GARY C wrote: ↑Sat Nov 24, 2018 7:23 pm
The part where you post inconclusive test as absolute fact and then you prove your test inconclusive in post on other builds.
It appears you test in a manner to prove your theory as oppose to trying to find the truth, I don't know if you do it on purpose or just don't realize it.
As best as I can tell from what I have read here your test seem to contradict your statements but it's hard to tell because you don't tell the whole story.
I listen to what I am told but I learn from studying things that go against my preconceived notions... You should try it some time.
It's inconclusive to you becasue you choose not to believe it.
Not everyone agrees with you. I've had several PM me asking more about that test,... and I willingly told them the truth on it.
It ain't the only time I've seen more cfm with more port energy make less power. The last 2 BBC pulling truck engines I did is another example.
The one with more cfm and more pe made less power and tq. It even had 5 more cubes and a bit more compression,... but still a little less power. I know,.. I know. I just didn't get the cam right again. LOL
You clearly haven't been involved in racing engines much.......You should try it some time.
Randy