A lot of good info there that is often overlooked.David Redszus wrote: ↑Fri Mar 23, 2018 11:39 am Over the years we have seen a number of fueling options.
1. An engine designed for carbs using carbs.
2. An engine designed for carbs using some form of fuel injection.
3. An engine designed for fuel injection using fuel injection.
4. An engine designed for fuel injection using carbs.
Option #3 will win every time, all other things being equal; which they seldom are.
Just as all carbs are not the same, neither are all fuel injection systems.
We started using timed port fuel injection sprayed at 450-500 psi, over 45 years ago.
No carb could come close with regard to performance. However, the best carbs at the time
(Webers) could be easily adjusted while the injection system was much more difficult to tune.
But once properly tuned it was no contest. Every factory prepared race car of the era switched to FI.
But not all FI systems are equal in performance. Part of the problem is system design and part is
due to installation error.
Today, we still have low pressure EFI systems that are often improperly mapped, coupled to an ineffective
induction system and questionable ignition mapping. A throttle body system with injectors can't really be
considered close to state of the art.
Injectors that squirt like a fire hose, rather than spray a fine fog are sub-optimal. Mixture quality
is just as important as mixture quantity. Fuel evaporative cooling that chills the inlet manifold
rather than increasing inlet air density is also sub-optimal.
In short, buzz words do not reflect the true performance potential of either type system.
Simply bolting on new hardware does not ensure improved performance. Like every other system
on a race car, it must be carefully, and sometimes painfully, optimized.
I found it interesting that even on the factory GM throttle body set up you could get both performance and economy increase by adding 2 or 3 psi and a cpl of degrees of timing.