Jesel Rockers

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Jesel Rockers

Postby Mike Rogers » Thu Mar 17, 2005 2:40 pm

Has any one seen the ratio of the rocker arms off on Jesel shaft rockers.I,am do the cam checks for the Hooters engine i,am building and we must have .625 lift with no lash.The cam lift is .347 rocker ratio 1.8
should come up .6246 at the valve.What i,am getting is .640 lift at the valve tryed both sides of engine #1 and #6 with two diffrent rockers.This is on the intake side.Ex. side is the same but with a 1.7 rocker and cam lift of .367 i get valve lift of .633 with 0 lash.
Mike Rogers
215-674-5240
EQ Cylinder Heads
http://www.rogersperformance.com
Mike Rogers
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:57 pm
Location: Hatboro PA

Postby shawn » Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:00 pm

Ahhhhhhhhh, the old closely guarded Jesel secret. The rockers are actually more ratio than they advertise. I ran across the same thing and called to ask them why my lift at the valve was so different than what is was suppose to be. They told me most all of their rockers have about .05 more in the ratio than advertised, for deflection and other things. I thought i was doing something wrong, too!If you add the .05 to the advertised ratio, you'll see what i mean.
Shawn
shawn
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2003 11:09 am
Location: Northwest

Postby idunno » Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:02 pm

Did you check the lobe lift on the cam yourself?
idunno
 

Postby Mike Rogers » Thu Mar 17, 2005 3:04 pm

Yes i,am an engine machine shop.
Mike Rogers
215-674-5240
EQ Cylinder Heads
http://www.rogersperformance.com
Mike Rogers
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:57 pm
Location: Hatboro PA

Postby idunno » Thu Mar 17, 2005 4:07 pm

Then the ratio's have to be incorrect like you suspected.Any Geometry issues would only reduce lift at the valve as well as pushrod angles.
idunno
 

Postby BRENT FAY » Thu Mar 17, 2005 5:47 pm

When I would need shaft rockers for a head that no one made yet I would call W.W. Engineering in Georgia to make up rockers. He would want specs of head and ratio needed and would ask what lash you were going to run and he would build the lash into the ratio so net lift would be whatever ratio times lobe lift. ex. 1.8 x .450 = .810 valve opening with lash set. Wilfred made some nice stuff. He wasnt to far from the Elliots or W.J. which he did alot of prototype development work for those guys. Brent
BRENT FAY
Member
Member
 
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 3:39 pm
Location: mansfield,ohio

Postby ALKYBURNER » Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:45 pm

how do we get a hold of the phone number for WW engineering
ALKYBURNER
Member
Member
 
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 7:13 pm

WW Engineering

Postby rmbuilder » Thu Mar 17, 2005 7:53 pm

The number is:
(706) 216-8388
Bob
rmbuilder
Member
Member
 
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2004 9:44 am
Location: Rochester, NY USA

Postby idunno » Fri Mar 18, 2005 9:51 pm

his name id Williford Boutalier,w.w. stands for Wild Williford
idunno
 

Re: Jesel Rockers

Postby OldSStroker » Sat Mar 19, 2005 10:30 am

Mike Rogers wrote:Has any one seen the ratio of the rocker arms off on Jesel shaft rockers.I,am do the cam checks for the Hooters engine i,am building and we must have .625 lift with no lash.The cam lift is .347 rocker ratio 1.8
should come up .6246 at the valve.What i,am getting is .640 lift at the valve tryed both sides of engine #1 and #6 with two diffrent rockers.This is on the intake side.Ex. side is the same but with a 1.7 rocker and cam lift of .367 i get valve lift of .633 with 0 lash.


.347 lift lobes, like Comp's TK Lift Rule lobes assume exact 1.8 ratios. Same thing for .367 CR Lift Rule lobes. Depending on the rocker geometry, rocker ratios vary from valve closed to full open. Obviously the full open ratio is critical in your engine. The "1.8" is about 2.5% and the "1.7" about 1.5% high using your numbers. Not much, but critical if Hooters tech guys really check.

You are checking with full valve spring pressure I assume. Even a very stiff rocker deflects a measurable amount under valve open spring loads.

What do other Hooters builders run for rockers? If Jesel is the preferred brand, perhaps Jesel has slightly special "1.8s" and "1.7s" just for Hooters engines. They machine most of their stuff in house, I believe, so varying the ratio a bit should be easy.

You can't be the only builder in this prediciment.
OldSStroker
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1262
Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 6:14 pm
Location: Upstate New York

Rocker ratio

Postby Adger Smith » Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:15 am

With the stands set at the correct height to get rocker contact correct at the valve stem shorten the pushrod & turn the rocker adjuster more turns out to reduce the ratio.
Adger Smith
Adger Smith Performance Engines
903 794 7223 shop
903 824 4924 cell
adgersperf@aol.com e-mail
www.adgersperf.com Web site (view only)
Adger Smith
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 6:35 pm
Location: Texarkana, Ar-Tx

Postby Mike Rogers » Sun Mar 20, 2005 9:05 am

I order a set of 1.75 and 1.65 and we will see if that fixes the problem it should.

Thanks for every ones help
Mike Rogers
215-674-5240
EQ Cylinder Heads
http://www.rogersperformance.com
Mike Rogers
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:57 pm
Location: Hatboro PA

update:

Postby Mike Rogers » Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:06 pm

Just wanted to share what i found.I order 2 rocker arms with .5 less ratio than what i had and it reduced the lift to ware i need it .625.So it seems even with the major companys they add .5 extra in ratio to there rockers due to flex in the arm itself and the push rod most pople would not care about the extra lift but i have a rule to work with.



Thanks all for your help
Mike Rogers
215-674-5240
EQ Cylinder Heads
http://www.rogersperformance.com
Mike Rogers
Pro
Pro
 
Posts: 492
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:57 pm
Location: Hatboro PA

RR Ratio

Postby Adger Smith » Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:26 pm

Mike,
Take the original rockers and set then up with the adjuster cup out of the rocker seat by 2 1/2 turns. this will require shorter pushrods. The rocker ratio is set at 1 1/2 turns out of the cup seat. It will reduce the ratio because of the placement angle of the adjuster cup. It pulls the adjuster cup away from the fulcrum, making the ratio smaller. I could go on,--- if you want more call (903) 794-7223
Adger Smith
Adger Smith Performance Engines
903 794 7223 shop
903 824 4924 cell
adgersperf@aol.com e-mail
www.adgersperf.com Web site (view only)
Adger Smith
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1268
Joined: Sun Jul 25, 2004 6:35 pm
Location: Texarkana, Ar-Tx

Re: RR Ratio

Postby k-star » Tue Mar 22, 2005 7:17 am

Adger Smith wrote:Mike,
Take the original rockers and set then up with the adjuster cup out of the rocker seat by 2 1/2 turns. this will require shorter pushrods. The rocker ratio is set at 1 1/2 turns out of the cup seat. It will reduce the ratio because of the placement angle of the adjuster cup. It pulls the adjuster cup away from the fulcrum, making the ratio smaller. I could go on,--- if you want more call (903) 794-7223


Adger, is there a calculated amount that the ratio changes by that you can figure the length of push rod you need in relation to needed rocker ratio?????

thanks ,Keith
“If I hit you with this you’re going to be numb, that’s why they call them numb-chucks “Si Robertson
http://www.kstarautomotive.com
User avatar
k-star
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 1670
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 1:17 pm
Location: york pa

Next

Return to Engine Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 50casino, bigdaddy, CarterHendricks, cuslog, Google [Bot], JWRE, novadude, runawy9, sdm6004, zums and 28 guests