Ok, a motorcycle has front steering like a bicycle, a fork supporting the tire axle and handlebars. This pivots on rolling element bearings. It was loose ball bearings from early on and then in the 70's changed to caged tapered rollers like a car wheel bearing. Recently, the trend has been back to balls, but caged.....This is especially so on hyper performance street bikes and in racing...
At higher speeds motorcycles steers by leaning in basic terms ....To go left the rider steers slightly to the right, the bike leans left and the front wheel is actually a few degrees right as the bike arcs to the left....The rider also shifts his weight into the lean but the basic action is pushing and pulling on the handle bars...
So why change from roller to ball? I don't think they cheaper... Is a ball better for small angle of rotation? Does a ball have less resistance to movement so the rider has a better feel? bikes are all about what the rider feels the machine doing.....Any ideas?
Ball VS roller bearing Motorcycle
Moderator: Team
Ball VS roller bearing Motorcycle
Motorcycle land speed racing... wearing animal hides and clinging to vibrating oily machines propelled by fire
Re: Ball VS roller bearing Motorcycle
Just randomly, the ball system is usually a few ounces lighter than a typical roller and races. It's also often self-contained rather than separate race.
And yes, I remember back in the bad ol days, a few long fast interstate rides and the Triumph/BSA races would have indents from the loose balls and the steering would develop a ratchety feel. They had to be replaced every few years.
I'd assume for straightaway work, you'd prefer the '67 and later frame with more rake/trail, but I've never forgiven them for the change, because I'd grown up with the early bikes and they just felt more lively in the seat.
And yes, I remember back in the bad ol days, a few long fast interstate rides and the Triumph/BSA races would have indents from the loose balls and the steering would develop a ratchety feel. They had to be replaced every few years.
I'd assume for straightaway work, you'd prefer the '67 and later frame with more rake/trail, but I've never forgiven them for the change, because I'd grown up with the early bikes and they just felt more lively in the seat.
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
Re: Ball VS roller bearing Motorcycle
PackardV8 wrote:Just randomly, the ball system is usually a few ounces lighter than a typical roller and races. It's also often self-contained rather than separate race.
And yes, I remember back in the bad ol days, a few long fast interstate rides and the Triumph/BSA races would have indents from the loose balls and the steering would develop a ratchety feel. They had to be replaced every few years.
I'd assume for straightaway work, you'd prefer the '67 and later frame with more rake/trail, but I've never forgiven them for the change, because I'd grown up with the early bikes and they just felt more lively in the seat.
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
Re: Ball VS roller bearing Motorcycle
Jack, I'm referring to bikes in general, mainline sport bike newer than about 2007...
Motorcycle land speed racing... wearing animal hides and clinging to vibrating oily machines propelled by fire
Re: Ball VS roller bearing Motorcycle
Ball bearings have somewhat less static drag. They can fret more readily if towed for long on a bumpy trailer or such.
Re: Ball VS roller bearing Motorcycle
Olefud wrote:Ball bearings have somewhat less static drag. They can fret more readily if towed for long on a bumpy trailer or such.
Some bike racers spoke up and said the less drag of ball bearings is the reason, gives more precise steering ......
Motorcycle land speed racing... wearing animal hides and clinging to vibrating oily machines propelled by fire