Carb spacer recommendation
Moderator: Team
Carb spacer recommendation
383... 13.5 on alky... 7200 rpms... rules say open spacer only but I'm not opposed to trying a four hole so... Do I go cheap? Fancy? HVH or off brand? Plastic, phenolic, wood or aluminum?
Honored to be a member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame Class of 2019
-
- Guru
- Posts: 8706
- Joined: Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:16 pm
- Location: Victoria BC Canada
Re: Carb spacer recommendation
We have been having good success with the HVH spacer line. Particularly the tapered and blended type.
Funny this is that on some combo's we have tested they perform much better up side down which has a base with 4 holes that are blended and tapered into an open side facing up.
I would have to find a party number but they do have some of the best spacers we have used.
There are other notable designs and styles that are for lack of a better way to say this "generic" copies again that showed improvements over the HVH model's.
The intake itself can differ from part to part in the same line out of the box no mods and others that had the full meal deal performed had different results.
I guess what I am saying is working with a specific combo you will ring out every pony in a specific rules engine where part numbers must be used but with all the options for heads post sizes etc available today you just have to test and test some more till you get everything you can from a combo which can be tough without a dyno to do it.
But time slips can also point you in the right direction as well as there are no hard fast rules that you use this spacer with this intake and thats as good as it gets kind of deal
Funny this is that on some combo's we have tested they perform much better up side down which has a base with 4 holes that are blended and tapered into an open side facing up.
I would have to find a party number but they do have some of the best spacers we have used.
There are other notable designs and styles that are for lack of a better way to say this "generic" copies again that showed improvements over the HVH model's.
The intake itself can differ from part to part in the same line out of the box no mods and others that had the full meal deal performed had different results.
I guess what I am saying is working with a specific combo you will ring out every pony in a specific rules engine where part numbers must be used but with all the options for heads post sizes etc available today you just have to test and test some more till you get everything you can from a combo which can be tough without a dyno to do it.
But time slips can also point you in the right direction as well as there are no hard fast rules that you use this spacer with this intake and thats as good as it gets kind of deal
Real Race Cars Don't Have Doors
Re: Carb spacer recommendation
I agree there Pro Power... I hope to book a 1/2 day of dyno time when I'm ready.
I like those super suckers but I've seen some generics have good results too. I guess I'll see if I can pickup a couple cheap ones and maybe find an hvh on the used market so I can compare them.
I like those super suckers but I've seen some generics have good results too. I guess I'll see if I can pickup a couple cheap ones and maybe find an hvh on the used market so I can compare them.
Honored to be a member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame Class of 2019
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4604
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: Carb spacer recommendation
The sheer plate type never fails to add power and never hurt provided it's on a single plane Manifold.
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Re: Carb spacer recommendation
Single plane...
Rules limit the manifold to 7 1/2 inches from the bottom of the plenum (outside I think) to the carb base. Mine is about 4 1/2 inches... anyone seen an advantage to going three inches high with a spacer?
Honored to be a member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame Class of 2019
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1597
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 11:58 pm
- Location: tenn
Re: Carb spacer recommendation
We had one engine that we had 4 inches of spacer. ! inche 4 hole and 3 inches of open. Made more tq but hp was minimal. But in car didnt run as well and had to go back to 2 in. Had a tendency to back fire.
reed
reed
Re: Carb spacer recommendation
Funny how that stuff works...racear2865 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:32 am We had one engine that we had 4 inches of spacer. ! inche 4 hole and 3 inches of open. Made more tq but hp was minimal. But in car didnt run as well and had to go back to 2 in. Had a tendency to back fire.
reed
Honored to be a member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame Class of 2019
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1575
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2011 8:54 pm
- Location: central Florida
Re: Carb spacer recommendation
Krooser, i bet the rules are meaning 7.5 inches from the China rail up to the gasket surface ??? Mark H.
Re: Carb spacer recommendation
You're right...it's a Wissota rule that also applies for the Dirt Kings Tour. My local track reverts to the Wissota deal too.swampbuggy wrote: ↑Sat Jan 20, 2018 9:04 pm Krooser, i bet the rules are meaning 7.5 inches from the China rail up to the gasket surface ??? Mark H.
It's 7 1/4"... valve galley rail to base of carb. Looks like a 2" spacer is what I need.
Thanks... I missed that.
Honored to be a member of the Luxemburg Speedway Hall of Fame Class of 2019