stock 383 mopar
Moderator: Team
Re: stock 383 mopar
How would a 650 cfm Demon make less power than a 650 cfm AFB if Both carbs have been tuned to deliver the appropriate mixture? I can't see how throwing more parts at this is the right way to "fix" it?
Re: stock 383 mopar
Just ordered parts. It was a 750 demon carb BTW after he brought me the box. Edelbrock performer 2186,
Cam is 107 LSA
Duration @ .006 279-296
Duration @ .050 227-241
Lift .486-.473
ICL 102
My understanding is the exhaust valve is undersized a little in these early 383's so the reasoning for the long exhaust lobe.
Discussed two different options on the camshaft and the customer wanted the loopier idle.
Next question is exhaust; I have been advised to use some 440 Magnum C body exhaust Manifolds they are supposed to be much better than the logs that are bolted up now.
Does anyone have an opinion on if there is a significant enough improvement to justify changing them?
Cam is 107 LSA
Duration @ .006 279-296
Duration @ .050 227-241
Lift .486-.473
ICL 102
My understanding is the exhaust valve is undersized a little in these early 383's so the reasoning for the long exhaust lobe.
Discussed two different options on the camshaft and the customer wanted the loopier idle.
I don't deal with PITA customers I usually weed them out before I turn a bolt lol. But this is a returning customer for the third time no problem anticipatedwwmtlineman wrote:This is going to be a guy you arent going to make happy, proceed at your own risk
Next question is exhaust; I have been advised to use some 440 Magnum C body exhaust Manifolds they are supposed to be much better than the logs that are bolted up now.
Does anyone have an opinion on if there is a significant enough improvement to justify changing them?
-
- Guru
- Posts: 1508
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2016 1:17 am
- Location:
Re: stock 383 mopar
gvx wrote:Just ordered parts. It was a 750 demon carb BTW after he brought me the box. Edelbrock performer 2186,
Cam is 107 LSA
Duration @ .006 279-296
Duration @ .050 227-241
Lift .486-.473
ICL 102
My understanding is the exhaust valve is undersized a little in these early 383's so the reasoning for the long exhaust lobe.
Discussed two different options on the camshaft and the customer wanted the loopier idle.
I don't deal with PITA customers I usually weed them out before I turn a bolt lol. But this is a returning customer for the third time no problem anticipatedwwmtlineman wrote:This is going to be a guy you arent going to make happy, proceed at your own risk
Next question is exhaust; I have been advised to use some 440 Magnum C body exhaust Manifolds they are supposed to be much better than the logs that are bolted up now.
Does anyone have an opinion on if there is a significant enough improvement to justify changing them?
Whose cam is that? I can't thing of a single reason to run that much exhaust timing with a 107 LSA. Just seems wrong to me.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2012 5:56 am
- Location:
Re: stock 383 mopar
In my limited experience, all the cast manifolds perform basically similar, with the exception of the max wedge stuff. If he wants some noise, perhaps sell him some headers? The 66 383 should be 516 heads, which normally had 1.6 exhaust valves, and were generally "meh" for performance. The Eddie Performer is nice just from the standpoint of losing weight. S/F....Ken M
Re: stock 383 mopar
Classic case of mission creep.
Have Daytona Carb rebuild the Carter. Have a distributor shop rebuild his distributor. Put it back stock and leave well enough alone.
Have Daytona Carb rebuild the Carter. Have a distributor shop rebuild his distributor. Put it back stock and leave well enough alone.
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
Re: stock 383 mopar
X3V Remian wrote:This gets my vote. I think TQ's are the most underrated carbs.mag2555 wrote:The base Edelbrock performer Intake with a good rebuilt Theroquad will provide better drivability then the stock set up and also better top end power!
For any low deck of high deck Mopar with stock heads and shifting at 5500 it does not get any better then this!
" If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space."
Re: stock 383 mopar
I'll talk to David today about this spec'in a couple different options on the camshaft for me. I brought up the thumpr cam because the customer wanted the usability of the low RPMs but he wanted the engine to sound a lil more radical. This seemed like a good compromise the intake lobe was spot on for what we all wanted out of the engine although David didn't like the exhaust side being so long. But after David work the numbers up we were only sacrificing about 20 horsepower so considering this is not competition Racing Engine the customer was willing to make the sacrifice to get the idle sound he wanted.statsystems wrote:
Whose cam is that? I can't thing of a single reason to run that much exhaust timing with a 107 LSA. Just seems wrong to me.
Re: stock 383 mopar
Yeah, the 'Thumper cam', misnamed, should be the 'Crapper cam'......Those cams are for image, not performance.
The extra exh duration will kill off what little low end tq the 383 has, but it will 'sound' great. Sadly, performance will not match the sound......
The extra exh duration will kill off what little low end tq the 383 has, but it will 'sound' great. Sadly, performance will not match the sound......
-
- Guru
- Posts: 4607
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 11:31 am
- Location: Heading for a bang up with Andromeda as we all are.
Re: stock 383 mopar
That small Exh valve in those 516 heads demands headers if you or your customer demands to see HP numbers peak above 4500!
In fact I would sooner run Headers then a Cam with more Exh duration, I would take full advantage of that big lifter and have comp Cams or someone grind you up a Exh lobe with at least .030" more lift then your running on the Intake side and with a faster opening ramp!
In fact I would sooner run Headers then a Cam with more Exh duration, I would take full advantage of that big lifter and have comp Cams or someone grind you up a Exh lobe with at least .030" more lift then your running on the Intake side and with a faster opening ramp!
You can cut a man's tongue from his mouth, but that does not mean he’s a liar, it just shows that you fear the truth he might speak about you!
Re: stock 383 mopar
but isn't this engines more limited on the amount of lift. I'm not sure where to stop at but I know you don't want to go crazy on the lift with stock pistons? How much over .500 would you feel safe?mag2555 wrote:That small Exh valve in those 516 heads demands headers if you or your customer demands to see HP numbers peak above 4500!
In fact I would sooner run Headers then a Cam with more Exh duration, I would take full advantage of that big lifter and have comp Cams or someone grind you up a Exh lobe with at least .030" more lift then your running on the Intake side and with a faster opening ramp!
Re: stock 383 mopar
Would burn a single in first to about 70 mph and upshift 2nd to 3rd at about 100 mph. Instantly addicted to the high rpm sound. For this project I would rebuild the worn out parts, headers and nice dual exhaust, gears and a posi. Done. Those heads will need upgraded springs with that cam and I am sure will also need guides and a valve job. Thanks, Charlie
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Servedio Cylinder Head Development
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
Re: stock 383 mopar
wonder if steve dulcich lurks here sure he'd know the perfect setup
love those barges and the sound of a bbm winding up
no say on the thumpr and demon hope hes happy he has to understand it will never feel the same as teh carter
remember as a teen a boss I had rebuilding tquads al the time. Big goofy looking piece but they sure worked wel
he had a pile literally 3 f high and 5 ft diameter of holleys...knew back then I shoulda kept them all went to the junkman.
love those barges and the sound of a bbm winding up
no say on the thumpr and demon hope hes happy he has to understand it will never feel the same as teh carter
remember as a teen a boss I had rebuilding tquads al the time. Big goofy looking piece but they sure worked wel
he had a pile literally 3 f high and 5 ft diameter of holleys...knew back then I shoulda kept them all went to the junkman.
Re: stock 383 mopar
FWIW- 1966 Coronet engine I did. Could use a converter but he still has the stock unit, 3.23 gear.
516 Heads, Howards HR & Morel Lifters, Performer intake with 650cfm Edelbrock.
Test: CP Motorworks chrysler 3837
STP J-607 Corrected Power
Range: 3100 RPM - 5500 RPM
EngSpd: 4300 RPM
STPPwr: 320.6 CHp
STPTrq: 393.5 Clb-ft
AFR : 13.4 Ratio
CoolOt: 164 deg F
Oil_P : 69.4 0-150p
OilOut: 83 deg F
AirSum: 425 SCFM
375hp @ 5500, 409lbs @ 3800 with 36 degrees thru B body manifolds with 2.5" pipes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVC4Cwv ... 2&index=13
516 Heads, Howards HR & Morel Lifters, Performer intake with 650cfm Edelbrock.
Test: CP Motorworks chrysler 3837
STP J-607 Corrected Power
Range: 3100 RPM - 5500 RPM
EngSpd: 4300 RPM
STPPwr: 320.6 CHp
STPTrq: 393.5 Clb-ft
AFR : 13.4 Ratio
CoolOt: 164 deg F
Oil_P : 69.4 0-150p
OilOut: 83 deg F
AirSum: 425 SCFM
375hp @ 5500, 409lbs @ 3800 with 36 degrees thru B body manifolds with 2.5" pipes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oVC4Cwv ... 2&index=13
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Pete Graves
CPMotorworks,Inc.
Custom Engine Machining
Cylinder Head Fixture for Vertical / Surfacing Mills since 2008
CPMotorworks,Inc.
Custom Engine Machining
Cylinder Head Fixture for Vertical / Surfacing Mills since 2008