Camshaft lift question

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Camshaft lift question

Postby metriccar » Tue Aug 14, 2012 3:37 pm

Let's say you have a restricted (basically stock) engine and exhaust manifolds.

Assuming all else is equal, duration at .050, LSA, etc, but one has a .50" lift and the other has a .54" lift, what is that going to do to : low RPM power, midrange , and top end?
metriccar
Member
Member
 
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:46 am

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby T-flow » Tue Aug 14, 2012 5:33 pm

I don't think much will be seen. But depends on the engine were talking about? Also cam timing events will have more effect than lift.


T-flow
T-flow Cylinder Heads
www.tflowheads.com
T-flow
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 623
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 6:36 pm

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby Joel Dubose » Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:15 pm

It depends on to many factors than to just focus on lift. Typically you will gain some lower rpm power, not much if any up top. This is just a general statement but it's pretty close.
JDE Heads & Manifolds
I'm WD with AFR,Edelbrock and many other parts and castings suppliers.
JDE has port programs In popular castings for performance uses, If you would like a port designed for your project contact me 704-658-6951
Joel Dubose
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 3:36 pm

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby CamKing » Thu Aug 16, 2012 8:09 am

Joel Dubose wrote:It depends on to many factors than to just focus on lift. Typically you will gain some lower rpm power, not much if any up top. This is just a general statement but it's pretty close.

It'll do the exact opposite of this.

It won't really help the low-end power, because at lower RPM's the added lift isn't needed.
As the RPM goes up, and the CFM requirements go up, the added lift will start helping the power.
You won't really see the peak HP RPM go up, but it will hold on a little longer.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs
Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
(704)489-2449
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 6627
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby Joel Dubose » Thu Aug 16, 2012 10:44 am

Creaaing the lift
CamKing wrote:
Joel Dubose wrote:It depends on to many factors than to just focus on lift. Typically you will gain some lower rpm power, not much if any up top. This is just a general statement but it's pretty close.

It'll do the exact opposite of this.

It won't really help the low-end power, because at lower RPM's the added lift isn't needed.
As the RPM goes up, and the CFM requirements go up, the added lift will start helping the power.
You won't really see the peak HP RPM go up, but it will hold on a little longer.


Well I haven't seen it work out this way. I've added longer rockers to a multitude of engines on the dyno. In theory more flow was why I increased the lift through rocker ratio. Generally speaking and I say generally because there are way to many factors involved to be making a blanket statement. I gained low end power. As the RPM's increased so did the amount of air out the exh. Call it gulp factor if you would like. It didn't make sense because the airflow gains were at high lift, no where near overlap. None the less the bottom line was increasing the lift also increased valve speed showing an increase in flow. It's just a matter of what the engine does with it as to what it does for power. A running engine does things that on the surface doesn't make sense. Over time I've learned to see the results, not just in power or trq. but in results from all the other numbers on the dyno sheet. Example , bsac, Ve, airflow through the engine etc. For the record I'm working mainly on race engines. Not so much on stock engines with a cam.
JDE Heads & Manifolds
I'm WD with AFR,Edelbrock and many other parts and castings suppliers.
JDE has port programs In popular castings for performance uses, If you would like a port designed for your project contact me 704-658-6951
Joel Dubose
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 502
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 3:36 pm

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby CamKing » Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:14 am

We're not talking about changing rocker ratios.
Changing rocker ratios also changes effective duration, if you don't change the lash with the rocker ratio. It also changes the overlap area.

When keeping the duration the same, and increasing lift, you increase the top-end power, and it holds the power a little longer.
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs
Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
(704)489-2449
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 6627
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby metriccar » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:19 pm

I talked to a cam grinder for about an hour and his rule of thumb was more lift equals more low end power, all else being equal, which if someone asked me, I would have thought the opposite. But if anything I could see it improving the whole RPM range (more air in at all RPM's but no more duration/overlap=more power). In trying for more low end power from what I have now (COMP 12-646-5) I was trying for a shorter duration exhaust vs. intake to prevent reversion on stock exhaust manifolds (some people say you want more duration on stock exhaust manifolds to help with the weak exhaust but if it's weak my opinion is that it would just go up into the intake if it's easier to go there than istead of exhaust so you'd be better off with shorter duration exhaut, whereas my cam has longer duration, but from what I am being told, shorter exhaust duration for my type of motor is more helpful for higher RPMs and lower RPMs, you don't see much difference).
metriccar
Member
Member
 
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:46 am

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby novadude » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:37 pm

metriccar wrote:some people say you want more duration on stock exhaust manifolds to help with the weak exhaust but if it's weak my opinion is that it would just go up into the intake if it's easier to go there than istead of exhaust so you'd be better off with shorter duration exhaut


Wouldn't that depend more on WHERE the Exhaust centerline is located? I would think there can be a real big difference between too cams with the same exh duration/ Let's say one cam had an early EVO, while the other put all of the extra duration on the closing side.

I'm not sure you can generalize.
novadude
Expert
Expert
 
Posts: 526
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:24 pm
Location: Shippensburg, PA

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby SchmidtMotorWorks » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:53 pm

I talked to a cam grinder for about an hour and his rule of thumb was more lift equals more low end power, all else being equal, which if someone asked me, I would have thought the opposite.


Talk to a different cam grinder.
http://www.schmidtmotorworks.com CamFlowRPM software, CAD CAM CAE CFD, CNC Machining.
SchmidtMotorWorks
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 8418
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 1:30 am
Location: Balboa California / Stuttgart Germany

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby metriccar » Fri Aug 17, 2012 10:02 pm

novadude wrote:
metriccar wrote:some people say you want more duration on stock exhaust manifolds to help with the weak exhaust but if it's weak my opinion is that it would just go up into the intake if it's easier to go there than istead of exhaust so you'd be better off with shorter duration exhaut


Wouldn't that depend more on WHERE the Exhaust centerline is located? I would think there can be a real big difference between too cams with the same exh duration/ Let's say one cam had an early EVO, while the other put all of the extra duration on the closing side.

I'm not sure you can generalize.


Yes. I've been looking at the 12-647-5. Which has a later evo, shorter exh duration but higher lift than the 12-646-5 I'm running now but is billed as a cam for headers. Intake lobe looks the same. I'm thinking comp has it reversed for which would be good for headers and which would be good for manifolds but how would I know more about cams than comp
metriccar
Member
Member
 
Posts: 126
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2011 12:46 am

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby CamKing » Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:31 am

SchmidtMotorWorks wrote:
I talked to a cam grinder for about an hour and his rule of thumb was more lift equals more low end power, all else being equal, which if someone asked me, I would have thought the opposite.


Talk to a different cam grinder.


Or ask him to put his dad on the phone, and go back to mopping the shop. :lol:
Mike Jones
Jones Cam Designs
Denver, NC
jonescams@bellsouth.net
http://www.jonescams.com
(704)489-2449
User avatar
CamKing
Guru
Guru
 
Posts: 6627
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:05 pm
Location: Denver, NC

Re: Camshaft lift question

Postby BigBro74 » Sun Aug 19, 2012 10:02 am

metriccar wrote:
novadude wrote:
metriccar wrote:some people say you want more duration on stock exhaust manifolds to help with the weak exhaust but if it's weak my opinion is that it would just go up into the intake if it's easier to go there than istead of exhaust so you'd be better off with shorter duration exhaut


Wouldn't that depend more on WHERE the Exhaust centerline is located? I would think there can be a real big difference between too cams with the same exh duration/ Let's say one cam had an early EVO, while the other put all of the extra duration on the closing side.

I'm not sure you can generalize.


Yes. I've been looking at the 12-647-5. Which has a later evo, shorter exh duration but higher lift than the 12-646-5 I'm running now but is billed as a cam for headers. Intake lobe looks the same. I'm thinking comp has it reversed for which would be good for headers and which would be good for manifolds but how would I know more about cams than comp


IMO
you are talking to a wal-mart customer service rep there buddy, not a cam grinder
BigBro74
Member
Member
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2010 6:48 pm
Location: Mid Illinois cornfields


Return to Engine Tech

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 540 RAT, Bazman, Chris29, cjperformance, dan__olson, GWEE, Majestic-12 [Bot], swatson454, wrenchbender and 26 guests