spool compared to stock posi

Transmission to Rear-end

Moderator: Team

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby 81camaro » Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:35 pm

Thanks for all the great replys. I hate to hear about loosing a tenth, the rear end in my car is the stock 8.5 10 bolt. Im going to bigger axles and c clip eliminators. Everyone i have spoke to at the local track bracket racers to nhra stock and superstockers run spools. Safety first..IMO Thanks Mike
81camaro
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 9:10 am

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby scottshwtm » Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:48 pm

The posts saying you will loose a tenth changing to a spool is BS. Totally incorrect!!!!
scottshwtm
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby MadBill » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:03 am

You're probably right, Scott.

Joe Sherman has only been building and racing championship winning engines and cars full time for over 40 years, as well as being victorious in the first ever Engine Masters Challenge, so he's likely just old and confused when he says:

"Re: Ring and pinion efficiency?
by donc » Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:48 am

bigjoe1 wrote:
I have seen a loss of one tenth of a second MANY times when a 9 inch is installed. I have also seen where a spool will lose a full tenth over a posi MANY time too.


JOE SHERMAN RACING
X2 Ive seen exactly the same thing, Go from posi to spool and loose ETdonc
Expert
"There's no product that can't be made cheaper and worse."
MadBill
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 7589
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: Northeast of Toronto, Ontario Canada

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby scottshwtm » Thu Feb 02, 2012 8:16 pm

MadBill wrote:You're probably right, Scott.

Joe Sherman has only been building and racing championship winning engines and cars full time for over 40 years, as well as being victorious in the first ever Engine Masters Challenge, so he's likely just old and confused when he says:

"Re: Ring and pinion efficiency?
by donc » Sun Oct 23, 2011 11:48 am

bigjoe1 wrote:
I have seen a loss of one tenth of a second MANY times when a 9 inch is installed. I have also seen where a spool will lose a full tenth over a posi MANY time too.


JOE SHERMAN RACING
X2 Ive seen exactly the same thing, Go from posi to spool and loose ETdonc
Expert


Yea.. You're probably right.. He's just confused !
Really don't matter how long he's been building engines, that statement is just wrong! I've replaced many 10 bolts,12 bolts with the 9 inch and the car has NEVER slowed down!

When I replaced my 12 bolt with a posi with a spooled 9 inch my car ran the EXACT same number. NOTHING CHANGED! :roll:
scottshwtm
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby af2 » Thu Feb 02, 2012 9:50 pm

Some people just never listen and therefor never learn. [-X

If you are talking a 12 second screamer you probably wont see a difference.LOL
GURU is only a name.
Adam
User avatar
af2
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 5236
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2007 4:42 pm
Location: Grass Valley, CA :Northern Foothills

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby scottshwtm » Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:22 pm

Not much to learn on this one. Been building Differential's for 25 years. Its plain and simple BS to use that as a general statement. I've had many instances where I removed a posi 12 bolt and installed a spooled 9 inch with the same ratio and picked up ET. Now changing ratio's is a different story.
scottshwtm
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby Supershafts » Fri Feb 03, 2012 8:31 am

Wait how do you explain being able to push a car in with one person and then putting a 9" known fact power robber in and needing the helpers in the shop to help push the same car out with the SAME ratio or one with a slightly different ratio...
We Race, We Vote!! Limotorsports.org
Supershafts.com
Supershafts
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 209
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 12:13 pm
Location: long island, NY

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby scottshwtm » Fri Feb 03, 2012 10:29 am

Supershafts wrote:Wait how do you explain being able to push a car in with one person and then putting a 9" known fact power robber in and needing the helpers in the shop to help push the same car out with the SAME ratio or one with a slightly different ratio...


Nothing to explain on that one really. Pushing a spooled car in a straight line is not a problem.But once you turn the wheel its a SOB. Last time I checked the 1/4 mile track was a straight line. As far as the "power robbing" 9 inch? With a 9 inch "set up correctly" I just don't see that.
scottshwtm
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby MadBill » Fri Feb 03, 2012 11:52 am

Wouldn't any difference in the rolling radii of the tires (build tolerances, air pressure variations, corner weights, torque reactions) generate similar drag forces going down the track, as the front wheels were steered to correct for them?
"There's no product that can't be made cheaper and worse."
MadBill
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 7589
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: Northeast of Toronto, Ontario Canada

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby scottshwtm » Fri Feb 03, 2012 9:03 pm

MadBill wrote:Wouldn't any difference in the rolling radii of the tires (build tolerances, air pressure variations, corner weights, torque reactions) generate similar drag forces going down the track, as the front wheels were steered to correct for them?


Very possible.. But I sure havn't seen it effect the ET's. :D
scottshwtm
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun May 23, 2010 1:57 pm

Re: spool compared to stock posi

Postby MadBill » Fri May 11, 2012 11:06 pm

scottshwtm wrote:... As far as the "power robbing" 9 inch? With a 9 inch "set up correctly" I just don't see that.


Here's a chart from a very well controlled Car Craft test showing substantially less power loss from a 12 bolt Vs. a 9". Full report here: http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles/cc ... ewall.html
Attachments
ccrp_0806_21_z+chevy_chevelle_rear_axle_swap+peak_power_comparison.jpg
(39.57 KiB) Not downloaded yet
"There's no product that can't be made cheaper and worse."
MadBill
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 7589
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: Northeast of Toronto, Ontario Canada

Previous

Return to Driveline

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest