p85 engine from page 12
https://8000vueltas.com/wp-content/uplo ... ngines.pdf
Moderator: Team
Yes, no head gasket failure at higher compression ratios was one reason for the monoblock. Define "insane". The Offys on alcohol ran 14:1 for 500 miles, sometimes. The inherent Offy problem has always been a 270" 4-cylinder is trying to shake itself apart every revolution. When the stroke was shortened to the 255", the vibration problem got less bad. The monoblock design loved turbo boost and by the time the turbos were downsized to 160"- 170" with the same architecture, they were almost reliable while making three times the horsepower.
If the bore is that small and the valves are at a 45 degree angle, how do you get the VALVES in and out?PackardV8 wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2019 10:13 pm Casting the head and block as a unit was quite common in the early days. Several of the Harry Miller designs done by Leo Goosen, including what became known as the Offenhauser, were done this way.
Just imagine the difficulty of achieving a precision valve seat when working up through a small diameter cylinder (the Miller 91" straight-eight has a 2.200" bore diameter) and at 45-degrees. There's literally no line of sight; it had to be done by feel.
modok,
The ports are super low, the short side makes almost a u-turn; so the valves can be very short.peejay wrote: ↑Fri May 17, 2019 6:51 amIf the bore is that small and the valves are at a 45 degree angle, how do you get the VALVES in and out?PackardV8 wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2019 10:13 pm Casting the head and block as a unit was quite common in the early days. Several of the Harry Miller designs done by Leo Goosen, including what became known as the Offenhauser, were done this way.
Just imagine the difficulty of achieving a precision valve seat when working up through a small diameter cylinder (the Miller 91" straight-eight has a 2.200" bore diameter) and at 45-degrees. There's literally no line of sight; it had to be done by feel.