3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Post Reply
redliner
Expert
Expert
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:07 pm
Location:

3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by redliner »

Dart block,3.875 x 4.125 bore sbc for my 3200lbs. coupe. lookin to make 600 h.p. on pumpgas. Is a 6" rod the way to go? Over simplified question but can elaborate if need be to get a good answer.... Thanks....
lefty o
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3445
Joined: Tue Oct 15, 2013 8:50 am
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by lefty o »

i thin a 6" would be fine. but get the crank, call and talk to a piston mfgr and go from there.
wyrmrider
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:52 pm
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by wyrmrider »

very popular combination
pick your pistons and rods before spending cash
lighter piston (than with 5.7 rod) is easier to balance and keeps the piston from coming out the bottom of the block
that said
if you can find a shelf combination or a shelf piston for a longer rod use it with the longer rod 6 1/8 6 1/4 whatever depending on your application, longevity vs rpm band- which we do not know- etc
we built lots of motors with 4" strokes and 6" rods
pick a rod that will easily clear cam
does the dart block have a raised cam, big ca, tunnel, larger lifter bores by any chance
roller cam or FT? ours were roller but I have done FT
smaller base circle on ft leads to pointy noses- not good with any rpm or spring pressure
on a roller if using a smaller base circle a design for a Buick base circle should be used as chevy base circle on small base circle billet is nowhere near optimum and gives more side thrust so you have to use a milder grind- BVVC
Mike Jones is go to for Buick Base Circles - I think his Buick Indy engines used them- but It's been awhile
englertracing
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1547
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 8:55 am
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by englertracing »

That's what sprint cars run.
Mostly.

Ones with enormous all pro heads use shorter 5.9" rods
Older smaller heads use 6" rods.

So are you using smallish heads or biggish heads?


TBH I'd be tempted to go for 6.125"
redliner
Expert
Expert
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:07 pm
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by redliner »

lefty o wrote:i thin a 6" would be fine. but get the crank, call and talk to a piston mfgr and go from there.
Thanks Lefty!
redliner
Expert
Expert
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:07 pm
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by redliner »

wyrmrider wrote:very popular combination
pick your pistons and rods before spending cash
lighter piston (than with 5.7 rod) is easier to balance and keeps the piston from coming out the bottom of the block
that said
if you can find a shelf combination or a shelf piston for a longer rod use it with the longer rod 6 1/8 6 1/4 whatever depending on your application, longevity vs rpm band- which we do not know- etc
we built lots of motors with 4" strokes and 6" rods
pick a rod that will easily clear cam
does the dart block have a raised cam, big ca, tunnel, larger lifter bores by any chance
roller cam or FT? ours were roller but I have done FT
smaller base circle on ft leads to pointy noses- not good with any rpm or spring pressure
on a roller if using a smaller base circle a design for a Buick base circle should be used as chevy base circle on small base circle billet is nowhere near optimum and gives more side thrust so you have to use a milder grind- BVVC
Mike Jones is go to for Buick Base Circles - I think his Buick Indy engines used them- but It's been awhile
The car is street / strip, solid roller ( .700 ish lift) Rpm range is 7500 max.I was going to go with the SHP block which doesnt have the raised cam tunnel. Thanks for the heads up on alll this info! I was planning to talk to Mike about a cam. I will mention the Buick base circle. Very interesting!!!
redliner
Expert
Expert
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:07 pm
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by redliner »

englertracing wrote:That's what sprint cars run.
Mostly.

Ones with enormous all pro heads use shorter 5.9" rods
Older smaller heads use 6" rods.

So are you using smallish heads or biggish heads?


TBH I'd be tempted to go for 6.125"
Thanks Englertracing! I plan on using Speier Racing Heads Profier V2.50PF/23* which are 227 cc, 2.53 csa,323@.700
RevTheory
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5646
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 6:45 am
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by RevTheory »

redliner
Expert
Expert
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:07 pm
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by redliner »

RevTheory wrote:Check this article out- http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/engine ... all-block/
Thanks! Very good article!!!
77cruiser
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Dec 29, 2006 10:32 pm
Location: I Falls MN
Contact:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by 77cruiser »

That's what I used in mine 6" Scat Procomp rod Scat forged crank. I'm only at 530 hp but it has a small cam.
Jim
rfoll
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3027
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 12:44 pm
Location: St. Helens, OR

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by rfoll »

With this kind of build the parts are not going to be inexpensive junk. There is not going to be cost differences between the rods and pistons for each connecting rod choice. It is more likely the 6 inch combo will be more common due to the increased stroke, and the assembly will balance internally. In my 415 I have 6" Compstar H beams, and 4 needed to be clearanced slightly for my standard base circle .640" lift cam.
So much to do, so little time...
steve316
Expert
Expert
Posts: 630
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 10:06 pm
Location: St.Joseph,mo.

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by steve316 »

Run small journal crank and compstar rods and you can run standard base circle cam. You will have a little over .045 rod to cam clearance.
redliner
Expert
Expert
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:07 pm
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by redliner »

steve316 wrote:Run small journal crank and compstar rods and you can run standard base circle cam. You will have a little over .045 rod to cam clearance.
Im lookin at .700 lift. Small journal, meaning 350 mains?
wyrmrider
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:52 pm
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by wyrmrider »

Honda rod journal or 283 methinks he meant
do that or get the raised big cam tunnel
the bigger the base circle the better for lots of reasons
redliner
Expert
Expert
Posts: 777
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 4:07 pm
Location:

Re: 3.875 x 4.125 sbc, do I want a 6" rod?

Post by redliner »

wyrmrider wrote:Honda rod journal or 283 methinks he meant
do that or get the raised big cam tunnel
the bigger the base circle the better for lots of reasons
I was thinkin SHP block which has standard cam location but can be upgraded to bigger tunnel and .904 lifters at a later date. I am lucky if i get the combo built I have in mind... I must draw the line somewhere....
Post Reply