Wouldn't be the first time...Frankshaft wrote:I think your splittling hairs and over thinking this deal...
Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
Moderator: Team
Re: Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
Re: Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
I like the quench pad deshrouding better on "B" heads. My mistake. Interesting that Edelbrock changed that.BradH wrote:Plug sides of "A" and "B" chambers essentially the same;.the quench side is where 98% of the differences are. Edelbrock revised the quench pads on those heads and reduced the chamber volume with the later "A" casting.
"B" has the larger chamber, larger intake runner volume, and smaller quench pad.
Servedio Cylinder Head Development
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
Re: Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
Goofed the last post up. This chamber quench side I actually like more. Does it run better or flow better? I do not know. It is interesting that Edelbrock opened up that side and reduced quench volume.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Servedio Cylinder Head Development
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
Re: Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
Deshrouded better, but less conducive to pressure recovery. I've been wondering how much the "A" chamber would increase in volume if I pulled back just the exhaust side of the quench pad... would look more like an LS3 chamber.Carnut1 wrote:I like the quench pad deshrouding better on "B" heads. My mistake. Interesting that Edelbrock changed that.BradH wrote:Plug sides of "A" and "B" chambers essentially the same;.the quench side is where 98% of the differences are. Edelbrock revised the quench pads on those heads and reduced the chamber volume with the later "A" casting.
"B" has the larger chamber, larger intake runner volume, and smaller quench pad.
Re: Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
If you compare the quench pads of the two different chambers by referencing where the pad stops with respect to the bolt holes seen below the chambers, you'll see how much the quench was increased with the change to the smaller "A" chamber.Carnut1 wrote:Goofed the last post up. This chamber quench side I actually like more. Does it run better or flow better? I do not know. It is interesting that Edelbrock opened up that side and reduced quench volume.
Re: Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
Looks to me like the old chamber has more quench. Snap a pic with a caliper to clarify. Thanks, CharlieBradH wrote:If you compare the quench pads of the two different chambers by referencing where the pad stops with respect to the bolt holes seen below the chambers, you'll see how much the quench was increased with the change to the smaller "A" chamber.Carnut1 wrote:Goofed the last post up. This chamber quench side I actually like more. Does it run better or flow better? I do not know. It is interesting that Edelbrock opened up that side and reduced quench volume.
Servedio Cylinder Head Development
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
631-816-4911
9:00am - 9:00pm EST
Re: Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
Big block dodges have the chamber pushed all the way to the exhaust side of the bore. Stability of SSR will be paramount to keep the swirl from getting out of control on that head. The chamber with the most definition behind the valves will help SSR stability. I would pay attention to valve pocket shaping, make them a little bigger to match chamber shape .
Mummert Machine and Development 4 stroke hp
Mummert Y-blocks
Mummert Y-blocks
Re: Different chamber styles & timing / octane reqs
double post
Mummert Machine and Development 4 stroke hp
Mummert Y-blocks
Mummert Y-blocks