Autopart101 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:24 pm
I also have a Holley 950. I may use it if the 1050 is too much. I like the 2828 over the SV. I have both. Yes there is a lot of plenum work to be done in the 2828. My goal is to make 650+ FWHP.
I feel Mark may be right above to point out that the heads were most limiting on your previous combo. Shafiroff says they'll send you a dyno sheet with the linked engine (427W) showing 630FWHP on a combo that is essentially your old setup with the addition of AFR220's (and open header exhaust we'll assume.) Their cam is only slightly larger than your old cam.
That'a about where we usually ended up in that cubic inch range, with smaller hydraulic rollers. I have a couple of CHP Dyno videos posted.
Here's a 427 - 10.5: - smaller 205 heads - and a .600 lift H/R cam. 602 H/P 587 Torque.
Autopart101 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 07, 2018 3:24 pm
I also have a Holley 950. I may use it if the 1050 is too much. I like the 2828 over the SV. I have both. Yes there is a lot of plenum work to be done in the 2828. My goal is to make 650+ FWHP.
I feel Mark may be right above to point out that the heads were most limiting on your previous combo. Shafiroff says they'll send you a dyno sheet with the linked engine (427W) showing 630FWHP on a combo that is essentially your old setup with the addition of AFR220's (and open header exhaust we'll assume.) Their cam is only slightly larger than your old cam.
Yes the Vic jrs are the weak point. The SV would work just fine. I just think the 2828 will do well on this size Windsor.
I'd have considered one if I thought it would fit under my flat hood.
Is this a super vic or jr? I've got one going on the dyno next Wednesday, pump gas, same heads, solid roller, super vic with hermaphrodite Holley/FAST EFI.
Is this a super vic or jr? I've got one going on the dyno next Wednesday, pump gas, same heads, solid roller, super vic with hermaphrodite Holley/FAST EFI.
