connecting rods weighing question

General engine tech -- Drag Racing to Circle Track

Moderator: Team

Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

connecting rods weighing question

Post by Belgian1979 »

What would be a good way to weigh small ends and big ends on an improvised way ? How much difference can there be between the small ends and big ends of a set of rod before the balance is thrown off ?

Thanks
User avatar
Wolfplace
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3580
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:39 pm
Location: Mendocino County, Northern CA
Contact:

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by Wolfplace »

Belgian1979 wrote:What would be a good way to weigh small ends and big ends on an improvised way ? How much difference can there be between the small ends and big ends of a set of rod before the balance is thrown off ?

Thanks
You need some sort of arbor to find the center of the bores to weigh them correctly
The rod also has to hang level

Like so
Image


How much is very subjective,, guess it depends on what you will accept
I have seen so called balanced assemblies that had parts over 10gms different so I guess this is "acceptable" to some,, not to me

I balance to .5 gm per end & .5 total rod weight if possible
That is not ± .5 it is .5
You can also "juggle" parts to come up with acceptable numbers because all if the reciprocating weight is cumulative
Mike
Lewis Racing Engines
4axis CNC block machining


A few of the cars I have driven & owned
A tour of my shop
The Dyno
And a few pics of the gang

"Life is tough. Life is even tougher if you're stupid"
John Wayne
User avatar
Baprace
HotPass
HotPass
Posts: 1908
Joined: Sun Aug 06, 2006 4:57 am
Location: Henrietta NY 14623

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by Baprace »

Belgian1979 wrote:What would be a good way to weigh small ends and big ends on an improvised way ? How much difference can there be between the small ends and big ends of a set of rod before the balance is thrown off ?
Thanks
When I rebuild most customers engine's , I always try to sell balance the engine as the results are justified. normaly a decent street engine will come in for rebuild and when we find the balance out by 10 grams or more the customer always say's WOW I didn't feel a shake before BUT I can certainly feel the difference now. Wolfplace has it correct, in my opinion. =D>
User avatar
Wolfplace
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3580
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:39 pm
Location: Mendocino County, Northern CA
Contact:

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by Wolfplace »

Wolfplace wrote: You can also "juggle" parts to come up with acceptable numbers because all if the reciprocating weight is cumulative
I can't edit the damn post so to make it clear
The last sentence is supposed to say
You can also "juggle" parts to come up with acceptable numbers because all of the reciprocating weight is cumulative
NOT
if the reciprocating weight is cumulative :roll:
Mike
Lewis Racing Engines
4axis CNC block machining


A few of the cars I have driven & owned
A tour of my shop
The Dyno
And a few pics of the gang

"Life is tough. Life is even tougher if you're stupid"
John Wayne
hodge
Expert
Expert
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:05 pm
Location: St Catharines Ontario

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by hodge »

When the weight unbalance is greater than 15 grams per throw it will have a shake so I have found. Where it comes in as a shake may vary.
hodge
Expert
Expert
Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2009 9:05 pm
Location: St Catharines Ontario

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by hodge »

I find that just for the customers satisfaction knowing it needs to be balanced I show them two complete piston rod assembles on the scale, and how bad they come.
User avatar
panic
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Ecbatana
Contact:

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by panic »

Against my better judgment, I'll ask:
what does the rod's center of gravity have to do with reciprocating vs. rotating weight?
User avatar
Wolfplace
Guru
Guru
Posts: 3580
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 10:39 pm
Location: Mendocino County, Northern CA
Contact:

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by Wolfplace »

panic wrote:Against my better judgment, I'll ask:
what does the rod's center of gravity have to do with reciprocating vs. rotating weight?
I don't understand the question?
Mike
Lewis Racing Engines
4axis CNC block machining


A few of the cars I have driven & owned
A tour of my shop
The Dyno
And a few pics of the gang

"Life is tough. Life is even tougher if you're stupid"
John Wayne
Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by Belgian1979 »

Wolfplace wrote:
Belgian1979 wrote:What would be a good way to weigh small ends and big ends on an improvised way ? How much difference can there be between the small ends and big ends of a set of rod before the balance is thrown off ?

Thanks
You need some sort of arbor to find the center of the bores to weigh them correctly
The rod also has to hang level

Like so
Image


How much is very subjective,, guess it depends on what you will accept
I have seen so called balanced assemblies that had parts over 10gms different so I guess this is "acceptable" to some,, not to me

I balance to .5 gm per end & .5 total rod weight if possible
That is not ± .5 it is .5
You can also "juggle" parts to come up with acceptable numbers because all if the reciprocating weight is cumulative
Ok, I was trying to measure things with a wrist pin on a scale, but I can see now that it would not yield good results.

Does anyone here have an idea how good Oliver rods are concerned balancing of small/big end. I seem to have a difference of 1 gr across the total rod weight.
My crank had to be rebalanced and used one rod to do so.
I found some more differences between the small/big ends. But apparently my method is no good.

BTW : how accuratly are cranks balanced. I hear that it would be futile to go really small.
CNC BLOCKS
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4653
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2004 6:34 am
Location: NORTHEAST
Contact:

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by CNC BLOCKS »

Belgian1979 wrote:
Wolfplace wrote:
Belgian1979 wrote:What would be a good way to weigh small ends and big ends on an improvised way ? How much difference can there be between the small ends and big ends of a set of rod before the balance is thrown off ?

Thanks
You need some sort of arbor to find the center of the bores to weigh them correctly
The rod also has to hang level

Like so
Image


How much is very subjective,, guess it depends on what you will accept
I have seen so called balanced assemblies that had parts over 10gms different so I guess this is "acceptable" to some,, not to me

I balance to .5 gm per end & .5 total rod weight if possible
That is not ± .5 it is .5
You can also "juggle" parts to come up with acceptable numbers because all if the reciprocating weight is cumulative
Ok, I was trying to measure things with a wrist pin on a scale, but I can see now that it would not yield good results.

Does anyone here have an idea how good Oliver rods are concerned balancing of small/big end. I seem to have a difference of 1 gr across the total rod weight.
My crank had to be rebalanced and used one rod to do so.
I found some more differences between the small/big ends. But apparently my method is no good.

BTW : how accuratly are cranks balanced. I hear that it would be futile to go really small.
I worked with the great Smokey Yunik on a engine project years ago and asked him about engine balancing and his reply was balancing is an imperfect science and I think he makes sence with that statement.

A few years ago I went to another shop a guy was picking up his rotator and the shop owner was saying he had everything with in one tenth of a gram and was pretty proud of that and on the final spin it was with a couple tenths, After the bob weights we off I told him to put them back on a respin the crank and he did and the crank did not spin up the same it was out a few grams on both ends and he looked like the little boy that shit his pants :oops: :oops:

Its like the oil weight its only a gestimate at best. I have had rods out more then 5 grams on the big end and had to make up 3 different bob weights to make it come out right rather then hack up a new set of Lunati Pro mod rods.
Website is up and running
http://hinksonautomotive-cncblocks.com/
Machine shop tour
http://hinksonautomotive-cncblocks.com/shop-tour/
Monthly Specials
http://hinksonautomotive-cncblocks.com/specials/
55MM babbit cam bearings with 1 hole
MotionMachine
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1564
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:01 am
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by MotionMachine »

How close a crank is balanced all depends on who did it. I tell customers to get rotating assy's unbalanced because mail order balance jobs are rarely very good. How can they balance an assy when no pistons or rods have been removed from their original packaging? The worst I saw was an LS assy that the customer had ordered balanced but it shook so bad he had to take it back out and it required 80 gram removal on both ends. An extreme case but it happened none the less. Some OE's are very close to balance from the factory. Anything German and surprisingly most British inline cranks are very close, most of the time requiring no balance at all, go figure. Like Mike said, .5 gram is what I shoot for. If you're going to do it, it doesn't take that much longer to do it to near perfect so why not? I think the accepted industry standard is 3 grams. My balancer will read 0 if the crank is less than 3 grams. I have to go in and change the calibration every time so that it will read to two decimal points. I think it's probably more important to have all the rotating parts weigh the same than it is to balance the crank to the bobweight.
Belgian1979
Guru
Guru
Posts: 4576
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:34 am
Location: Belgium - Koersel

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by Belgian1979 »

FYI just read Olivers website and it states they have their rods balanced within .5 gram. My scale here only goes to 1 gram so seeing the total weight on the rods I tend to believe them somehow.
engineguyBill
Guru
Guru
Posts: 1264
Joined: Fri Feb 26, 2010 11:15 am
Location: Gold Canyon, AZ

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by engineguyBill »

panic wrote:Against my better judgment, I'll ask:
what does the rod's center of gravity have to do with reciprocating vs. rotating weight?

By ensuring that the rod is level doesn't really have anything to do with finding the rod's "center of gravity". By having the rod level, the weight of the big end is not influencing the weight of the small end and vice-versa. The ultimate goal is to segregate the weights of small end and big end from each other. The small end of the rod is reciprocating weight and the big end is rotating weight.
Bill

Perfect Circle Doctor of Motors certification
SAE Member (30 years)
ASE Master Certified Engine Machinist (+ two otherASE Master Certifications)
AERA Certified Professional Engine Machinist
PackardV8
Guru
Guru
Posts: 7629
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 2:03 pm
Location: Spokane, WA

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by PackardV8 »

FWIW, I've never needed to touch an Oliver to the grinder. They are always within spec. However, trust, but verify.

jack vines
Jack Vines
Studebaker-Packard V8 Limited
Obsolete Engineering
User avatar
panic
Guru
Guru
Posts: 2295
Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Ecbatana
Contact:

Re: connecting rods weighing question

Post by panic »

The small end of the rod is reciprocating weight and the big end is rotating weight.

But... it's not. The separation of motion paths* isn't related to how much weight is on either end, but on what a molecule in any position is doing.

* very little of the rod mass is pure reciprocating or pure rotating weight.
Post Reply