More compression or flat tops

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

ClassAct
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1029
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2018 11:55 pm
Location:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by ClassAct »

MadBill wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 7:18 pm
ClassAct wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 5:04 pm...Not all of us desire a stroke so long it could be a diesel and get compression with a small dome.
That's the way a shop I know does it, to make compression with the huge chambers of a Hemi. He doesn't normally build anything under 572" and most are 636", 678", etc.


Well yeah!!! A hemiroid had a chamber the size of Texas and you need stroke to keep the piston weight down on that. I was speaking of wedge stuff. LOL.
User avatar
ptuomov
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:52 am
Location:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by ptuomov »

CamKing wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 1:08 pm
swampbuggy wrote: Sat Apr 27, 2019 10:07 pm If you have a given cam with a 106 L.S.A and the valves are lets say .150" off their seats at T.D.C. on the exhaust stroke (installed straight-up, sometimes called) , and you have a second cam identical except you give it a 110 L.S.A. you will now have less lift at T.D.C. and more P/V clearance . Mark H.--------- Camking if this is not correct please speak up.
Yes. The two biggest factors in Piston to valve clearance are Duration and Lobe Centelines(I don't like to say LSA, because LSA doesn't tell you where the cam is installed). The lobe lift has a much smaller effect, because occurs so far from TDC
One question that I have is that how many cam lobes in various applications have longer than desired duration to get enough lift and area with acceptable mechanical reliability?
Paradigms often shift without the clutch -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxn-LxwsrnU
https://www.instagram.com/ptuomov/
Put Search Keywords Here
Steve.k
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1562
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 10:41 am
Location:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by Steve.k »

Thanks guys. We have custom pistons already built with popup dome. However switch to different head has little different configuration than previous. So we thought rather than modifying combustion chambers a bit we go flat tops and peel heads down. However with 780 lift and zero deck leaves us with big relief so not gaining much. We will modify heads a smidge get domes to fit and see how she looks.
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by MadBill »

ptuomov wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 7:54 pm...
One question that I have is that how many cam lobes in various applications have longer than desired duration to get enough lift and area with acceptable mechanical reliability?
A friend of mine has a number of BBC-based Batten four valve engines. The later ones have cams with at least 15° more duration than Dynomation thinks is necessary. Apparently with direct-acting buckets the 'too-long' duration was the only way Batten could get the desired lift without the huge contact stresses from cam profiles resembling dunce caps...

Someone here speculated on the possibility of killing low lift flow to band-aid such a situation
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
houser45
Pro
Pro
Posts: 282
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:05 pm
Location:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by houser45 »

With the difference in compression only taking a very small dome? (Guessing 5-9cc. ) i would take the dome with the higher compression option. The torque number would probably be 25-30 ft pounds higher. If you make your dome profile with nice round 1/4” or larger radius it wont lose very much flame travel to the flat top. Prep your pistons. It will pay off
User avatar
ptuomov
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3591
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 3:52 am
Location:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by ptuomov »

MadBill wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 8:43 pm
ptuomov wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 7:54 pm...
One question that I have is that how many cam lobes in various applications have longer than desired duration to get enough lift and area with acceptable mechanical reliability?
A friend of mine has a number of BBC-based Batten four valve engines. The later ones have cams with at least 15° more duration than Dynomation thinks is necessary. Apparently with direct-acting buckets the 'too-long' duration was the only way Batten could get the desired lift without the huge contact stresses from cam profiles resembling dunce caps...

Someone here speculated on the possibility of killing low lift flow to band-aid such a situation
Direct acting bucket lifters limit the maximum valve velocity and the limit depends on the lifter diameter.

If you could reliably kill very low lift flow, that wouldn’t be just a band-aid, it would in my opinion be a solution.
Paradigms often shift without the clutch -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxn-LxwsrnU
https://www.instagram.com/ptuomov/
Put Search Keywords Here
rustbucket79
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2151
Joined: Fri Apr 07, 2006 8:23 pm
Location:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by rustbucket79 »

No mention of the heads used, why?
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by CamKing »

ptuomov wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 7:54 pm
One question that I have is that how many cam lobes in various applications have longer than desired duration to get enough lift and area with acceptable mechanical reliability?
Out of all the cams I sell, none.
That's one of the advantages of being able to machine profiles with inverse radius's.
As for flat follower profiles, you're limited to a maximum velocity, but you're not limited to how quickly you can reach that max velocity, or how long you can stay at it.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
User avatar
Stan Weiss
Vendor
Posts: 4820
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by Stan Weiss »

CamKing wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 9:37 am
ptuomov wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 7:54 pm
One question that I have is that how many cam lobes in various applications have longer than desired duration to get enough lift and area with acceptable mechanical reliability?
Out of all the cams I sell, none.
That's one of the advantages of being able to machine profiles with inverse radius's.
As for flat follower profiles, you're limited to a maximum velocity, but you're not limited to how quickly you can reach that max velocity, or how long you can stay at it.
Mike,
Since that would produce zero acceleration. Would you happen to have a picture of the acceleration graph for one of those cams? I have never seen one like this and it would be interesting to see one.

Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Steve.k
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1562
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 10:41 am
Location:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by Steve.k »

IMG_3608.JPG
rustbucket79 wrote: Sun Apr 28, 2019 11:51 pm No mention of the heads used, why?
The heads are blue thunder 3.6. The original pistons were designed for a3. The spark plug location is in a different location that requires modification to get dome to clear. The pistons i have pretty much mirror cleveland combustion chamber. We thought rather than machine combustion chamber to fit we figured maybe a zero deck flat top get us to our goal. The wallace says 13.5 with flatty. Mid 14 with popup.The pistons are coated didn't want to machine them.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Last edited by Steve.k on Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:41 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by CamKing »

Stan Weiss wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:07 am
Mike,
Since that would produce zero acceleration. Would you happen to have a picture of the acceleration graph for one of those cams? I have never seen one like this and it would be interesting to see one.

Stan
Image
Ignore the blip in the accel curve, after the dwell. That was a measuring error.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
Steve.k
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1562
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 10:41 am
Location:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by Steve.k »

IMG_3613.PNG
The area above spark plug where it comes in has to be relieved to alow part of dome. No big deal i guess it will end up similar to a cleveland combustion chamber
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
Stan Weiss
Vendor
Posts: 4820
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by Stan Weiss »

Mike,
Thanks! Does that have a constant velocity lash ramp?

Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 10717
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 4:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC
Contact:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by CamKing »

Stan Weiss wrote: Mon Apr 29, 2019 10:49 am Mike,
Thanks! Does that have a constant velocity lash ramp?

Stan
Yes. That accel spike you see before the constant Velocity lash ramp, takes place in the first .001" off the base circle. The spike in acceleration you see at the end of the lash ramp is deceiving, because that's the lifter rise with zero lash. In reality, the valve acceleration would not be effected by the constant velocity ramp, because it happens before the lash point.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs

Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
Jones Cam Designs' HotPass Vendors Forum: viewforum.php?f=44
(704)489-2449
Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6386
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: More compression or flat tops

Post by Walter R. Malik »

Steve.k wrote: Sat Apr 27, 2019 11:13 pm Yes i can mill these heads to 55cc easily without a drastic flow change. They are 64 now. So yes thats the answers im looking for. Even with a deep relief and mid 13 compression we maybe further ahead than custom dome to get is up in 14+ area.
Personally, as long as the dome does not hinder flame propagation or cross-flow within the chamber, the dome size shouldn't be an issue.
The problem is that most big domes, do create some kind of hindrance.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.
Post Reply