transmission weights for GM

Transmission to Rear-end

Moderator: Team

phantomfab
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 4:12 am

transmission weights for GM

Postby phantomfab » Mon Feb 13, 2017 4:08 am

Any body know the rotating weights for alot of GM transmissions? I'm not talking total weight but how much weight is being swung around in the transmission before it get to the driveline. I'm curious of the weights of a th350, th400, powerglide, saginaw 3 speed, and muncie 4 speed. All of which i want to know without th eweight of the clutch or torque converters being involved. Thanks guys for any input, I know this one is a little far out there but i'm really wanting to know. Gearing and amount of gears doesn't matter to me, these weights are wanted to know for reference in a circle track car that isn't shifting. Thanks.

PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4923
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 1:03 pm

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby PackardV8 » Mon Feb 13, 2017 12:59 pm

Does anyone else think transmission internal rotating weight may not be the determining factor in the equation? With the automatics, there's the pump and fluid drag also. Comparing a torque converter versus a roundtrack skeleton flywheel and clutch? Weight of the AT fluid and cooler?

Then, way back, didn't we have a discussion where sprints without the front balance damper weren't any faster, but the engines broke sooner?

Having said all this, I remember way back when in Alabama short-track, the late, great Roundman Amick ran a high-stall converter in front of an in-out box. His plan was to keep the engine up on the cam coming out of the corner. Won a lot of races with it.

Image
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering

pdq67
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7293
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby pdq67 » Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:46 pm

If I recall right?

Onna the old mags printed this information, but finding it???

It was in something like, "percent powertrain loss", for the various automatics.

Don't have a clue about the sticks?

pdq67

User avatar
BOOT
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1279
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 5:23 pm
Location: Michigan

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby BOOT » Mon Feb 13, 2017 6:18 pm

I've kinda wondered this stuff myself, but not messing with trans much I've never even compared parts stock vs aftermarket. I would think it sorta changes per gear, like how weight after the diff gear change is even less beneficial depending on the ratio. So the output shaft wouldn't effect as much compared to the input, still both have a small diameter so the inertia would be much compared to the converter or other parts???
I know as much as I can learn and try to keep an open mind to anything!

If I didn't overthink stuff I wouldn't be on speedtalk!

Greenlight
Pro
Pro
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 10:37 pm

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby Greenlight » Mon Feb 13, 2017 11:37 pm

Project Greenlight

ChevyEFI
New Member
New Member
Posts: 45
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2013 5:59 pm

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby ChevyEFI » Tue Feb 14, 2017 9:52 pm

If you think saving grams and ounces matters, run a TH200(-C) instead of a TH400.

pdq67
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7293
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:05 pm

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby pdq67 » Tue Feb 14, 2017 11:51 pm

ChevyEFI wrote:If you think saving grams and ounces matters, run a TH200(-C) instead of a TH400.


Or a 2-gear circle track stick tranny.

pdq67

phantomfab
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 4:12 am

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby phantomfab » Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:28 am

ChevyEFI wrote:If you think saving grams and ounces matters, run a TH200(-C) instead of a TH400.

I was just wondering how big the difference was. Cause I've always ran a 350 or 400 cause of how cheap they are around where im at. The glides are high dollar and was wondering how much of a weight difference there actually was. And while i was at it i was wondering the weights of the autos to the standards while i was on the topic.

phantomfab
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 4:12 am

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby phantomfab » Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:36 am

PackardV8 wrote:Does anyone else think transmission internal rotating weight may not be the determining factor in the equation? With the automatics, there's the pump and fluid drag also. Comparing a torque converter versus a roundtrack skeleton flywheel and clutch? Weight of the AT fluid and cooler?

Then, way back, didn't we have a discussion where sprints without the front balance damper weren't any faster, but the engines broke sooner?

Having said all this, I remember way back when in Alabama short-track, the late, great Roundman Amick ran a high-stall converter in front of an in-out box. His plan was to keep the engine up on the cam coming out of the corner. Won a lot of races with it.

Image


See i always thought this would work but after talking to some local guys that have tried stall converters have found that the stall converters blew the tires made the car hard to setup cause of the harshness of the converter engaging off the corners and that they were blowing through the converter most of the time later on down the straight away. But they were also trying to mess with running the stall with a higher gear and let the converter slip to pull it. They found that a tighter than stock converter with a lower gear worked a lot better. Still had the quickness off the corner and didnt blow through the converter on down the track. Now they did find out the problem of blowing through the converter went away with a lower gear but the converter was pointless then cause they were above the stall speed coming off the corner. So in the end, running a lower gear with a tighter converter was faster rpm to car speed then the car was with a high gear and a stall cause the converter was so loose it was just blowing threw it.

phantomfab
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 4:12 am

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby phantomfab » Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:39 am

pdq67 wrote:
ChevyEFI wrote:If you think saving grams and ounces matters, run a TH200(-C) instead of a TH400.


Or a 2-gear circle track stick tranny.

pdq67


clutch and flywheel weight is alot higher then a direct drive coupler and flexplate. but i was wondering if internal weight made up for the difference.

phantomfab
Member
Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Dec 25, 2016 4:12 am

Re: transmission weights for GM

Postby phantomfab » Wed Feb 15, 2017 2:49 am

pdq67 wrote:If I recall right?

Onna the old mags printed this information, but finding it???

It was in something like, "percent powertrain loss", for the various automatics.

Don't have a clue about the sticks?

pdq67


yeah on a chassis dyno i've seen the power go from a 19 percent loss to a 15 percent loss going from a 4l60e to a t56 but the dyno isnt really a good way to tell the differnce between transmissions, The reason being a dyno doesnt show how much the transmission slows it down, a glide car puts more power to the ground but picks up 2 tenths at the dragstrip with a 400 cause of the extra gear. I know apples to oranges in a drag car that shifts to a circle track car in the same gear all the time. Those magazines do power comparisons on a chassis dyno. But with a stock or lightweight clutch to a car with a converter. You'll blow through the converter. In the circle track car a direct drive is legal in the autos. They gain the advantage of the weight on a 6 pound flex plate to a 16 lbs flywheel. Those being the lightest legally. And a 21 lbs clutch to a 4 lbs coupler for the auto. That was one of the reasons i was asking for weights not including the drives, cause i already know the weights of what i can run.


Return to “Driveline”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests