Part # M72352-106rick7343 wrote: Any agreement on what flat tappet cam to run? 1/4 mile asphalt oval track... would like around 6500 rpm...
244/244@.050"
.352"/.352" Lobe Lift
106 LSA
Moderator: Team
Part # M72352-106rick7343 wrote: Any agreement on what flat tappet cam to run? 1/4 mile asphalt oval track... would like around 6500 rpm...
Read this.rick7343 wrote:Curious as to the benefits/drawbacks of cams with bigger and smaller differences in the advertised duration vs. the .050 numbers...
I know it affects ramp speed, but what about power characteristics?
CamKing wrote:Read this.rick7343 wrote:Curious as to the benefits/drawbacks of cams with bigger and smaller differences in the advertised duration vs. the .050 numbers...
I know it affects ramp speed, but what about power characteristics?
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=22828
Then you didn't read it.rick7343 wrote:Looks like it mainly looks at how cams are measured not the differences in performance...
CamKing wrote:Part # M72352-106rick7343 wrote: Any agreement on what flat tappet cam to run? 1/4 mile asphalt oval track... would like around 6500 rpm...
244/244@.050"
.352"/.352" Lobe Lift
106 LSA
No. That's a solid grind.rick7343 wrote:CamKing wrote:Part # M72352-106rick7343 wrote: Any agreement on what flat tappet cam to run? 1/4 mile asphalt oval track... would like around 6500 rpm...
244/244@.050"
.352"/.352" Lobe Lift
106 LSA
Is that hydraulic? I should have mentioned we have to run hydraulic lifters......
dirtracr5 wrote:keep us posted on the results. i think you should see big gains going from the ancient shelf cam to a nice modern grind!