Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

tjs44
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 747
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:30 pm
Location: long beach.ca

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by tjs44 »

The cam that really gets a lot use is the RA IV with rhodes lifters.I just never liked them.I have found the hyd roller cams to my liking and no breakin issue with FT lifters.Way more money though.Tom
GARY C
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm
Location:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by GARY C »

pmd400 wrote:How would 276/268 adv. 233/227 at .050, .504/.489 lift with 1.5 rockers lunati voodoo sound.
I'm thinking 106lsa ground on a 102icl
I personally would not go negative on the exhaust unless I was going to dyno test it against something else. If it was me I would go with the 268 lobe on a 106 in at a 102, keep in mind that your 1.65 rocker will effectively add about 2 to 2.5 degrees to your .050 numbers.

I tend to er on the moderate side for a street cam, if it's a little small you might loose a little hp at the top of the rpm range but if it's to big you risk loosing both tq and hp everywhere except for the top part of the rpm range.
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
pmd400
New Member
New Member
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2016 9:34 pm
Location:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by pmd400 »

How about for the intake use an comp xe, 274 at 0.006, 230 at .050, .325 tappet lift.
Exhaust using comp magnum, 276 at .006, 226 at 050, .309 tappet lift.
According to comp both lobe families are asymmetrical. The xe is much steeper on the opening then closing ramp while the magnum is much closer to being equal
wyrmrider
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:52 pm
Location:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by wyrmrider »

go back and reread the OP's first post
240 or 270 gear
under 5500 rpm
what makes you think a 230 degree cam would be any fun?
GARY C
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm
Location:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by GARY C »

pmd400 wrote:How about for the intake use an comp xe, 274 at 0.006, 230 at .050, .325 tappet lift.
Exhaust using comp magnum, 276 at .006, 226 at 050, .309 tappet lift.
According to comp both lobe families are asymmetrical. The xe is much steeper on the opening then closing ramp while the magnum is much closer to being equal
I like that one, fast intake with slow exhaust. It may be worth while to pay a little extra for the treated core...I never have but everyone says it's good insurance. I did groove my lifter bores on my Pontiac with Comps grooving tool, I don't know how much it helps but I did it anyway.
I ran a Comps XE 284/240 in a 9.5:1 468 BBC in my 77 T/A with a set of well worked over oval ports a performer rpm with an old holley 800 dp I wished I had chose the 274 because the 284 was a bit much at idle due to a very tight 11" converter only 1000 over stock stall but it was stupid fast even with a 3.08 gear and a 295-50-15-tire it was traction limited even rolling at a good pace.
MAKE SURE! you have sub frame connectors! I have seen guys twist these cars bad enough that the door will not close, also as well as a quality slapper bar like Competition Engineering or Cal Tracks. Big Block tq will find any weak links. :D
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
Geoff2
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1985
Joined: Mon Nov 09, 2015 4:36 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by Geoff2 »

Yes, Pontiac 14* heads have a 135* sweeping bend in the exh port. I do not see this as being so bad... Whether by accident or design, it positions the exh port exit interface with headers at a less sharp/more favourable angle. Compare the Pontiac port to Mopar Wedge, SBC exh ports, that have upward pointing exh port exits & a sharper angle entering the header.
Keith Morganstein
Guru
Guru
Posts: 5566
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:19 am
Location: MA

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by Keith Morganstein »

I don't have the cam card in front of me.
Mike Jones (jones cams) made me Hyd roller cams that has worked well in pontiac street applications.

It's around 226/226, 525/525 on 108 or 110. Different lobes int and exhaust. I think you would be happy with that.

Your not going to do as well picking and choosing lobes as working with the cam designer. I would avoid comp, esp a flat Hyd or street roller. Much better off working with Mike jones (or Chris Straub etc...) for a little more, you'll get something made for you and good quality.
Automotive Machining, cylinder head rebuilding, engine building. Can't seem to quit #-o
tjs44
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 747
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:30 pm
Location: long beach.ca

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by tjs44 »

The only reason is I have driven a lot of 455s with 230s duration.The long arm likes them.The 3 3/4 stroke 400s dont.Tom
Kenny M
Member
Member
Posts: 82
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2013 12:31 pm
Location:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by Kenny M »

Looks to me like you want a cost effective camshaft. I have had great tire blowing,very strong pull to 5500 on 455 9 to 1 motors with these two camshafts. Ether one will more than fit your engine combo and make you smile without hurting your wallet.
Crower 60916 278-289-221-229 460 470 112 in @108
Summit 2802 282-292-224-234 470 490 114 in @ 109

Pontiac/Olds/Buicks.. My personal experience with OEM Heads.. Wider seat Duration and Wider Center has given me the best results. Plus they don't rattle like a sold roller:)

Kenny
GARY C
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 6302
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 10:58 pm
Location:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by GARY C »

Kenny M wrote:Looks to me like you want a cost effective camshaft. I have had great tire blowing,very strong pull to 5500 on 455 9 to 1 motors with these two camshafts. Ether one will more than fit your engine combo and make you smile without hurting your wallet.
Crower 60916 278-289-221-229 460 470 112 in @108
Summit 2802 282-292-224-234 470 490 114 in @ 109

Pontiac/Olds/Buicks.. My personal experience with OEM Heads.. Wider seat Duration and Wider Center has given me the best results. Plus they don't rattle like a sold roller:)

Kenny
What did you experience when you compared a tight LSA cam against a wide LSA cam?
Please Note!
THE ABOVE POST IN NO WAY REFLECTS THE VIEWS OF SPEED TALK OR IT'S MEMBERS AND SHOULD BE VIEWED AS ENTERTAINMENT ONLY...Thanks, The Management!
User avatar
MadBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 15024
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The Great White North

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by MadBill »

427dart wrote:Compared to all the "new" way to design a cam for a particular engine...were all the factory engineers just guessing when developing a cam for engines back in the late 60's? Pontiac had Malcom McKellar design their factory race and street cams...one of the best back then.
Surprisingly, the answer is at least partly "yes"! I read an article many years ago re a race cam development approach Pontiac tried using the "Cuban Square" (or some similar name) They created some kind of geometric figure and used it to guide them in shifting around open/close events in search of the optimum combo.
Felix, qui potuit rerum cognscere causas.

Happy is he who can discover the cause of things.
wyrmrider
Guru
Guru
Posts: 6941
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:52 pm
Location:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by wyrmrider »

I never worked with KcKeller who had an excellent reputation but Chrysler's cam guy- in the South did his by hand- I've been trying to come up with his name but am embarrassed to say it does not come up-- Camcraft?
that said
OP would be well ahead to use a HR, the Jones HR but maybe one size smaller due to the compression and axle
even that Hot Rod article shows the difference
With a MOPAR size lifter you can come close to HR profile but with all the durability problems, with the chevy size lifter there is no comparison HR all the way
LCaverly
Member
Member
Posts: 143
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2014 4:27 pm
Location:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by LCaverly »

230-236 on a 108 lsa 104 icl .536-.540 this would be a custom grind using comps XE lobes. 455's really like a 108, monster torque and really good power, anything tighter and vacuum becomes a problem and anything wider you give up torque and power. you won;t have to worry about to tall a gear or a heavy car.
Len C
tjs44
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 747
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 2:30 pm
Location: long beach.ca

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by tjs44 »

Len,I know they like the 108 for HP but IMO with a street stick shift car they suck to drive.Been there done that.Tom
User avatar
Stan Weiss
Vendor
Posts: 4813
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Pontiac 455 cam recommendation

Post by Stan Weiss »

MadBill wrote:
427dart wrote:Compared to all the "new" way to design a cam for a particular engine...were all the factory engineers just guessing when developing a cam for engines back in the late 60's? Pontiac had Malcom McKellar design their factory race and street cams...one of the best back then.
Surprisingly, the answer is at least partly "yes"! I read an article many years ago re a race cam development approach Pontiac tried using the "Cuban Square" (or some similar name) They created some kind of geometric figure and used it to guide them in shifting around open/close events in search of the optimum combo.
Bill,
A few of their cams seem to have some dwell. It almost looks like a Cycloidal type curve was used.

Stan
Stan Weiss/World Wide Enterprises
Offering Performance Software Since 1987
http://www.magneticlynx.com/carfor/carfor.htm
David Vizard & Stan Weiss' IOP / Flow / Induction Optimization Software
http://www.magneticlynx.com/DV
Post Reply