tbi chevy cams

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

bhodges83
New Member
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 7:33 pm
Location:

tbi chevy cams

Post by bhodges83 »

Would like to get some real answers on the question of what is the largest cam i can run in a stock 93 chevrolet pickup with a 5.7 TBI without causing bad driveabilty problems.I have heard that a 268 is the largest one.I also have a friend that put a 270 in a 92 chevy and it run fair with a vaccum canister.All of the cam companies i have called give the same answers "we recommend our tbi cams" which are not very much different than stock.
ou812
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 948
Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 11:23 pm
Location: SoCal
Contact:

Post by ou812 »

TBI is very sensitive to camshafts...if you want more power, change the heads. Those truck heads are very restrictive.
I would say the biggest cam I've used is the xe262 computer cam from Comp. But I change the heads, so this helps power alot. I also use a 6" rod to lighten the piston, and KB pistons.
Then do some chamber porting and minor short turn work to the heads and I run 1.6 x 1.5 rockers. Seems to work really well with the bigger throttle body and a spacer.
You can really feel the power of all these mods, and the more you do the better they run. If you only do one or two things, it's not very noticeable.

Brian
User avatar
needforspeed66gt
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2069
Joined: Sat May 06, 2006 6:18 pm
Location: California

Post by needforspeed66gt »

We do a lot of performance 383 TBI motors, they pass smog and the drivability is great. We do a scat 3.75" stroke/Manley 6.0" rod/Wiseco forged piston/World Sportsman II(EO Number for smog), put the big block injectors in the TBI unit and tune the computer - and I forget the exact cam specs. They are very well running packages, make about 250hp at the tires with the TBI manifold being the bottleneck - if you do a carb conversion its an instant 40hp increase.

The Holley TBI manifold will pick you up some over the factory, but not much.

I can look up the cam we use tomorrow.
Nate @steeldustmachine
Engine Machinist
alexwelsh
Member
Member
Posts: 80
Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2007 11:12 am
Location:

Post by alexwelsh »

Pick a cam with a duration of no more than 220 @ .050 with a lobe center as far apart as you can (114 works well). This will give you a good vacuum signal so the MAP sensor won't go nuts. Better heads (like Vortecs) are a good idea. There are few options for intake manifolds, but your motor will be mild enough that a manifold change won't give you phenominal results anyway. There are changes you can do on the TBI unit that will give good results (injector spacers, BBC injectors, profiled inlet vanes). Free up the exhaust, but don't go too big on the tube diameter. Believe it or not, a single 3" works better than two 2.5s with a TBI.
gmc406
Member
Member
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Sask Canada

Post by gmc406 »

I have a 91 GMC with 406 small block. I'm using a larger Comp cam with 1.6 rockers. As long as you have somebody to re-tune your chip, you can run whatever you want. I run 13.1's at 2500 feet. The truck runs well on the street and is good on fuel too.
Last edited by gmc406 on Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jmarkaudio
Vendor
Posts: 4222
Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:26 am
Location: Florida

Post by jmarkaudio »

If you are talking about using the stock computer and chip, you don't want to deviate too much. It will compensate for small changes, not large ones. This is why the cam company cams are not much different than the factory cam.
Mark Whitener
www.racingfuelsystems.com
____

Good work isn't cheap and cheap work can't be good.
User avatar
F1Fever
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:17 am
Location: Okla
Contact:

Post by F1Fever »

Is what really throws them out of tune is the map sensor reading all over the place and very low on vacuum correct? Couldn't a guy unhook the map sensor then the cpu will only run from the TPS, RPM and temp, correct?
I was no longer driving the car consciously. I was driving it by a kind of instinct, only I was in a different dimension.
West Siloam Dispensary
gmc406
Member
Member
Posts: 190
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:00 am
Location: Sask Canada

Post by gmc406 »

F1Fever wrote:Is what really throws them out of tune is the map sensor reading all over the place and very low on vacuum correct? Couldn't a guy unhook the map sensor then the cpu will only run from the TPS, RPM and temp, correct?
The map sensor is what tells the CPU when the engine is under load, like when you put it in gear. By installing a larger cam, the vacuum drops, and the CPU will drop in more fuel. Getting your chip reprogrammed will counter-act this.
User avatar
F1Fever
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:17 am
Location: Okla
Contact:

Post by F1Fever »

On a stock vehicle if the Map sensor is unplugged it has little effect on the driveability. :?:
I was no longer driving the car consciously. I was driving it by a kind of instinct, only I was in a different dimension.
West Siloam Dispensary
ZIGGY
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1297
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 3:15 am
Location: Dallas, Texas

tbi chevy cams

Post by ZIGGY »

Needfor...

If porting the stock tbi manifold was a viable option, I assume you would have said so (?). Same for adapting a carb manifold to the tbi ?
User avatar
F1Fever
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1693
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 9:17 am
Location: Okla
Contact:

Post by F1Fever »

I find this interesting as a couple weeks ago I played with the idea of a duntov 30-30 cam, highrise single plane and TBI, or possibly a lowrise 2x4 with dual TBI's. Then I came to my senses and got a vortec :wink:
I was no longer driving the car consciously. I was driving it by a kind of instinct, only I was in a different dimension.
West Siloam Dispensary
machine shop tom
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2404
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:16 pm
Location: N L Michigan

Post by machine shop tom »

Anything more than 204-210 @.050 and tighter than 107 centerlines (at that duration) will be dicey with the stock TBI set up, which also doesn't like the added flow of Vor-Tec heads, either with or without a cam change.

tom
Pray for a secular future.

We used to speak to tell things , now they tell things to speak.

Si Vis Pacem, Para Bellum
482OLDS
New Member
New Member
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Bolingbrook Illinois

Post by 482OLDS »

I used a Lunati 207/213 .437/.454 on a 112 lsa in a stock .030 over 400 smallblock to replace the 350 in my 92 Chevy 1/2 ton.

Also went with stock Vortecs and a GMPP intake with Edelbrock shortys and 2 1/4 duals with no cats.

It wouldn't run right even after turning up the fuel pressure. I put stock 454 TBI injectors in it and it's almost perfect...

Great low end for towing was what I wanted and it works.

Im sure there would be a lot more up top with a good intake and carb though
:?
1989TransAm
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15481
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:43 pm
Location: Cypress, California

Post by 1989TransAm »

I don't know what your ultimate goals are but if you get a customized tune for the computer it opens up alot of opportunities. In fact I would just buget some money for a custom dyno tune as part of the upgrade.

That way you can maximize the gas milage, horsepower and drivability. Adding a cam, headers and an improved intake system will need a tune to get the most out of it.
User avatar
ThomasL
Member
Member
Posts: 172
Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 5:49 pm
Location:

Post by ThomasL »

I used a Crane HMV260 retarded 5 degrees to give the same event timing as their computor controlled cam. 3" single Exh, chip, K+N, valve bowl work. Works really well with the EGR unhooked, but has a real lean spot at idle if the EGR is operational. It needs a reprogram to fix that but I have an 03 6 liter now so I won't be doing anything more to it. Really happy with the power though.
Post Reply