The Shameful Blackout of Thomas, Sowell and Williams

Any topic with a chance of polarization - Not for the easily offended.

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
User avatar
Ken0069
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4521
Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2005 10:25 am
Location: Historic Appomattox County, Va
Contact:

The Shameful Blackout of Thomas, Sowell and Williams

Post by Ken0069 » Thu Aug 10, 2017 9:08 am

I've read articles by Williams and Sowell on Townhall.com for many years and I think both have incredible life stories, ie, where they came from and where they are today! And remember, when these guys came along there was no such thing as "Affirmative Action" or "racial quotas". They did it the old fashioned way, they earned it!

The Shameful Blackout of Thomas, Sowell and Williams
Larry Elder
Aug 10, 2017 12:01 AM

You gotta read THIS one!
Clarence Thomas, one of nine members of the Supreme Court and the second black to ever join the Court, is not in the National Museum of African American History and Culture in Washington, D.C. Asked to explain Thomas' absence, the chief spokeswoman for the Smithsonian said, "The museum's exhibitions are based on themes, not individuals."

Yet the museum plans to add a popular local D.C. television news broadcaster. The museum's founding director, Lonnie Bunch, said the broadcaster "symbolized that it was really important that America was changing and his presence was a symbol of that change." And Thomas, raised in poverty to become only the second black to sit on the Supreme Court, is not "a symbol of that change"?

Left-wing blacks -- and that's the overwhelming majority -- feel that black conservatives like Thomas do not just have different or wrongheaded or illogical views. Thomas' views, to them, damage the black community. Never mind that most Clarence Thomas-haters could not identify a single case Thomas decided with which they disagree.

One line of attack against Thomas goes as follows. Thomas "took advantage" of race-based preferences to get into college and law school, but then "turned his back on those behind" by arguing that such preferences violate the 14th Amendment.

What these critics assert is that but for race-based preferences, Clarence Thomas would likely be working the deep-fryer at McDonald's. Assume, for the moment, that but for race-based preferences, Thomas would not have gotten into the particular schools he attended, College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Massachusetts, and Yale Law School. But in America thousands of colleges and universities, from community colleges to Harvard, accept students of varying abilities with financial assistance readily available. Surely the driven, hardworking, academically oriented Clarence Thomas could have and would have found admission into schools matching his skills and ability.
CARTOONS | Robert Ariail
View Cartoon

Here's another problem with race-based preferences. Studies document a disproportionately high college-dropout rate for minority students admitted with lower test scores and grades than their peers selected without preferences. How is this mismatching of value to the "beneficiary" if it leads to a higher dropout rate, with the frustrated student giving up and leaving school in debt? The student often blames his failure to succeed at this high level on unfair, if not racist, professors.

The African-American Museum's discrimination against Thomas provides just one example of the black anti-conservative bigotry. Here's another. Every year, the black monthly magazine Ebony lists its "Power 100," defined as those "who lead, inspire and demonstrate through their individual talents, the very best in Black America." Each year Thomas is conspicuously absent. Apparently, as a sitting black justice on the Supreme Court of the United States, Thomas does not "lead, inspire and demonstrate ... the very best in Black America."

Ebony not only excludes Clarence Thomas but also shuts out prominent conservatives Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams.

As for Sowell, he's only an economist and writer whom playwright David Mamet once called "our greatest contemporary philosopher." Sowell, who never knew his father, was raised by a great-aunt and her two grown daughters. They lived in Harlem, where he was the first in his family to make it past the sixth grade. He left home at 17, served as a Marine in the Korean War, graduated magna cum laude from Harvard, earned a master's degree at Columbia University the next year, followed by a Ph.D. in economics at the University of Chicago.

Sowell, at 87, authored some four dozen books (not counting revised editions) and wrote hundreds of scholarly articles and essays in periodicals and thousands of newspaper columns. In 2015, Forbes magazine said: "It's a scandal that economist Thomas Sowell has not been awarded the Nobel Prize. No one alive has turned out so many insightful, richly researched books." Yet, thanks in part to the Ebony shutout, many blacks have never heard of him.

How does Ebony justify excluding economist and writer Walter Williams, former chairman of the economics department of George Mason University, where he still teaches? Raised by a single mother, he lived in Philadelphia's Richard Allen housing projects. He served as a private in the Army before earning a bachelor's degree at a state university, followed by a master's and a Ph.D. in economics at UCLA. Williams has written a dozen books on economics and race, including the inspirational "Up From the Projects: An Autobiography," and was recently the subject of a documentary about his life.

The exclusion of people like Clarence Thomas, Thomas Sowell and Walter Williams explains why there's no serious discussion in the black community about government dependency; school choice; the damage done by high taxes, excessive regulation and laws like minimum wage; and why blacks should rethink their allegiance to the Democratic Party.

The failure to acknowledge conservative blacks is a failure to engage their ideas, to the detriment of the community. This is not merely an injustice to them: It is an injustice to all Americans.
The List Rev A =;
Image
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
William Pitt, British Prime-Minister (1759-1806)


Big Boyz Toyz!

Global Warming Is a FRAUD!

RevTheory
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2877
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:45 am

Re: The Shameful Blackout of Thomas, Sowell and Williams

Post by RevTheory » Thu Aug 10, 2017 9:37 am

To a freakshow liberal, the only thing that could possibly be worse for society at large than a white, male, Constitutional-conservative, heterosexual, Christian, is a conservative, black man or a black woman may even be worse!

Edit: You know what's sad is that if a liberal outfit hires a black man or woman, it's praised for "diversity" but if say Donald Trump hires a black man or woman, you'd get every liberal rag and the Trump Troll Trio saying bullshit like "oh that's just Trump's "token n*gger because my crystal ball told me that he's lost all of his support among white people because of all of his laundered Russian money, collusion, etc. and he's hoping to get more of the black vote- assuming he isn't impeached for blatant treason by Christmas."

David Redszus
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6189
Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
Location: Chicago
Contact:

Re: The Shameful Blackout of Thomas, Sowell and Williams

Post by David Redszus » Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:21 pm

Thomas Sowell is one of my favorite authors.
If you have not yet read his book, "Applied Economic", I urge you to do so. It's a great read.

pdq67
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7521
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: The Shameful Blackout of Thomas, Sowell and Williams

Post by pdq67 » Fri Aug 11, 2017 2:13 am

I really think the three are NOT acknowledged is because there is NO token MONEY in doing so!! Take MONEY from WHITEY, give it to the BLACKS and then reap the rewards of so doing it.

Some people might have to take control of their lives and try to live like the three men!

Ain't gonna happen, imho, unless by a very few!

You can call it racist or whatever, but I figure that it is fact!

pdq67

Post Reply