Building an engine without a head...

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

digger
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2725
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 6:39 am
Location:

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by digger »

digger wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 11:32 pm I think bmw's last f1 engines the cylinder head and crankcase were a single piece
p85 engine from page 12

https://8000vueltas.com/wp-content/uplo ... ngines.pdf
Shaner
Member
Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2019 10:59 am
Location:

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by Shaner »

Couldn't you I crease the compression to insane levels??
Newold1
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1963
Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2016 9:50 am
Location:

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by Newold1 »

Actually referred to as monoblock engines.
Check out this website.

www.steyr-motors.com
The Older I Get, The Dumber I Get :wink:
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7642
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by PackardV8 »

Shaner wrote: Thu May 16, 2019 8:34 am Couldn't you I crease the compression to insane levels??
Yes, no head gasket failure at higher compression ratios was one reason for the monoblock. Define "insane". The Offys on alcohol ran 14:1 for 500 miles, sometimes. The inherent Offy problem has always been a 270" 4-cylinder is trying to shake itself apart every revolution. When the stroke was shortened to the 255", the vibration problem got less bad. The monoblock design loved turbo boost and by the time the turbos were downsized to 160"- 170" with the same architecture, they were almost reliable while making three times the horsepower.

Considering "insane" compression ratios, diesels run hundreds of thousands of miles with insane compression ratios, but they're built heavier to withstand the forces. Second reason for the monoblock is more strength and less weight.
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
rebelyell
Expert
Expert
Posts: 757
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2018 8:46 am
Location: SOUTH CAROLINA

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by rebelyell »

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-60s-We ... 0543080649

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Very-R ... 0595466086

Chrysler/West Bend Two-Cycle (no valvetrain, just ports)
Aluminum Monobloc crankcase+cylinder+head casting
chromed bore (self-peeling)

had a pair on a POS kart in sixties
peejay
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1946
Joined: Tue Aug 10, 2010 9:16 pm
Location:

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by peejay »

PackardV8 wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 10:13 pm Casting the head and block as a unit was quite common in the early days. Several of the Harry Miller designs done by Leo Goosen, including what became known as the Offenhauser, were done this way.

Just imagine the difficulty of achieving a precision valve seat when working up through a small diameter cylinder (the Miller 91" straight-eight has a 2.200" bore diameter) and at 45-degrees. There's literally no line of sight; it had to be done by feel.
If the bore is that small and the valves are at a 45 degree angle, how do you get the VALVES in and out?
pdq67
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9841
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:05 pm
Location:

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by pdq67 »

modok wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 11:16 pm Offy's, airplanes, old motorcycles. Common pre-war.
Most recent one I can think of is a honda "5 horse" little 160cc guy.
split diagonal crankcase, one cam lobe runs both valves, 25lbs total, very interesting.
modok,

Would you please post back a link to this little engine.

Fascinating to me!

pdq67
pdq67
Guru
Guru
Posts: 9841
Joined: Thu Mar 04, 2010 8:05 pm
Location:

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by pdq67 »

Back again, btw, Rolls Royse used to lap their blocks and heads and didn't use head gaskets if not mistaken?

pdq67
User avatar
modok
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3325
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:50 am
Location:

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by modok »

Honda gc160
found some pics here
https://www.brandnewengines.com/GC160-JY5.aspx
enginenut2
New Member
New Member
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2012 12:18 pm
Location: Tennessee, 40 miles west of Nashville

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by enginenut2 »

Outboard Marine Corporation (OMC) in the late 50's owned Evinrude , Johnson, Cushman, lawn boy, and other. They brought out a Cushman Eagle scooter with a new 9 HP ohv engine. The engine had a removable Cyl with integral head and they made a 2cyl opposed version for their "Truckster". Thousands of these were in use by the postal dept, police depts. and grounds keeping people. These engines were expensive but very durable with pressure oiling , inserted steel rods, press fit pins and small valves to limit output. Valve work was done up through the bore and the cyls had cast in sleeves. Many of the old (pre 1930) engines had head and block cast together but most had the valves serviced through a removable cage or plug. The engine people usually refer to these engines as "jughead" engines and they can be found up to 6" bore or more.
SchmidtMotorWorks
Vendor
Posts: 11003
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:30 am
Location: CA

Re: Building an engine without a head...

Post by SchmidtMotorWorks »

peejay wrote: Fri May 17, 2019 6:51 am
PackardV8 wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 10:13 pm Casting the head and block as a unit was quite common in the early days. Several of the Harry Miller designs done by Leo Goosen, including what became known as the Offenhauser, were done this way.

Just imagine the difficulty of achieving a precision valve seat when working up through a small diameter cylinder (the Miller 91" straight-eight has a 2.200" bore diameter) and at 45-degrees. There's literally no line of sight; it had to be done by feel.
If the bore is that small and the valves are at a 45 degree angle, how do you get the VALVES in and out?
The ports are super low, the short side makes almost a u-turn; so the valves can be very short.
Helping to Deliver the Promise of Flying Cars
Post Reply