Mid lift rockers

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

kimosabi
Member
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:01 pm

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby kimosabi » Mon Sep 04, 2017 6:11 am

Paul Kane, one of the politicians on this board. If the facts don't fit, you make them fit. Especially if you have an agenda.

"kim, you are now arguing how the roller wheel is positioned atop the valve, not where the roller wheel is positioned atop the valve."

So now you're saying that when you twist the rocker it doesn't move the position on top of the valve stem.... Ok, we're done here.

Since you're into Miller rockers so much, why don't you adress my remarks on Millers quality issues? They are easily searched on google.

Walter R. Malik
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3294
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2012 10:15 am
Location: Roseville, Michigan (just north of Detroit)
Contact:

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby Walter R. Malik » Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:24 am

kimosabi wrote:Paul Kane, one of the politicians on this board. If the facts don't fit, you make them fit. Especially if you have an agenda.

"kim, you are now arguing how the roller wheel is positioned atop the valve, not where the roller wheel is positioned atop the valve."

So now you're saying that when you twist the rocker it doesn't move the position on top of the valve stem.... Ok, we're done here.

Since you're into Miller rockers so much, why don't you adress my remarks on Millers quality issues? They are easily searched on google.


Give it a rest.

Almost everyone reading this knows that he was talking about the inside/outside contact roll pattern; (with the rocker arm being aligned correctly to the valve).
If not ... of course there are all sorts of other variables introduced. That is no longer a rocker arm issue.
http://www.rmcompetition.com
Specialty engine building at its finest.

MasterUMC
Member
Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon May 26, 2014 5:18 pm

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby MasterUMC » Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:36 am

I've used the miller PVS stud mount rockers on a SBF for several years now, very happy with them. 8000 rpm 302 based, mid 5's in the 1/8. The mid-lift theory worked out very well, cam lobe info transfers to the valve tip accurately.

Paul Kane
Member
Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:49 am
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Contact:

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby Paul Kane » Mon Sep 04, 2017 8:47 am

kimosabi wrote:So now you're saying that when you twist the rocker it doesn't move the position on top of the valve stem....
kim you are not looking at the roller wheel's relation to the valve stem, instead you're moving the entire rocker arm in relation to the valve train. You're completely changing the setup. Fine, go ahead if you want. You may position the rocker arm however you wish for the sake of example, just let the roller wheel fall wherever it may atop the valve stem and don't worry whether it's inboard, outboard, dead center, etc, because the roller wheel's position atop has nothing to with your final geometry setup. And that's true whether your rocker arm is installed straight, pidgeon-toed, inline valve train or compound valve angles such as in a canted valve head. I've tried numerous ways now to explain this to you, sorry you don't comprehend it. I'm not going to spend any more time explaining--there are plenty of examples in this thread that you may re-read if you want.



kimosabi wrote:Since you're into Miller rockers so much, why don't you adress my remarks on Millers quality issues? They are easily searched on google.
kim, use a little rationale: Every rocker arm manufacturer has a history of failed rocker arms. You are less likely to see the history of broken Crane rockers (for example) on a google search because millions of Crane rockers have been sold and so the links about broken Cranes are buried amongst near-endless pages of links discussing Crane rockers. Incidentally, most broken rocker arms--regardless of brand--"failed" because something else failed in the engine and took the rocker arm out along the way, or user error. A rocker arm breaking entire unto itself is the lowest percentage of occurrence, and that's certainly true about Millers as much as any other brand.

I'll be moving along now.
We're On The Web; Click Below:
High Flow Dynamics
Performance Components for the 429/460 Engine Family


View our eBay auctions: click HERE.

Steve.k
Pro
Pro
Posts: 261
Joined: Sat May 28, 2016 9:41 am

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby Steve.k » Mon Sep 04, 2017 10:14 am

Well reguardless they are going on Trackboss #1. I'll keep you posted with developments!!

engineguyBill
Expert
Expert
Posts: 689
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:15 am
Location: Gold Canyon, AZ

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby engineguyBill » Mon Sep 04, 2017 4:50 pm

kimosabi wrote:
I'll be moving along now.



Thank God! My head hurts.
Bill

SAE Member (25+ years)
ASE Master Certified Engine Machinist
AERA Certified Professional Engine Machinist

"Do what you can, with what you have, where you are."
- Theodore Roosevelt

kimosabi
Member
Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Feb 22, 2014 5:01 pm

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby kimosabi » Tue Sep 05, 2017 2:26 am

Walter R. Malik wrote:
kimosabi wrote:Paul Kane, one of the politicians on this board. If the facts don't fit, you make them fit. Especially if you have an agenda.

"kim, you are now arguing how the roller wheel is positioned atop the valve, not where the roller wheel is positioned atop the valve."

So now you're saying that when you twist the rocker it doesn't move the position on top of the valve stem.... Ok, we're done here.

Since you're into Miller rockers so much, why don't you adress my remarks on Millers quality issues? They are easily searched on google.


Give it a rest.

Almost everyone reading this knows that he was talking about the inside/outside contact roll pattern; (with the rocker arm being aligned correctly to the valve).
If not ... of course there are all sorts of other variables introduced. That is no longer a rocker arm issue.


Yeah I'll give it a rest. What I have been trying to do is to help Paul Kane understand that geometry applies one way or the other. It always does. Blunt statements like "geometry does not involve roller tip placement on the valvestem" is only half correct.

Anyhoo, good luck and have fun with your build OP! If you have a shelf roller rocker and compare it to the Miller rocker and post a pic of the two would be cool.

midnightbluS10
Member
Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Sun Oct 20, 2013 7:41 am

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby midnightbluS10 » Sat Sep 09, 2017 2:18 am

Wow. Amazing that people still employ the 'if I don't understand, it must be wrong" attitude. Smh.

treyrags
Pro
Pro
Posts: 283
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:33 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby treyrags » Sat Sep 09, 2017 5:50 am

midnightbluS10 wrote:Wow. Amazing that people still employ the 'if I don't understand, it must be wrong" attitude. Smh.


:lol:
Image

mdengine
New Member
New Member
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:06 am

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby mdengine » Sun Sep 10, 2017 4:04 pm

I used ONE set of 1.6 SBC rockers. I thought this was a great idea I have always struggled with rocker are geometry. Five passes (1/8 mile drag) the engine dropped a valve, the pin that holds roller on came out. After inspection the pins had moved on five other rockers. I called Miller he told me " I thought I had that problem fixed" well short story I fix the customer's engine on my dime. I would not use them.

Racerrick
Expert
Expert
Posts: 673
Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 9:52 am

Re: Mid lift rockers

Postby Racerrick » Sun Sep 10, 2017 9:54 pm

mdengine wrote:I used ONE set of 1.6 SBC rockers. I thought this was a great idea I have always struggled with rocker are geometry. Five passes (1/8 mile drag) the engine dropped a valve, the pin that holds roller on came out. After inspection the pins had moved on five other rockers. I called Miller he told me " I thought I had that problem fixed" well short story I fix the customer's engine on my dime. I would not use them.
Agreed they do seem to have a history of failure. Internet searching reveals multiple rocker failures for every part of the rocker. I have little time or money to waste so I will continue to use a steel stud mount rocker from Comp or Crower over any aluminum rocker arm.


Return to “Engine Tech”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 1972ho, Bing [Bot], britjunk, Fireonthemountain, hoodeng, In-Tech, Roundybout, vds and 48 guests