383 combo in Enginepro

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Raybo
Member
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:09 pm
Location:

383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Raybo »

I’m building a 383 for Chevy truck. I put everything in enginepro and it doesn’t spit out the numbers I expected. I’ve seen several combos discussed here that show better numbers and a lower rpm peak torque number.

.040” 3.75 with 6” rods, intake flow of 260 cfm
248 duration @ .050 HR. cam specs it ask for are limited.
Single plane intake
10.8 CR
770 CFM carb
Shows 421 ft-lbs @ 4700

I need this thing to be streetable and make torque at low rpm with a good torque curve

Any help or advise will be greatly appreciated.
427dart
Expert
Expert
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 3:23 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by 427dart »

IMO a bit big on duration for strong torque down low. Think 230's and an RPM Air Gap intake manifold !
Frankshaft
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1037
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2015 6:01 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Frankshaft »

Raybo wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:08 pm I’m building a 383 for Chevy truck. I put everything in enginepro and it doesn’t spit out the numbers I expected. I’ve seen several combos discussed here that show better numbers and a lower rpm peak torque number.

.040” 3.75 with 6” rods, intake flow of 260 cfm
248 duration @ .050 HR. cam specs it ask for are limited.
Single plane intake
10.8 CR
770 CFM carb
Shows 421 ft-lbs @ 4700

I need this thing to be streetable and make torque at low rpm with a good torque curve

Any help or advise will be greatly appreciated.
If this is for a truck used for daily driver and towing?
Raybo
Member
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:09 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Raybo »

No towing just street driven performance oriented. 2800 stall turbo 350 3:55-3:73 gears
user-30257

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by user-30257 »

Raybo wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:08 pm I’m building a 383 for Chevy truck. I put everything in enginepro and it doesn’t spit out the numbers I expected. I’ve seen several combos discussed here that show better numbers and a lower rpm peak torque number.

.040” 3.75 with 6” rods, intake flow of 260 cfm
248 duration @ .050 HR. cam specs it ask for are limited.
Single plane intake
10.8 CR
770 CFM carb
Shows 421 ft-lbs @ 4700

I need this thing to be streetable and make torque at low rpm with a good torque curve

Any help or advise will be greatly appreciated.
What numbers do you want?
Raybo
Member
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:09 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Raybo »

I’m going to have a custom cam ground but wanted to select the heads now. Looking at Dart aluminum 65cc with 180 runners
user-30257

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by user-30257 »

Raybo wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:49 pm I’m going to have a custom cam ground but wanted to select the heads now. Looking at Dart aluminum 65cc with 180 runners
Go with a 200cc
427dart
Expert
Expert
Posts: 910
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 3:23 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by 427dart »

Build up an LS series engine and call it done!
Raybo
Member
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:09 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Raybo »

Headguy wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:47 pm
Raybo wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:08 pm I’m building a 383 for Chevy truck. I put everything in enginepro and it doesn’t spit out the numbers I expected. I’ve seen several combos discussed here that show better numbers and a lower rpm peak torque number.

.040” 3.75 with 6” rods, intake flow of 260 cfm
248 duration @ .050 HR. cam specs it ask for are limited.
Single plane intake
10.8 CR
770 CFM carb
Shows 421 ft-lbs @ 4700

I need this thing to be streetable and make torque at low rpm with a good torque curve

Any help or advise will be greatly appreciated.
What numbers do you want?
Shooting for 450-475
Raybo
Member
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:09 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Raybo »

Headguy wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:51 pm
Raybo wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 4:49 pm I’m going to have a custom cam ground but wanted to select the heads now. Looking at Dart aluminum 65cc with 180 runners
Go with a 200cc
Ok. I was fearful that could hurt the lower end
Raybo
Member
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:09 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Raybo »

427dart wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:00 pm Build up an LS series engine and call it done!
Already have some of the parts
lefty o
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3445
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:50 am
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by lefty o »

fairly large cam and small head runner is likely where your program is coming up with lowish torque numbers. 195-200cc head and ballpark 235degr cam will likely show you better numbers, and be a bit more pleasant to drive.
Raybo
Member
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:09 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Raybo »

lefty o wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:08 pm fairly large cam and small head runner is likely where your program is coming up with lowish torque numbers. 195-200cc head and ballpark 235degr cam will likely show you better numbers, and be a bit more pleasant to drive.
Ok. Thanks for the help
user-17438

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by user-17438 »

lefty o wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:08 pm fairly large cam and small head runner is likely where your program is coming up with lowish torque numbers. 195-200cc head and ballpark 235degr cam will likely show you better numbers, and be a bit more pleasant to drive.
I was just about to comment pull 10-12 degrees out of the cam and that 200 cc head will make what you are looking for
Raybo
Member
Member
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2016 5:09 pm
Location:

Re: 383 combo in Enginepro

Post by Raybo »

MTENGINES wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:29 pm
lefty o wrote: Mon Oct 15, 2018 5:08 pm fairly large cam and small head runner is likely where your program is coming up with lowish torque numbers. 195-200cc head and ballpark 235degr cam will likely show you better numbers, and be a bit more pleasant to drive.
I was just about to comment pull 10-12 degrees out of the cam and that 200 cc head will make what you are looking for
Awesome. Appreciate the input
Post Reply