

lefty o wrote:
Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:33 am
thats a fact, the most dangerous place for a baby is in the womb. more are killed there than anywhere else. though since the liberal left sanctions that, it is OK!
Each year approximately 650,000 legal abortions are performed. Black women in states with large black populations are most likely (61%) to have an abortion. Those states are: Alabama, Dist of Columbia, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi.

I for one, see nothing wrong with a woman who elects to have an abortion for whatever reason she sees fit. It is not murder and the rest of the world does not see it as that. In fact, if a woman knows that she will not be able to provide for her child (at that time in her life) I feel she is socially responsible to terminate the pregnancy.

The most dangerous place for an un-wanted child is on the streets of society where it will be subjected to un-speakable conditions and torments. Abortions are one alternatives to child homicides, suicides and life in prison.

Putting subjective morality aside, which choice is best for the whole of society?
If you are against abortion; don't have one. But don't tell anyone else what they can or cannot do.

The conservative right is as goofy about abortion as the liberal left is loony about gun control.

lefty o
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:50 am

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by lefty o » Sat Mar 03, 2018 5:21 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:50 pm
lefty o wrote:
Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:33 am
thats a fact, the most dangerous place for a baby is in the womb. more are killed there than anywhere else. though since the liberal left sanctions that, it is OK!
Each year approximately 650,000 legal abortions are performed. Black women in states with large black populations are most likely (61%) to have an abortion. Those states are: Alabama, Dist of Columbia, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi.

I for one, see nothing wrong with a woman who elects to have an abortion for whatever reason she sees fit. It is not murder and the rest of the world does not see it as that. In fact, if a woman knows that she will not be able to provide for her child (at that time in her life) I feel she is socially responsible to terminate the pregnancy.

The most dangerous place for an un-wanted child is on the streets of society where it will be subjected to un-speakable conditions and torments. Abortions are one alternatives to child homicides, suicides and life in prison.

Putting subjective morality aside, which choice is best for the whole of society?
If you are against abortion; don't have one. But don't tell anyone else what they can or cannot do.

The conservative right is as goofy about abortion as the liberal left is loony about gun control.
not gonna argue abortion one way or the other, just used it as an example.

User avatar
woody b
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1290
Joined: Thu Jun 27, 2013 6:58 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by woody b » Sat Mar 03, 2018 7:19 pm

David, and others, my cynical, mean side says a pregnant Woman should be able to show that she can provide for her child, or be forced to have an abortion, as well as being spayed. Forced sterilization would be the "correct" term, but since they're breeding like animals, I used the animal term. If the Father is found, neuter him too. My Christian side says it's murder. I believe the Father should have a say too. While it's true that it's the Womans body, it's also the Father child. (At least in cases where the Father is known)
I used to be a people person, but people ruined it.

Kenova
Pro
Pro
Posts: 444
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Ontario, Can.

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by Kenova » Sun Mar 04, 2018 12:01 pm

David Redszus wrote:
Sat Mar 03, 2018 4:50 pm
lefty o wrote:
Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:33 am
thats a fact, the most dangerous place for a baby is in the womb. more are killed there than anywhere else. though since the liberal left sanctions that, it is OK!
Each year approximately 650,000 legal abortions are performed. Black women in states with large black populations are most likely (61%) to have an abortion. Those states are: Alabama, Dist of Columbia, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi.

I for one, see nothing wrong with a woman who elects to have an abortion for whatever reason she sees fit. It is not murder and the rest of the world does not see it as that. In fact, if a woman knows that she will not be able to provide for her child (at that time in her life) I feel she is socially responsible to terminate the pregnancy.

The most dangerous place for an un-wanted child is on the streets of society where it will be subjected to un-speakable conditions and torments. Abortions are one alternatives to child homicides, suicides and life in prison.

Putting subjective morality aside, which choice is best for the whole of society?
If you are against abortion; don't have one. But don't tell anyone else what they can or cannot do.

The conservative right is as goofy about abortion as the liberal left is loony about gun control.
Very well said.

Ken
Over the hill but still learning!
Retaining it is the hard part.

sanfordandson
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5175
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 6:28 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by sanfordandson » Sun Mar 04, 2018 1:51 pm

Image

Gotta love trump style conservatism! =D>

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by j-c-c » Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:56 pm

lefty o wrote:
Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:33 am
thats a fact, the most dangerous place for a baby is in the womb. more are killed there than anywhere else. though since the liberal left sanctions that, it is OK!
Using your definition of "baby", more kids are sexually abused in the womb, against their will, and i don't hear a peep about that perversion.

But then i should not assume all you righteous god fearing high horse riders ever have had [Blank Post] with a pregnant female.

STOP SEXUALLY ABUSING BABIES. [-X

(trying to stay in the moment here) :roll:

lefty o
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1003
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:50 am

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by lefty o » Sun Mar 04, 2018 4:44 pm

j-c-c wrote:
Sun Mar 04, 2018 2:56 pm
lefty o wrote:
Sat Mar 03, 2018 11:33 am
thats a fact, the most dangerous place for a baby is in the womb. more are killed there than anywhere else. though since the liberal left sanctions that, it is OK!
Using your definition of "baby", more kids are sexually abused in the womb, against their will, and i don't hear a peep about that perversion.

But then i should not assume all you righteous god fearing high horse riders ever have had [Blank Post] with a pregnant female.

STOP SEXUALLY ABUSING BABIES. [-X

(trying to stay in the moment here) :roll:
you wont hear me arguing for or against it. its merely a fact more kids are killed in the womb than in schools. just happens the liberal chants are always "its for the children", well if that were true they would do a lot of things differently, but they dont.

RevTheory
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3620
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:45 am

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by RevTheory » Sun Mar 04, 2018 6:30 pm

Saul Alinsky's 8 Steps to Socialism. #7 bothers me the most but all demonstrate today's "democrat" party.

1: Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people

2: Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3: Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4: Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5: Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

6: Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.

7: Religion — Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools.

8: Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by j-c-c » Sun Mar 04, 2018 7:11 pm

RevTheory wrote:
Sun Mar 04, 2018 6:30 pm
Saul Alinsky's 8 Steps to Socialism. #7 bothers me the most but all demonstrate today's "democrat" party.

1: Healthcare — Control healthcare and you control the people

2: Poverty — Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.

3: Debt — Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.

4: Gun Control — Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.

5: Welfare — Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income).

6: Education — Take control of what people read and listen to — take control of what children learn in school.

7: Religion — Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools.

8: Class Warfare — Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
The US has had a great deal of socialism since FDR, you want to drop Social Security for a start, just to show how much your followers agree with you?

Socialism is simply a "paper tiger" to to stir up the masses who are willfully blind or poorly informed, or maybe just not too bright, or all three.

exhaustgases
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2272
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 9:03 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by exhaustgases » Sun Mar 04, 2018 7:44 pm

Social security should be renamed to what it was intended for "retirement". The wealthy and anyone here that hates the retirement aspect of SS should not have and does not need it. Some of us that had to give our lives and body's to some crook that made millions off my sweat and I got paid bird poop for it had no extra income to play the stock market gambling game or anyother money making gambling game, need SS or like I say retirement.
Where the problem is, is the people that have not earned the retirement, you cut them out not the ones that worked for it. I wish they would have taken more SS out of my checks and way less income tax. All they got to do is take more ss out of paychecks, at least you are banking that money in a sense, you don't bank income tax.

j-c-c
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:03 pm

Re: Liberals scream ban high capacity magazines

Post by j-c-c » Sun Mar 04, 2018 7:58 pm

exhaustgases wrote:
Sun Mar 04, 2018 7:44 pm
Social security should be renamed to what it was intended for "retirement". The wealthy and anyone here that hates the retirement aspect of SS should not have and does not need it. Some of us that had to give our lives and body's to some crook that made millions off my sweat and I got paid bird poop for it had no extra income to play the stock market gambling game or anyother money making gambling game, need SS or like I say retirement.
Where the problem is, is the people that have not earned the retirement, you cut them out not the ones that worked for it. I wish they would have taken more SS out of my checks and way less income tax. All they got to do is take more ss out of paychecks, at least you are banking that money in a sense, you don't bank income tax.
Your understanding of SS is apparently weak.
It was not for retirement, it is funded as a pay as you go system, IE, your SS deductions while working financed those would reached entitlement while you were contributing. Your kids will pay yours. You if you live to avg age, you will get more then you contributed, Its a PONZI scheme that was sold to simple mined gullible public at time when the public was in desperate straights, avg lifespan in 1930 was 63, payments started at 65, it was not for retirement, is was to keep people from having to eat cat food.

It socialism, pure and simple, but so is the public school board, the public library system, the police department, the DOT, the Post office, The FDA, Medicare, etc, the list is long, but waste your time attacking Saul somebody if it makes you feel better pointing all your fellow comrade socialists.

Post Reply