Page 1 of 1
I guess this is not a good fuel to use.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 3:22 am
by Engguy
http://r-calfusa.com/news_releases/2011/110901-epa.htm
I'm just wondering where all the intelligent people are?
Isn't it funny that radiation is not bad? But everything else is?
Where in ..... are the oath takers?
Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 11:03 am
by Unkl Ian
The intelligent people are obviously NOT in government.
Between this one, and the Gibson guitar saga, the Lunatics really have taken over the Asylum.
Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 12:24 pm
by Engguy
I think they are in the gov, and following exactly what there controllers want them to do. Thats why everything is a farce. People vote for something and it means nothing because if it isn't what they want it is over turned, and you get what everyone voted against, its happened a bunch here. Sports stadiums are just one item.
So why the constant demonizing of complete non issues as far as things that are bad, and the complete quiet on the one thing that is
the most destructive. ie RADIATION ? And where are the ones that take the oath????? Is that just lip service too?
Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:02 pm
by Rizzle
http://www.epa.gov/region07/priorities/ ... id_hay.htm
figured I'd look into why EPA said hay was a pollutant. Turns out they didn't.
Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.
Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2011 7:53 pm
by machine shop tom
Hey (hay)!
Don't let facts cloud somebody's paranoia!!
tom
Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 6:27 am
by enigma57
Methinks this feedlot owner's troubles stem mainly from his failure to grease the 'right' palms and to make campaign contributions to the 'right' party.
After all...... Its the 'Chicago way' and that is how the current 'administration' in Washington operates when it picks winners and losers.
They seem to think of tax revenues and the US Treasury as a large slush fund to buy votes and to pay back political campaign contributors...... And selective enforcement of laws and regulations as a 'protection racket'.
Just my dos centavos,
Harry
Re: I guess this is not a good fuel to use.
Posted: Sun Sep 25, 2011 4:41 pm
by Engguy
machine shop tom wrote:
Hey (hay)!
Don't let facts cloud somebody's paranoia!!
tom
So Radiation is paranoia? Naaa its the nasty mineral oil, they created a cute name for that is the bad thing right? Talk about paranoia.