You’re lost. <———-Factgmrocket wrote: ↑Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:33 pmOk, let me get this straight.GRTfast wrote: ↑Thu Nov 15, 2018 6:07 pmAll you’re doing is admitting that you have no idea how science works. Tell me, what profession were those people that wrote the journal article pointing out the flaws in the first one?
I just relayed a report that turned out to be hog wash, and admitted as much by scientists who did the study..
The scientific study was done by the Scripps institution of oceanography
Which a whole load of lefties rely on for data and advice...hence the publication of its report in the journal Nature
I'm not disputing anything they say, or disputing the data, or being the deplorable skeptic I am...
Just posting the very embarrassing backtracking of a report they admitted was totally flawed
So, in a nutshell
1They admitted the report was flawed
2I'm not admitting i know more about science than they do
3Your a jack azz
4The study was totally flawed
The scientific process is self correcting. You’re seeing it in action here. This is how you can know they aren’t all in league together as part of some big conspiracy.
Did they say “we’re sorry, anthropomorphic climate change isn’t a thing”?
It is obvious that you’re very ignorant on this topic. Notice I didn’t say that you’re stupid. That’s a different debate.