Page 3 of 3
Re: Compression Ratio Vs Cylinder Fill
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2018 4:45 pm
by Stan Weiss
Belgian1979 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 2:05 pm
Stan Weiss wrote: ↑Thu Oct 04, 2018 10:54 am
I would be interested if anyone else did these calculations what they come up with.
Bore = 4.155"
Stroke = 3.5"
Rod = 6"
IVC = 76 ABDC (36/76 - 292 seat-to-seat - 110 ICL)
VE = 100%
cylinder pressure around 47.1" hg @ IVC
Stan
What is the projected compression pressure ?
About 407 psi / 828.5" hg
Stan
Re: Compression Ratio Vs Cylinder Fill
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2018 1:08 am
by Mark O'Neal
Caprimaniac wrote: ↑Sat Oct 06, 2018 2:53 am
Mark, you don’t have a video of that engine in the hoist, do you?
Luckily, that was before the cell phone was invented.
Re: Compression Ratio Vs Cylinder Fill
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2018 11:47 am
by swampbuggy
Well dad gum Mark don't leave us wondering-------WHAT happened with the cranked engine on the engine hoist....
Mark H.
Re: Compression Ratio Vs Cylinder Fill
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2018 9:33 pm
by MadBill
I'd guess the torque reaction when the throttle was blipped, or even just when it fired if the throttle was partially open, flipped over the hoist.
