dieselgeek wrote:dirtracr5 wrote:Crazy that DI doesn't seem to work as well in competition. It has done wonders for OEM applications.
On the few I've been able to tune on - the wonderful part is that there are no tricks to enrichments. Literally these do not need accel enrichments, warmup enrichments, etc. I am sure this is awesome for emissions. I'm told the problem with hotrodding a DI engine is that as soon as you increase airflow into the combustion chamber, all bets are off and you need another million dollar redesign to optimize all the parts of the combustion chamber that are required to support it.
But that was just a chat with an engineer supporting the C7R programs, it could all be BS. In my world, I get to do "a little" with a large variety of engines. One day I'd like to be able to do A LOT of studying/development on one type of engine like Warp Speed. Maybe some day.
My only experience with modifying direct injection was a Pro-charger install on a 2014 Corvette with the LT-1 DI motor. It made 633 at the wheels
on an otherwise stock unmodified Corvette. It may be the fastest most powerful street car I've ever driven, it's stupid fast. The program was just downloaded out of a hand-held unit and was not modified. This was using stock GM injectors, intake, cam, etc.
I don't even qualify for "tooner" status but I would say there was a substantial increase in airflow through this engine and it does make steam. Weather or not it would make more steam with port injection I have no idea. One thing I can say about DI is that there is a distinct advantage when you are fuel limited. DI works better with low octane fuels and high compression/boost. I believe this has to do with the piston cooling you get from vaporization. I reserve the right to be wrong.