MadBill wrote:Exactly. The 115 CFM/" sq. was Vizard's flow bench finding re the flow through a one foot length of straight tubing, hence my assessment that a typical dual 3" system would ideally be used for less than the calculated 739 HP.Orr89rocz wrote:... but with long lengths there probably is more backpressure and losses involved. Not sure where that 115cfm flow factor comes from....
Yes a 1' length of straight tube is quite different to 12' of tube bent up to fit into a vehicle.