Mark O'Neal
Perhaps. But you'd never know it if you ran them.
[/quote]
well , as you put it........"perhaps" , but I'm not going to take that chance considering all that's required to assemble AND install an engine.
PERHAPS , JE should indicate on the instruction / info sheet that the inconsistency of the top ring bevel is "inconsequential."
BTW , ring groove depth was sufficient to accept a Speed Pro set.........the JE top ring radial at .187ish and SP at .195ish. I doubt the increased back clearance of the JE was supposed to "offset" the reduced inconsistent bevel. I still maintain poor quality control for rings MADE IN USA. You can get lackadaisical people here just as easily as you can anywhere else.
[/quote]
1> I wasn't suggesting you do anything. I said the difference would not be measureable.....in a lackadaisical way.....
2> ring depths, until recently, were just cut to "D WALL" dimensions and builders dealt with it from there. (Bore size/22 +.005)
3> 99% of engine building is opinion.
4> I am a happy guy. I'm happy because I am selective about when I sit about picking pepper out of fly poop.