Volumetric Efficiency
Moderator: Team
-
- Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:30 pm
- Location:
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
The blue line waves are from the air rushing down the intake to catch up with the engine on the intake stroke then bouncing back when the intake valve closes. There would be very little difference on a running engine with the blue line.
The yellow pressure reading would be 4 to 5 times higher if it was a running engine and have a totally different shape.
The yellow pressure reading would be 4 to 5 times higher if it was a running engine and have a totally different shape.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
- Location: NC
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
On the glowing headers, does the lean mix burn slow and then continue burning in exhaust? Or ?engineguyBill wrote: ↑Fri Sep 14, 2018 11:12 am You are correct, Stan. Actual VE is a theoretical calculation based on the amount of air ingested into the engine. With correct valve events, the more air going into the engine, the more that will be "trapped" in the cylinder/combustion chamber. I don't believe that it is possible to get a VE of much over 105% without the aid of supercharging, turbocharging, etc.. As far as valve events are concerned, there is a very fine line between closing the exhaust valve at the exact correct time and scavenging intake fluid into the exhaust system.
To answer a question posed in a previous post, very high exhaust temperature (red/glowing headers) can usually be attributed to very lean intake mixture.
A good test is worth a thousand opinions.
Smokey
Smokey
-
- Guru
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
- Location: NC
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
Maybe I'm missing something in your post, but what is the difference in set up between the 2 graphs?Desertrunner wrote: ↑Sat Sep 15, 2018 6:12 am Max VE is all about the correct intake, Diameter (so you get Velocity) and Length ( so you get Mass). When you get inertial to work for you you will get the highest VE. Its not about harmonics at all.
Below are two pressure traces, the blue line is a pressure transducer reading just before the intake valve, the yellow line is the in cylinder pressure transducer. The engine is not firing so we can get a clean trace. Both traces are at the same rpm. If you look down the bottom under the yellow "1" you will see the first has 4.56V the second has 5.74V. The second is 126% of the first so if this was a 500 hp engine the second would 630 hp extra. This is the same cam and lift etc in both traces . As I said the only difference is the design of the intake and using inertia, it is of course a NA engine.
Enjoy,
TEST A 4,000 rpm LS Head No Pipe.jpg
TEST A 4,000 rpm LS Head and 29.5 by 350L.jpg
-
- Guru
- Posts: 9633
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 9:27 am
- Location: Chicago
- Contact:
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
Firedome8 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 9:45 amOn the glowing headers, does the lean mix burn slow and then continue burning in exhaust? Or ?engineguyBill wrote: ↑Fri Sep 14, 2018 11:12 am You are correct, Stan. Actual VE is a theoretical calculation based on the amount of air ingested into the engine. With correct valve events, the more air going into the engine, the more that will be "trapped" in the cylinder/combustion chamber. I don't believe that it is possible to get a VE of much over 105% without the aid of supercharging, turbocharging, etc.. As far as valve events are concerned, there is a very fine line between closing the exhaust valve at the exact correct time and scavenging intake fluid into the exhaust system.
To answer a question posed in a previous post, very high exhaust temperature (red/glowing headers) can usually be attributed to very lean intake mixture.
Glowing headers can result from any of three conditions, all of which result in a LATE (not necessarily slow) burn.
Excessively lean or excessively rich mixture, or retarded timing will result in glowing headers.
Engine misfires are another cause of glowing headers.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4162
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 9:46 pm
- Location: Lund in Sweden
- Contact:
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
Torque will peak when BMEP peaks. Which may, or may not, be when VE peaks. BMEP is IMEP minus FMEP. FMEP losses include pumping losses, accessory losses and also mechanical friction losses.
Erland
Erland
-
- Expert
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:30 pm
- Location: Ontario, Canada
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
Just a note that steel will glow red if heated to egt of a good engine. The color is a result of the time the metal has to heat and the various heat transfers. Sustained load at high power makes a pretty good heat transfer to the headers from the exhaust.
-
- Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:30 pm
- Location:
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
stuffed up
Last edited by Desertrunner on Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:30 pm
- Location:
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
Don't feel to bad it goes over most peoples heads as the data is a lot to understand. At least you are asking.Warp Speed wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:09 amMaybe I'm missing something in your post, but what is the difference in set up between the 2 graphs?Desertrunner wrote: ↑Sat Sep 15, 2018 6:12 am Max VE is all about the correct intake, Diameter (so you get Velocity) and Length ( so you get Mass). When you get inertial to work for you you will get the highest VE. Its not about harmonics at all.
Below are two pressure traces, the blue line is a pressure transducer reading just before the intake valve, the yellow line is the in cylinder pressure transducer. The engine is not firing so we can get a clean trace. Both traces are at the same rpm. If you look down the bottom under the yellow "1" you will see the first has 4.56V the second has 5.74V. The second is 126% of the first so if this was a 500 hp engine the second would 630 hp extra. This is the same cam and lift etc in both traces . As I said the only difference is the design of the intake and using inertia, it is of course a NA engine.
Enjoy,
TEST A 4,000 rpm LS Head No Pipe.jpg
TEST A 4,000 rpm LS Head and 29.5 by 350L.jpg
So the two graphs are of a single cylinder motor driven by a electric motor. The motor is running at 4,000 rpm.
In the head of the motor I have a number of pressure transducers.
One in the combustion chamber,
Second in the intake port of the head just behind the intake valve.
Third not shown in the graph on the exhaust just after the exhaust valve.
So every thing is identical in both graphs except the first has no intake just the head open at the inlet, no manifold nothing.
The second graph has a intake pipe 29.5 mm ID and 350 mm long with a bell on the end.
What the two graphs show very clearly that having a intake pipe you can create inertia which then leads to a higher VE.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:54 pm
- Location: central Florida
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
I would say the same inertia is created by the proper design of an excellent exhaust system, such as a NASCAR CUP SYSTEM. Only difference is it is the back door. Mark H.
-
- Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:30 pm
- Location:
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
Cigar to you Mark,swampbuggy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:43 pm I would say the same inertia is created by the proper design of an excellent exhaust system, such as a NASCAR CUP SYSTEM. Only difference is it is the back door. Mark H.
On a exhaust the pressure waves are a lot higher then with the intake.
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1264
- Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:15 am
- Location: Gold Canyon, AZ
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
i.e. early exhaust valve opening, which enhances "blowdown" which reduces pumping losses and results in higher VE and the resultant maximum horsepower output at high RPM. (in a properly designed/engineered engine combination)Desertrunner wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 10:03 pmCigar to you Mark,swampbuggy wrote: ↑Tue Sep 18, 2018 6:43 pm I would say the same inertia is created by the proper design of an excellent exhaust system, such as a NASCAR CUP SYSTEM. Only difference is it is the back door. Mark H.
On a exhaust the pressure waves are a lot higher then with the intake.
Bill
Perfect Circle Doctor of Motors certification
SAE Member (30 years)
ASE Master Certified Engine Machinist (+ two otherASE Master Certifications)
AERA Certified Professional Engine Machinist
Perfect Circle Doctor of Motors certification
SAE Member (30 years)
ASE Master Certified Engine Machinist (+ two otherASE Master Certifications)
AERA Certified Professional Engine Machinist
-
- Guru
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
- Location: NC
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
I believe we are mistaking pressure waves and inertia as being the same.......?
-
- Member
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:30 pm
- Location:
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
I know exactly what is going on there is no confusion. But you have reminded me why I hate forums so much so I will spare you any more comments from me as I shouldn't have wasted my time posting the R&D data. I thought people might learn something but I was wrong.Warp Speed wrote: ↑Wed Sep 19, 2018 5:23 am I believe we are mistaking pressure waves and inertia as being the same.......?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 3285
- Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:46 pm
- Location: NC
Re: Volumetric Efficiency
Didn't mean to get your feathers in a ruffle that's for sure, but not really sure what I said that warranted that response. Was I supposed to just say "ooh, awww, wow, amazing"?Desertrunner wrote: ↑Wed Sep 19, 2018 9:58 amI know exactly what is going on there is no confusion. But you have reminded me why I hate forums so much so I will spare you any more comments from me as I shouldn't have wasted my time posting the R&D data. I thought people might learn something but I was wrong.Warp Speed wrote: ↑Wed Sep 19, 2018 5:23 am I believe we are mistaking pressure waves and inertia as being the same.......?
I do a little of this type of testing myself, and was just trying to get your meaning clearified.
Sorry.......